«I think we should trust Eugene Peterson that for whatever reasons he's misspoke and he now is confirming he holds what he describes as a traditional
biblical view on the subject of same - sex relationships.»
Not exact matches
«I recently was in a meeting with church leaders from across the UK that hold a historically
biblical orthodox
view on this
subject.
From Origen's hope that salvation will eventually be received by all, to Karl Rahner's assertion that other religions can serve as pointers to Christ, to Clark Pinnock's
biblical case for a more optimistic
view of salvation, I've found that tucked away in the dusty corners of Christian libraries is a wealth of scholarship
on the
subject.
While we are
on this
subject, how is it that those who take a high
view of the Scriptures are known to produce less by way of creative
biblical interpretation than those who either bracket the question or treat the text as a human document?
My constant purpose was and is to adumbrate
on every
subject I handle a genuinely canonical interpretation of Scripture - a
view that in its coherence embraces and expresses the thrust of all the
biblical passages and units of thought that bear
on my theme - a total, integrated
view built out of
biblical material in such a way that, if the writers of the various books knew what I had made of what they taught, they would nod their heads and say that I had got them right.
But nevertheless, my own
view is that marriage in the
biblical sense is very clearly, from the many, many Christians who wrote to me
on this
subject in their opinion, can only be between a man and a woman.
A Beka, which sees itself as building «the content of every textbook
on the foundation of God's Word,» states that it does not «paraphrase progressive education textbooks and add
biblical principles,» but rather does «primary research in every
subject and looks at the
subject from God's point of
view.»