Sentences with phrase «big bang theory does»
The big bang theory does not explain the gigantic amount of angular momentum in the universe, but the stretching explanation does.28
http://www.creationscience.com/
The big bang theory does not go before the expansion.
The irony is that your vaunted big bang theory does much more to confirm God than to negate him.
The big bang theory does not say «There was nothing before the big bang.»
Not exact matches
The big bang theory, though not proven, DOES have a mountain of scientific FACTS that support it!
Some atheists tend to forget, or do not know, that it was actually a Priest that first proposed the big bang theory.
What I don't get is the big bang theory and the people who worship it as the big bang law.
You do of course realize that it is reasonable to believe in God and accept the big bang theory, evolution and a 4.5 billion year old earth?
I do agree that all members of the Senate and House committees on Science should be asked whether they accept the big bang theory, evolution and a 4.5 billion year - old earth — or be disqualified.
@Chad «Of course you are free to not know whatever you do nt want to know, however the prevailing cosmological theory (big bang) on the origin of the universe says that it is 13.75 billion years old.»
Whether 28b or 14b, doesn't dispute the big bang theory.
During this short time, we don't have the apparatus to fully understand God, but many of us see the fallacy of believing in things like the «big bang» theory where ordered things come from nothingness.
Even if it happened exactly how the big bang theory says that does not really show that there is no god or that there is a god.
I do believe in Evolution and the big bang but can \ t seem to quite believe in the god theory as a default for everything the godly do not understand or who don't have an IMMEDIATE answer for.
how the hell does the big bang theory lend support of a «creator»???? Yes creation occurred in it's literal definition, but how / whom / is unknown.
Even as a Kid I always thought «fine, the big bang theory crated the universe, but it does not explain what caused the BBT itself, or what caused the agent that in turn caused the BBT» I am so glad this being discussed.
Why do creationists fight the big bang theory when they are saying it was exactly the same thing, just using different words.
How would a person living in a desert know these things without actually someone telling him this?!!! And who is that someone?!!! No one at that time knew anything about big bang theory?!! The actual translation of the arabic word رتقا is it was like a fabric that got torn apart?!!! Isn't that big bang?!! And the other part that was proven too is that everything alive needs water to live?!!! How did they know that then?!!! Islam and science support each other and science only getting to prove things now which was mentioned 1500 years ago in the Quran!!!
I personally don't understand how a God could create us but I also don't understand the math behind the big bang theory either.
If the theory that the big bang was structured, why didn't it say so in the bible?
Yet, I still don't agree with the BIG BANG THEORY?
If you accept the «big bang» theory, where did the stuff that created it come from if not from something greater than it?
I do not see anyone other than you even talk about big bang theory and now you accuse someone else of not knowing it from evolution.
I know that i have prayed and things changed for the good and i have learned that faith requires a courage that atheist just don't have, so now you atheist can start your shallow explanations about how you can think for yourselves and your laughable big bang theories and your evolved from monkeys nonsense and i'll just stay with truth.
that we do nt settle with a simplistic explanation due to our lazyness to find out... example of lazyness thinkin... the big bang theory is back by string theory..
It's also obvious you don't really understand the big bang theory either.
If you say the big bang theory, where did the big bang come from?
Sure we have the big bang theory but that don't explain Why we are it explains how we are.
I love it when people like you claim they know the «Truth», as a scientist myself it was especially funny when commies threw a fit at the big bang theory since it didn't fit their materialistic view of the world.
That kind of circular argument even goes back to explanations of the origin of the universe — according to the big bang theory (which I don't really have a problem with in the «big picture»).
On the atheist side, undeniable scientific proof of the big bang theory and evolution do not disprove the existence of God.
That being said, I don't recall the National Anthem or the Pledge of Allegiance or the Star Spangled Banner ever mentioning dinosaurs or the big bang theory or the theory of evolution.
and I said to the christard, «You don't believe in the big bang theory but you believe your god created the universe out of nothing.
There is no way to prove or disprove a higher being, and there is no way to prove or disprove the big bang theory (contrasting beliefs in most people's opinions), but what we do know is the Earth is way older than 6,000 - 10,000 years old, and that is FACT.
