Not exact matches
In this work he commented one by one on all his writings, giving details about the date and circumstances of the work, noting places where he had changed his mind,
pointing out
passages where he got things wrong, for example where he had cited a
biblical text from memory and not gotten it correct.
I, (and many
biblical scholars and fellow Christians), would argue the
point of these
passages is not that patriarchy is the best foundation for marriage, but rather that the humility and service of Jesus Christ is the best example for marriage... and any relationship.
I have yet to meet anyone who claims to have been convinced that what the Bible says is true, or who claims to have been convinced about the correctness of a particular interpretation of any
Biblical passage by someone who wanted to argue those
points.
«In particular, those who saw in Scripture a sanction for slavery were both more insistent on
pointing to the
passages that seemed so transparently to support their position and more confident in decrying the wanton disregard for divine revelation that seemed so willfully to dismiss
biblical truths.»
The catechism, it will be seen, assigns belief in God and trust in God to two different virtues, though as Benedict XVI's Spe salvi
points out, in several
Biblical passages «the words «faith» and «hope» seem interchangeable»; [10] but is either of them to be counted as a virtue?
For we have already
pointed out that the
biblical passage is late, and, though we can not date it within a couple of centuries, it is probably not earlier than Plato and may easily be as late as Zeno.
Yet, some
biblical scholars
point out that this
passage can only refer to the homosexual acts of heterosexual persons.7 This is because the writers of the Bible did not distinguish between a homosexual orientation and same - gender sexual acts.
Yet as we look at each of the Five
Points in more detail in subsequent posts, we will make room for other Calvinistic voices to be heard as well, and as we look at the
biblical passages they use to defend their theology, we will see that Calvinism may not be as reasonable or
biblical as it first appears.
Despite my hesitancy to use selective
passages of Scripture to «make a
point» and my general aversion to bullet -
points, I felt it necessary to include a more detailed presentation of a
biblical alternative to exclusivism for the benefit of those readers who are themselves searching for one.
The
passage in 1 Samuel 8 where Israel asks for a king is a pivotal
point in the
biblical narrative.
It may mean printing the text and
pointing out specific verses or quoting them with sufficient frequency that it becomes clear that these verses are present, that the ways in which the
passage was remembered — the past interpretations brought to the present hearing — have overlooked these verses, that these are not the creation of the preacher but are the
biblical text.
It's odd that they find so many folks to demonize because of arcane
biblical passages yet continue to pray in public despite the
pointed criticism of such actions by their Creator.
In «Proverbs,» a
passage from the
biblical book of the same name provides the starting
point for a meditation on sexual love.
This is the first of five revision sheets, aimed at the OCR GCSE Philosophy (Unit B602) Paper 2, with some key
points and some
Biblical passages.
This is the final revision sheet in a series of five, aimed at the OCR GCSE Philosophy (Unit B602) Paper 2, with some key
points and suggested
Biblical passages, looking at what Christians rely on to determine how they should behave.