Not exact matches
I almost didn't put this item in the list because I am about
as uneasy with the concept of a «
biblical worldview»
as I am with the concept of «
biblical literacy.»
Biblical literacy should no longer be defined
as «how much you know about the Bible,» but should be defined instead by «How much you love like Jesus, who reveals to us that God is love.»
When it comes to information, what is needed is not so much
biblical literacy,
as it is
biblical understanding.
I wouldn't even consider that now, of course, (
as it would be an unintended mockery) but I still think
Biblical literacy is good for literary purposes in general and critical for anyone who claims to base their lives on the book.
Our standards for
biblical literacy are much too low
as Christians.
For example, I am not sure that knowing Bible facts is the same thing
as biblical literacy.
They see people not living very biblically, and not really having a
biblical worldview, and so they think that if they can raise the level of
biblical literacy, this will raise the level of
biblical living
as well.
There is only one point in the New Testament,
as far
as I know, at which the gospel is preached to those entirely lacking in knowledge of the scriptures (most of the gentiles to whom Paul preached were among the sympathizers of the synagogue, so Paul could presume what George Lindbeck calls «
biblical literacy»), and that is Paul's famous address on the Areopagus.
My tuppence worth: I totally agree that
Biblical literacy / illiteracy is not the issue so much
as Biblical application (which
as Jeremy points out sometimes happens without any
Biblical knowledge anyway).