The field of
biblical studies often tends toward the insular and pedantic.
Not exact matches
I should point out that
biblical studies has a distinct advantage over theology when it comes to finding a place in the university, since it is a historical discipline which can and
often does just as well locate elsewhere — for instances in a department of Near East
studies.
The alternative method,
often used by scholars, considers one epoch of
Biblical religion at a time, presenting the entire complex of ideas which characterized that era, and then moves on to
study the next succeeding epoch as a whole.
Those who have had basic courses in the
biblical languages and are willing to devote 20 minutes a day to such language
study should gain enough language ability to base their sermon text
study on the original text, and they should have enough linguistic skill to use the best of the great philological commentaries, which
often cite words from the original languages.
Years ago, when I began to seriously
study Scripture, I
often had questions about a certain
Biblical passage or theological issue.
Popularizations
often have this effect, but Bloom is a major figure and a serious literary critic (jacket - cover blurbs rightly identify him as «America's pre-eminent literary critic» and «the critic of our time»), so in trying to comprehend the level of the argument I found myself opting at times for disingenuousness, bombast or simple ignorance of the field of
biblical studies.