In presenting this point of view I am not discussing the untenable position of
biblical literalism which holds that man's nature is corrupted by the sin of a generic ancestor, Adam.
Not exact matches
Not only is this not a faithful approach, but it also means that
Biblical literalism denies the very literal truth of the Bible
which it purports to defend.
Biblical literalism is a powerful force today; it tends to imprison people in attitudes that were suitable enough when science and technology were little dreamt of but
which fail to illuminate a society in
which, for instance, it is desirable, because of the effects of modern hygiene on death rates, for women to bear, on the average, perhaps a third as many infants as were appropriate two or three thousand or even two hundred years ago, a society in
which war might mean something like the end of the species, or at least vastly closer to that than any war of the past could be.
My friend Nathaniel comments that he'd like to see a «Jael With Her Tent Peg,» but I think that's expecting a level of
biblical literalism, to coin a phrase
which was already in existence and didn't really need coining... Anyway, you tell me.
The final result was the rejection within mainstream culture of
biblical literalism with its repudiation of history, geology, and the scientific method, and an acceptance of the contributions of science, of evolution and Freudian psychology, of a «higher criticism» of the Bible, of the move from an agrarian economy to an industrial economy and its need for high technology, and of a rearrangement of political views to accommodate social planning and reform
which became known in the churches as the Social Gospel.
It was, then, over two decades before he published Origin of Species that Darwin replaced
biblical literalism with a «more simple and sublime» theology, one in
which God is viewed as ordaining that creation operate without interference, through the natural law that he established.
Creationism ranges from
biblical literalism to «intelligent design,»
which disputes natural selection theory.