Scientists have been able to provide evidence for the Big Bang Theory, but not the singularity itself that the «big bang» spawned from... so Hawking's assumptions, are just that, assumptions and opinions... and he does not, as you say «tell the truth» based on a proven, factual basBig Bang Theory, but not the singularity itself that the «big bang» spawned from... so Hawking's assumptions, are just that, assumptions and opinions... and he does not, as you say «tell the truth» based on a proven, factual basbig bang» spawned from... so Hawking's assumptions, are just that, assumptions and opinions... and he does not, as you say «tell the truth» based on a proven, factual basis.
It doesn't even require a modification of big bang theory.
Did you not know that the Churches do not believe in the big bang theory.
All you did was spout some quantum theory about virtural particles then said it proves god was the cause of the big bang.
I don't go to some building once a week and worship the big bang theory.
It is funny that some secular religious scientists have discarded the Big Bang Theory in search of Singularity because they just discovered in their infinite knowledge that they do not know what banged.
Quantum Mechanics is WAY weirder and more complex than, say, evolution (though I like how you threw the big bang in there — separate theories, dude), but you won't really hear any religious nuts complaining about the exact same process that gives us QM because it doesn't conflict with their ancient mythology.
People can choose to believe it, but that does not make it science and anything from it can not be legitimately taught as alternative theories of science, whether in astrophysics vs. the «big bang», biology vs. evolution or embryology, etc., or physics and geology in determining the age of the earth and universe.
Foe all who believe in big bang theory — plse advise what was there before the bang — and to those who believe that god created erath 6 - 10 thousand years ago, what was god doing before that — was he on holidays and obe day he decides to create Adam and Eve — guess he was bired with the rest of the universe and created this awful.
The big bang theory has nothing to do with evolution, nor does evolutionary theory address the abiogenesis of life, the transition from non-living material to live, that is still a mystery.
PDX — It doesn't take a Genius to realize from my statements that i have read things other than the Bible you moron i have spent many hours reading and listening to scientists about their theories on the big bang, i have listened to ideas from the most revered scientists including Hawking and others, and they all admit that there are holes in their theories, that nothing fully explains their big bang theory, the physics doesn't add up let alone the concept, there are plenty of scientists hard at work trying to make the numbers fit and the theory hold weight but if you ask any of them they can not give you the answers and the reason being... there are none, the theory doesn't work, If by the observable laws of Physics, Matter in this Universe can not be created or destroyed, you can only change its state, i.e. solid to liquid, to gas... to energy... There is no explanation for how an entire reality full of Matter can be created out of nothing... Scientists know this... idiots that are atheists and simply would rather NOT believe that their lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT to believe... but Your belief in God does not change whether or not he exists you will be judged.
Investigate the evidence yourself, there is nothing at all that truly suggests that the Big Bang happened, the only thing they have used in order to come up with the theory is that in their observances, the Universe appears to be expanding from a central point, it doesn't prove that a Big bang occurred, we know so little about the universe, that we don't even know everything about our own world, and you really believe that our science has figured out the riddle to the beginning of the Universe?
that their religion is flawed somehow... and when questioned why they try to push their ideas on everybody else, they get frustrated and say that it's the Religious ones that push their ideas on people... NOT THEM... That's funny because i have about 1000 comments on this thread that state the opposite... Atheist's i see on this post appear to fall into that category of people that need to try and convince others to believe what they do because they're not sure in their own beliefs... They know that believing in the big bang theory or other similar theories takes as much faith as any religion has to offer... and when pinned down to the facts that By the laws of physics... the big bang couldn't happen....
Sure, we know that something like the big bang happened, but the theory doesn't explain some of the most important bits: why it happened, what the conditions were at the time, and other imponderables.
Had the universe been slightly denser by one part in 1062, the expansion would have slowed and collapsed back on itself in a «big crunch» after 13.7 billion years (today's age of the universe according to the big bang theory).60 Had the universe been slightly less dense by one part in 1062, «the universe would have expanded «so quickly and become so sparse it would soon seem essentially empty, and gravity would not be strong enough by comparison to cause matter to collapse and form galaxies.61 The stretching explanation does not have this problem.
The daughters do their best with what feels like a mostly ad - libbed script, with Sarandon feeling totally out of place, and Baranski re-acting her role as Leonard's cold psychiatrist mother from THE BIG BANG THEORY.