Sentences with phrase «biblical scholars like»

Of course, existentialist theologians like Tillich and biblical scholars like Bultmann have already drawn upon Heidegger's early writings, particularly Being and Time, in developing doctrines of God and human existence.

Expecting him to embrace an interpretation of Genesis more in line with biblical scholars like John Walton or Bruce Waltke would be a bit like expecting Donald Trump to become a socialist!

I've been encouraged to receive positive reviews from biblical scholars like Ben Witherington, Peter Enns, Roger Olson, Daniel Kirk, and Brian LePort, as well as from conservative evangelical women who weren't necessarily expecting to like the book or who may differ from me regarding some gender issues.

She makes no effort to engage in the serious minded and easy to find rebuttals of her position by biblical scholars like James White, Donald Wold, James DeYoung, and Thomas Schmidt.

Who would be more «qualified» to read scripture than a biblical scholar like John Dominic Crossan, a major player in the Jesus Seminar?

Not exact matches

But you know a lot less about the Bible than Biblical Scholars who have studied the original, Aramiac, Greek and Hebrew texts and a lot more learned and educated than you and still believe: guys like Fr.

It is very simple — you apply the same logic to every other god like Allah etc but refuse to apply the same logic to yours... which in turn makes you an atheist towards Allah... but since you make a exception for Jesus (I should also tell you to read some of Prof Bart Erhman — leading biblical scholar) this already makes your stance contradictory.

the American Academy of Religion represents a WIDE spectrum of beliefs among scholars: from atheists to all variety of religions, even (though it sounds like it shocks you) biblical inerrantists.

History is full of people like yourself — yes intelligent, rational and logical — who dove into scripture to rip it apart and wound up being theologians and biblical scholars and Jesus followers.

Theologians and biblical scholars have customarily approached such passages under the rubrics of «Salvation History,» «Drama of Redemption,» and the like.

Some of our best biblical scholars have enabled us to read passages like Luke 21 without having to take them seriously.

Steve... I think we're floggin» a dead horse here, but for what it's worth, understand that I'm not trying to convince you to think like I do, rather I wd hope that room wd be made for many theological differences.To think discuss and debate theology is well supported by the New Testament and history, and is perfectly within the bounds of what it means to engage our minds with the subject at hand.Theologians and biblical scholars have done this very thing for centuries, revealing a plethora of opinion on the evolving world of biblical studies.Many capable authors have written and debated the common themes as well as the differences between Paul, John, Jesus, the synoptics, etc..

It has many sources, from redaction critics who started looking at each Gospel as a whole to literary scholars like Northrop Frye and Frank Kermode who have called renewed attention to the narrative shape of biblical texts.

When biblical scholars have interested themselves in ethical studies, they have tended to focus on rather specific, narrow topics: social justice, the status of women, war, vengeance, property rights, ecological concern for nature and the like.

The subtitle of this book is «a new vision of who he was» like as if N.T. Wright is smarter than all the biblical scholars of the last two thousand years.

The heroes of modern - day evangelicalism, from scholars like N.T. Wright to pastors like Rob Bell, are passionately and unapologetically contextual textualists, working diligently with a host of ancient literary and archaeological sources to make sense of biblical texts as they would have been understood in their day.

With biblical scholars, however, you often feel like they're flying just a little blinder than everyone else.

An interview with Catholic Islamologist Michel Cuypers earlier this year with Il Regno, has highlighted this and that today a growing number of Islamic scholars are calling for modern Biblical - like exegesis.

Some of Spurgeon's exegesis will not please modern biblical scholars, for he often sounds more like Athanasius or Bernard of Clairvaux (especially on the Song of Songs) than he does Benjamin Jowett or David Friedrich Strauss.

These and other similar facts lead most biblical scholars to say that Matthew, who likes to organize his materials topically, gives us more than a single sermon.

One view that is prominent among biblical scholars is that although God used war, He didn't like it.

And again, through the work of other scholars like Bultmann and Buri, with their frank recognition of the mythological element in the biblical story, we have come to see that the affirmations of Scripture have their abiding significance, not in spite of, but precisely because of their being stated in language which can only be described as highly metaphorical.

Embarrassingly poor biblical scholarship tainted by the current culture... I'd like to know where this «scholar» went to seminary as a black list item for future scholars... incredible, really!

She doesn't sound like a Biblical scholar to me.

«as a biblical - scholar and pastor» I'm a theology major and if we turned in any work like this... automatic «F» I'm going to show it to my professor and say «but if they can do crappy work on CNN, why not here in class too!»

Places like Basra, Iraq — on the edge of what scholars think was the Biblical Garden of Eden — hit 129 degrees Fahrenheit this year, approaching the point where humans can't survive outdoors.