Key
biblical words such as «psyche,» «heart,» «repentance,» and «nous,» will have to be looked at as if we are seeing them for the first time.
Not exact matches
The
biblical hermeneutic of Christian Zionism distorts
biblical texts by reading them out of their canonical and historical context, making them seem more like
such fictional works as the «Left Behind» series than the whole
Word of God.
My disagreements with the five points of both Calvinism and Arminianism iare not exactly with their theology or understanding of
Biblical texts, but with something much more basic than that: their definition of certain biblical words and theological ideas, such as election, grace, salvation, atonement, justification, eternal life, forgiveness of sins, et
Biblical texts, but with something much more basic than that: their definition of certain
biblical words and theological ideas, such as election, grace, salvation, atonement, justification, eternal life, forgiveness of sins, et
biblical words and theological ideas,
such as election, grace, salvation, atonement, justification, eternal life, forgiveness of sins, etc, etc..
the depths of God's
Word are clearly present with line by line, verse by verse, sequential Bible teaching / preaching ~ it forces the teacher / preacher to study harder & it is a wonderful joy to receive
such Biblical teaching!
Let me start by setting aside the
word «sacrament» itself, because
such language isn't
Biblical.
(And rendering only a partial quote is much like
biblical proof texting in my opinion) I am kind of a stickler on
such details, as a sloppy portrayal of another's
words often leads to inaccurate representation of their intent.
Note also that, while the
word «abomination» has been used with reference to homosexuality, the
biblical interpretation of the
word «abomination» relates to any act of uncleanness as set out in the Holiness Code,
such as eating shellfish, trimming your hair, touching the skin of a dead pig (should we stone the entire NFL?)
Such a proposal in no way invalidates the search for doctrinal forms that are consistent with the substance of the biblical revelation; it merely means that their discovery will constitute but a halfway house rather than the journey's destination itself These doctrinal forms will then have to be adapted to and translated in terms of the assumptions and norms of the American situation in such a way that the Word of God is preserved in its integrity but affirmed in its contemporane
Such a proposal in no way invalidates the search for doctrinal forms that are consistent with the substance of the
biblical revelation; it merely means that their discovery will constitute but a halfway house rather than the journey's destination itself These doctrinal forms will then have to be adapted to and translated in terms of the assumptions and norms of the American situation in
such a way that the Word of God is preserved in its integrity but affirmed in its contemporane
such a way that the
Word of God is preserved in its integrity but affirmed in its contemporaneity.
My first point registers the conviction that the primary hermeneutical principle arises from the decision how to approach the
biblical text, whether to view it as I do as God's written
Word or to see it in a reduced mode
such as is common today.
Those who have had basic courses in the
biblical languages and are willing to devote 20 minutes a day to
such language study should gain enough language ability to base their sermon text study on the original text, and they should have enough linguistic skill to use the best of the great philological commentaries, which often cite
words from the original languages.
I believe it requires Exegetical and Hermeneutical gymnastics to actually spout
such hateful and hurtful
words and shows a great ignorance of any educated
Biblical Critical Studies.
It embraces a fruitful abundance of descriptions of God, including all the substantive terms that can legitimately complete the sentence, «God is...,» beginning with scriptural terms
such as
Word, Wisdom, Water of Life, Bread from Heaven, Truth, and Comforter, as well as alternative proper names
such as El Shaddai and also El Roi» Hagar's name for God, in the only
biblical story where a human being gives God a name.
Coupled with some of the tools of
biblical criticism (
such as the criteria of Embarrassment, Double Discontinuity and Multiple Attestation), he seeks to demonstrate the case for the origin of the Johannine tradition in the
words and actions of the historical Jesus, as passed on by eyewitness accounts and possibly by John the son of Zebedee himself.
Jackson points to the preciousness of the
biblical words themselves as reason for
such extravagance.
This is
such a truism that one is almost ashamed to pen the
words, and yet it remains a fact that, in a great deal of the more conservative
biblical scholarship, it does seem to be assumed that the appeal to factual accuracy would he as valid and important a factor in the case of ancient Near Eastern religious texts as it would be in a modern western court of law or in a somewhat literally - minded western congregation.
The
word «Day» in the original
biblical text of Genesis could be translated into many meanings
such as: daylight, day, time, moment, or long era of time or a period of time.
(b) Secondly,
such a dualism splits the
biblical word off from creation and would substitute the principle of discontinuity for the organic continuity of meaning which exists between the Old and New Testaments.
When a Lutheran and a Catholic each talk of faith, does each define the
word by some comprehensive abstract system, or by the complex associations the
word has in a great range of shared
biblical texts,
such as Romans 1 with its talk of faith as that by which we live, I Corinthians 13 with its association of faith with hope and love, and Hebrews 11 with its definition of faith as assurance and conviction?
Note also that, while the
word «abomination» has been used with reference to hom ose xuality, the
biblical interpretation of the
word «abomination» relates to any act of uncleanness as set out in the Holiness Code,
such as eating shellfish, trimming your hair, touching the skin of a dead pig (should we stone the entire NFL?)
It is true that there is no
word for though in the original, but that is because
biblical Hebrew doesn't use
such words.
Whereas the second Quest demythologized the apocalyptic eschatology that informed Jesus» message of the kingdom in
such a way that the kingdom remained God's initiative and gift eliciting a new ethos, thereby respecting the
biblical - Jewish roots of Jesus»
word and deed, the Borg - Crossan construal tacitly posits an inert deity who at best provides a formal warrant for a class - based cultural criticism and who apparently has allowed the covenant - commitment to Israel to lapse, for there remains neither promise nonfulfillment.
In addition to its practical function as a source of light, its use is also replete with symbolism: candles can stand for transience and death, illustrate
biblical scenes and charge them with emotion, express feelings
such as grief or melancholy, illuminate portrayals of science and the arts in the true sense of the
word or subtly add an erotic layer to the scenes depicted.