The above coupled with all kinds of abuses that people perpetrate in the name of religion makes me wonder whether the Church is really playing
its biblical role as Jesus would require of us.
Not exact matches
Antoinette, I understand the
biblical words «judge» and «church» quite differently than you,
as well
as the
role of the pastor.
The initiative has sparked a campus - wide debate about
biblical interpretation and the
roles of women,
as well
as a second group called Students for Egalitarianism in Marriage.
Obviously, I'm a big advocate for mutual submission in marriage,
as that is what I believe those
biblical passages ultimately teach and this is what works best in our marriage, but more important than adopting a single household model — either patriarchal or egalitarian — is adopting the posture of Jesus Christ, who emptied himself of power and took the
role of servant.
The theological
role of the Bible is controversial in many Quaker circles, especially since Quakerism acts
as a last desperate handhold for many Christians who feel abused by
Biblical literalism and fundamentalism.
The
role of a civil authority is to govern society and we're instructed to respect our civil authority
as a clear
biblical mandate.
As primary actors in the speaker's drama they stage in pulpits, chancels, or at Table, preachers first play roles in the speaker's dramas present in the canon as biblical text
As primary actors in the speaker's drama they stage in pulpits, chancels, or at Table, preachers first play
roles in the speaker's dramas present in the canon
as biblical text
as biblical texts.
As long as Christianity had to play — or allowed itself to play — the role of Western culture - religion, the nomenclature «Christian» was obliged to stand for all sorts of dispositions extraneous or tangential in relation to biblical fait
As long
as Christianity had to play — or allowed itself to play — the role of Western culture - religion, the nomenclature «Christian» was obliged to stand for all sorts of dispositions extraneous or tangential in relation to biblical fait
as Christianity had to play — or allowed itself to play — the
role of Western culture - religion, the nomenclature «Christian» was obliged to stand for all sorts of dispositions extraneous or tangential in relation to
biblical faith.
Does such a critical, yet faithful, approach
as that outlined above imply that only the expert can arrive at an adequate
Biblical understanding of the
role of women in the church and family?
The writings of Harold Lindsell, Francis Schaefer, Bernard Ramm, Carl Henry, Clark Pinnock, Dick France, James Packer and others present a range of contradictory theological formulations on such issues
as the nature of
Biblical inspiration, the place of women in the church and family, the church's
role in social ethics, and the Christian's response to homosexuality.
As we turn in the next chapter to consider the evangelical church's role in society, we will see that matters of a correct theological understanding of social ethics - one resting in Biblical authority - do not hinge so much on the issue of Biblical hermeneutics as they do on the matter of conflicting loyalties to ecclesiological tradition
As we turn in the next chapter to consider the evangelical church's
role in society, we will see that matters of a correct theological understanding of social ethics - one resting in
Biblical authority - do not hinge so much on the issue of
Biblical hermeneutics
as they do on the matter of conflicting loyalties to ecclesiological tradition
as they do on the matter of conflicting loyalties to ecclesiological traditions.
Drawing on
biblical and church tradition, he spoke of the
roles of pastor, priest, prophet and king
as historically normative for the Christian ministry.
For a time
biblical criticism played a creative
role in genuine liberation and individuation, insofar
as its «agentic» function was dialectically related to what Bakan calls «the communion function,» that is, the process by which separation is finally overcome.
My third prediction is that the word «evangelical» will go the way of «fundamentalism»
as its adherents become increasingly homogonous and
as the word becomes associated with dogmatism regarding politics, science, women's
roles, homosexuality, salvation, and
biblical literalism.
While using a conceptuality largely framed by process philosophy, it addresses for the most part the historically contingent elements within the Christian tradition: the
biblical witness to Israel and to Jesus, his
role as the Christ, the meaning of his death and resurrection, and the implications of the Christian proclamation of the Trinity.
Those studies become less and less an occupation engaged in or intrinsic to his
role as witness to the gospel and pastor to people, and become more and more frantic efforts to find
biblical, or theological, generalities which will religiously dignify his promotional purposes.
A canonical approach, in Brevard Childs» words, «interprets the
biblical text in relation to a community of faith and practice for whom it served a particular theological
role as possessing divine authority.»
There is one more myth regarding «
biblical womanhood» that we really need to address
as part of our series — and that is the myth that a true woman of God is defined by her
roles as a wife, mother, and homemaker.
We could not have picked a «better» church to visit on our first Sunday,
as the pastor was speaking that week — scratch that; he was shouting — about «
biblical» gender
roles, referencing stay - at - home dads
as «abnormal» and it being against God's will for a wife to have a larger income than her husband.
I think Jüngel's dual
role as theologian and
biblical scholar stood him very well in calling attention to the importance of this insight in the
biblical narrative.
In fact, 1Timothy 2 appear in a list of «key texts» on the CBMW site and is commonly cited
as biblical justification for limiting the
roles of women in church leadership.
The inspired writers introduced dramatic
roles as a way of allowing the most significant characters of Scripture to manifest themselves and to speak, and so to progress the
Biblical narrative from within.
In the horrific days and weeks which followed, this uninteresting comment would take on the
role of
Biblical scripture, repeated throughout the legal process
as proof that she was coming to the UK to work.
After being typecast
as a gangster he gradually expanded the scope of his
roles, and, in the»40s, gave memorable «good guy» performances
as in a number of psychological dramas; he played federal agents, scientists,
Biblical characters, business men, bank clerks, among other characters.
First, Australian director Garth Davis (Lion) called and offered him the part of Judas in his
biblical epic Mary Magdalene, which stars Rooney Mara in the title
role and Joaquin Phoenix
as Jesus.
It's a small
role, representing a
biblical «herald» (someone who makes public proclamation), who Aronofsky comedically depicts
as a literary publicist.
Mel Gibson has been planning a sequel to his controversial
biblical epic The Passion of the Christ for a while now, and star Jim Caviezel has finally confirmed he'll be growing out his beard to reprise his
role as the Son of God.
I thought Mara would be one of this season's front - runners for playing the title
role in the
biblical drama Mary Magdalene, but the Weinstein Company pushed that film to Easter and now Mara's only horse in the race is Una, a stage adaptation in which she confronts the man who took sexual advantage of her
as a child.
This forgiveness Bible study examines relevant scriptures for the purpose of building a
Biblical understanding of: • what forgiveness is and what it isn't • God's
role in the process of forgiveness • what Jesus accomplished at the cross for each of us • our mandate to forgive
as we've been forgiven • what gets in the way of forgiving others • how to truly forgive the unforgivable
Ladouceur utilizes a language that will be blurrily familiar to many of us, subconsciously quoting comic / cartoon characters we faintly remember from childhood,
as his characters guide our boggled understanding of the world's belief systems across visions of totem poles, lotus blossoms and piles of elephant heads; all the while new age gurus, goofy mystics and
Biblical actors flex and fumble through their
roles as spiritual advisors, leaving us to sort it out for ourselves.
Through this class we will tackle such diverse themes
as female rulers, women's
roles in the home and kitchen, the concept of the muse, the historical odds of being a female artist,
as well
as biblical stories of rape, subjugation and triumphs.
This can mean anything from discussing
Biblical passages about transformation and redemption to discussing Christian values, such
as defining what is right or wrong about a particular situation and how the Christian concept of sin plays a
role in relationships and human behavior.
Based on secular research, his own experience
as a counselor, surveys, and personal interviews, he provides
biblical perspectives on the differences between men and women, rekindling love in difficult times, sexual intimacy, habits of unhealthy marriages, fidelity, and the
role of faith in marriage.