Not exact matches
You are either intentionally or ignorantly — both
then and now, i.e., 13 years later — are depriving those patients whom whom God of love is putting in your path to use your divinity school knowledge and your
biblical faith experience to guide the path of that talk towards the absolute
truth related to the love of God — i.e. true love which stems from God by giving his only Son for whoever to choose to believe on him to have «everlasting life» by having his / her sins forgiven.
@
truth prevails Might you be the same»
truth» that insisted their were no nations in Revelation,
then listed 20 or so
Biblical translations and paraphrases that listed two nations in Revelation?If so, doesn't that kind of negate your credibility and your arguments?God bless
Could it be
then, that your understanding of heresy is actually «a
truth elevated to an extreme where it can no longer be recognized as
biblical»?
And if you say you are a practicing and believing Christian and your pastor is «in it to win it»,
then you need to hit a trail out of that church and find one that teaches AND practices
biblical truth.
It
then present
biblical truths not realized bef... ore —
truths that we can see and apply in our human journey.
Finally, the writer [apparently] operates on the mistaken view that if we can only get at least 51 percent of the voting populace to be swayed sufficiently by our coalesced, power structure, emotional appeals, and
biblical truth (used only where it will work),
then we can pass laws outlawing abortion.
Clear to any
Biblical scholar is the
truth that if it takes work an arguement to come to one position, but a hundered literate eight year olds can read the book and come to the opposite arguement,
then your arguement is contrived, false, and not true to the text.
As people of
Biblical faith,
then, we have a commitment not only to
truth, but also to the practice of science as one path to
truth.