Sentences with phrase «big benefits if»

You'll reap big benefits if you've done your research and know what educational criteria and technological skills are in demand in your new field.

The state is keen to diversify its corporate residents, and they'll reap big benefits if successful outfits set up shop within their borders.

Rather than seeking others to develop their ideas, founders would provide their startups with big benefits if they could rely upon their own fundamental coding skills.

Aerobic exercise will have the biggest effect on your blood pressure, but you'll get even bigger benefits if you combine your regular sweat sessions with a few weight - lifting or resistance - training workouts a week.

The credit may be claimed by either spouse for a maximum tax savings of $ 2,000, and you'll see the biggest benefit if one spouse has an income that's much higher than the other.

This is a big benefit if you need a few more miles to complete an award booking.

Unlike many other concentrating solar technologies, Amonix panels don't use water, a big benefit if you install them in a desert.

100 % replacement cost will be reflected by a higher premium but it will also provide a bigger benefit if there is a claim.

This can be a big benefit if you have a very large home and fear you might not hear an alarm going off elsewhere in the house.

Not exact matches

The combination of CVS Health, the seventh - biggest company in the U.S. by revenue, with Aetna (No. 43 on the Fortune 500) would, if it were to go through, create a corporate behemoth with $ 240 billion in annual revenue across a wide swath of the healthcare continuum, from retail pharmacy and benefit management to insurance.

If you're just going into a market, the question is, what big benefit will your prospects buy into?

Think small Few small U.S. companies currently enjoy the same tax breaks as big ones, so they'll benefit more if Congress approves corporate tax reform.

There is also the «claim now, claim more later» approach, which can also result in bigger lifetime benefits, even if it doesn't always increase monthly benefits.

Although it can be grueling if you don't get enough rest in between trips, think about the big picture and all you could benefit from it if you do it right.

«If it becomes important that either low - or middle - income families benefit significantly and directly from the tax bill in order for it to move forward then I think the child tax credit is going to be a big player in seeing that that happens,» Maag said.

But in general, if your company needs the benefit of a big tax deduction, look into a nonqualified stock - option plan.

Teva, for its part, is headquartered in Israel, though of the three companies, it stands to gain the biggest tax benefit if its proposed acquisition is successful: The company said that buying Mylan would allow it to reap $ 2 billion per year in tax savings and other «cost synergies.»

If you're hiring, the drum - tight talent market for anyone with programming skills should loosen up considerably, although big companies may reap the benefits more than small ones, says Oliver Ryan, founder of the tech recruiting firm Lab 8 Ventures.

Big requests might include topping up EI benefits, so that fathers (and mothers, if companies don't offer it) can afford longer leave and don't have to use up their vacation days.

If you're not sure which way to go, running the numbers is a pretty simple way to see which one's going to give you the biggest benefit.

But if one of the most popular federal programs does survive in its current form — and that is a big if — the average millennial married couple could actually receive nearly double the average Social Security benefits that current retirees collect, according to a...

you'll get a smaller monthly benefit, and if you claim later than full retirement age, you'll get a bigger monthly benefit.

If it's passed as is — and that's a big if, as many Democrats oppose it and some Republicans have questioned whether projected economic growth can offset the loss of revenue from these tax cuts — most Americans could see some benefiIf it's passed as is — and that's a big if, as many Democrats oppose it and some Republicans have questioned whether projected economic growth can offset the loss of revenue from these tax cuts — most Americans could see some benefiif, as many Democrats oppose it and some Republicans have questioned whether projected economic growth can offset the loss of revenue from these tax cuts — most Americans could see some benefit.

A: They're doing a not - bad job of it if that's your goal, to find that big mushy middle where the Liberal party likes to live, where most Canadians or at least a lot of Canadians see themselves: we see the benefits of this industry and want it do continue to prop up our economic success, while we also see that we need to move away from fossil fuels.

That is the big benefit of fixed - rate loans — if interest rates rise, your rate is locked.

