But
biblical tradition refuses to allow God's law to become identified with the kings law.
Not exact matches
Revisiting late medieval
biblical interpretation, we may consider the delicacy of the hermeneutic circle formed by Scripture and
tradition, appreciating the fragility of a synthesis that
refuses to impose on ancient consensus a linear, hierarchical path to truth.
Biblical understanding, in the
tradition of Calvin, teaches that the will of man can not choose God without God first choosing the man, and neither once chosen by God can the man ultimately
refuse our savior.
Yet he
refuses to collapse
biblical theology into the history of the religion of Israel, distinguishing the two this way: ««History of religion» is concerned with all the forms and aspects of all human religions, while theology tends to be concerned with the truth - claims of one religion and especially with its authoritative texts and
traditions and their interpretations.»