Steve wrote: Many
biblical inerrancy fundamentalists look foolish and backward when they try to defend things that they shouldnâ $ ™ t waste their time defending.
Not exact matches
Historic
fundamentalists would find them compromising, adapting, walking center lines and warning on one of the two main marks — the other being
biblical inerrancy — of fundamentalism.
Yet they largely agreed with the
fundamentalists on such questions as
biblical inerrancy, the Virgin birth and the physical resurrection of Jesus.
As one might expect, however, Barr is at his best when he returns again and again to his central theme — a critique of the style of
biblical interpretation that follows from the
fundamentalist commitment to a doctrine of the «
inerrancy of Scripture.»