Not exact matches
Biblical interpretation naturally absorbs a lot of ink; but «modern biblical scholars» will be surprised to learn that many of them regard miracle stories as fictions «designed to influence the common folk of an ancient and more simple time»: a view closer to old - fashioned anticlericalism of Thomas Paine's vintage than modern scholarship even of a radical
Biblical interpretation naturally absorbs a lot of ink; but «modern
biblical scholars» will be surprised to learn that many of them regard miracle stories as fictions «designed to influence the common folk of an ancient and more simple time»: a view closer to old - fashioned anticlericalism of Thomas Paine's vintage than modern scholarship even of a radical
biblical scholars» will be surprised to learn that many of them
regard miracle stories as fictions «designed to influence the common folk of an ancient and more simple time»: a view closer to old - fashioned anticlericalism of Thomas Paine's vintage than modern
scholarship even of a radical stripe.
This can be
regarded as a form of liberal theology; so at this point I will simply argue that Wesley would support no holds barred
biblical scholarship and rethink his teaching in its light.
Point being, here's the far left fringe of
biblical scholarship — and you
regard him as winking at your position (when he's giving a scathing treatment of it).
In turning to the Bible for doctrine, therefore, we should have due
regard for the findings of
biblical scholarship.
Within the Church, «scientific» exegesis has often been
regarded as the gold standard of serious
biblical scholarship, and modern Christians are often as contemptuous of premodern allegory, figural exegesis, and typology as your neighborhood philosophe.
Published originally with the title From Reimarus to Wrede, it could hardly have been expected to leave such an impact, for it is mainly a survey of
biblical scholarship in
regard to Jesus between the writings of Reimarus in 1778 and Wrede in 1901.
While there are excellent and well - stated «conservative positions» with
regard to certain
biblical issues, there is, no such thing as an «evangelical body of
scholarship» which constitutes anything like a rival «school» to mainstream
scholarship.