If the papers are anything to go by, there's something big - ish in there about «skills» which will no doubt be presented as some massive benefit to the country's middle class (and those trying to join it).

Dan Caplinger: If simply maximizing the dollar amount of Social Security benefits you'll receive over your lifetime isn't exactly what you have in mind, then it can be a big mistake to wait until age 70 to start taking benefits.

The cryptocurrency is worthless, even if blockchain technology could bring significant benefits to investors, said the investment arm of Europe's biggest insurer, which manages almost 500 billion euros ($ 785 billion).

The big benefit is that you have to do the evaluation once and check back every year if it still works for you.

Here are some tips to help you decide if you should delay those benefits to get a bigger paycheck down the road, or if you should retire as soon as possible.

Getting started investing now, even if you're still paying down debt, brings two very big benefits.

If Canada wants to benefit from Asia's development and growth, and remain a relevant and important energy partner in Asia, we must «think big» about exporting to multiple countries within the Asia Pacific, and «think beyond» oil and natural gas to include all of Canada's energy related assets, particularly the renewable and clean technologies that will help Asia mitigate its own climate - change challenges.

Small businesses can benefit big if they're insured by a company that partners with Valen.

But if you are concerned that big stocks are overvalued, consider a broader portfolio such as Vanguard Index Total Stock Market (17.6 %), a fund keyed to the Wilshire 5000 index of virtually all publicly traded stocks in the U.S. With a total - market index fund, you'll benefit proportionally when small stocks bounce back, since they're automatically included in the portfolio package.

However, this isn't the case for everyone, and the benefits might not be as big as you think — especially if you generally itemize deductions every year.

The card's biggest downside is the annual fee, which comes to $ 450, but frequent business travelers should see if the various premium benefits could justify the annual fee.

J.W There are many deductions you can not take if you file married filling separate: Student loan interest deduction,Tax - free exclusion of US bond interest, Tax - free exclusion of Social Security Benefits, Credit for the Elderly and Disabled, Child and Dependent Care Credit, Earned Income Credit, Hope or Lifetime Learning Educational Credits, MFS taxpayers also have lower income phase - out ranges for the IRA deduction Also both claim the standard deduction or both itemize their deductions Big problem is tax liability goes to both husband and wife

If everyone benefits, its not as big a deal.

The Verdict If you're big on making soups, stews, risottos, and the like, make your own stock whenever possible — the benefits are well worth the time and effort and make all the difference in these kinds of dishes.

Maybe the Patriots get the benefit of the doubt on calls, but I think if you look across all the Big 4, every time there is a dynasty, fans complain about that team getting calls.

While Ohtani wouldn't come over if he didn't think that he would benefit personally, the biggest winner will be an owner who gets to pocket the extra salary that he absolutely could have afforded.

if everybody was union the smaller companies could not survive with the higher wages and higher benefits, we would just have big companies.

There is no guarantee that even if a big team spends big money (which is not looking overly likely) that we will be the 3rd team to benefit.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Barkley has the benefit of playing for the second ranked team in the nation, and playing in the Big Ten East, but if Love can somehow keep up his torrid pace, it would be hard to argue against him come December.

Instead of fixating on replacing Giroud to get maybe 4 - 6 extra goals a season (and contrary to accepted popular belief there are very few if any supporters who would be upset if an upgrade came in) why can't we a bit more imaginative about this; conceding 10 less goals could have won us the title just as easily, further refining our balance between defence and attack, building on the cohesion and fledgling confidence we have built - up may, just may, bring bigger benefits than ripping the spine of the team out and starting again.

If Ireland had drawn France under the old system, then I would have no complaints, but the fact that the rules were changed to benefit «bigger» teams like France is what really grates on me.

Big names signings will be expected to come in along with Sterling, if it were to happen, and the move would benefit both parties.

True, Arsenal and Khedira both will benefit from this deal, but it is the Spanish giants who will be the biggest winners if this transfer does go through.

What good are these so called big «five» if the country doesn't benefit whatsoever?