Sentences with phrase «big board like»

It's unlikely that we'll see a return to the April event until the league finally hits the perfect storm of a relatively boring big board like 2013 and a mid-May draft day.

I rarely hear about executive job seekers having luck with the big boards like Monster and CareerBuilder but, you never know, so it probably doesn't hurt to post to them.

Not exact matches

The reason: The biggest investors, like mutual funds and pension funds that held more than half of all outstanding shares, showed no interest in quibbling with boards» compensation committees.

But I've heard CEOs of start - ups as well as big companies talking about how some board member or supplier or somebody is just treating them like shit.

«It's like the big red board at Caesars Palace,» says Stack.

Rather than resist Ackman, a brash, aggressively charming billionaire who likes to make huge bets on big companies and doesn't hesitate to wage proxy battles against those that rebuff him, Penney invited Ackman and Roth to join the board.

Which has led to the installation of ridiculous props in the workplace to make it seem like the work environment is something that it's not: an arcade machine in the corner, a bar and barista by the far wall, big chalkboards or dry erase boards around the office for Millennial employees to write inspirational quotes on.

These may seem like arcane governance issues but they can make a big difference in how a board is run — and how well it acts as an effective control of a company's executives: in this case, both the executive chair and the CEO.

Some big ones are: (a) whether the draft PROMESA legislation raises retroactivity issues that make it unfair to bondholders (including mutual funds and their investors) who may be subject to restructuring ex post without having had notice of that possibility ex ante; (b) relatedly, whether creating a bankruptcy - like restructuring process for Puerto Rico is bad for bondholders because it prevents holdout creditors from holding up restructuring negotiations, (c) how much oversight and sovereignty Puerto Rico should cede (for example, different stakeholders feel differently about the installation of an oversight board); (d) the extent to which austerity measures are feasible and should be imposed [fn1], and (d) and what substantive reforms should be put enacted going forward.

Though, as everyone on these boards know, I'm nothing but a Fox News lover and big, loser troll that pushes MY agenda and MY beliefs on everyone until I FORCE them to be like I AM!

I really like your site and have tried several of your recipes to mixed reviews from my crew — some are big fans (my husband and oldest son) but the younger boys would rather eat the white flour, sugar and oil recipes they are used too... still, I will get everyone on board eventually, but I may need to transition them more gradually.

I know you've been skeptical of Pace (and rightly so in many instances) but I've liked Pace's decisions since the day he came on board (with a few exceptions) and always thought there was a bigger plan... but this year's FA class is a homerun that I think Pace believes in by the way his contracts are structured.

He made a big board just like an NFL team would, but this time it was for schools he was interested in.

Liverpool have a football manager tho arsenal don't Liverpool have a board that spends money if the player is good enough arsenal don't so comparing arsenal to any big club that is run like a big club doesn't work!

I like to mess around with fanspeak and I use the draftek big board.

He seems to hover in the 25 - 40 range on most big boards, but I like him as a top 15 talent overall.

But one thing that I would find more enlightening than a mock would be a discussion of what the big board looks like that underpins this draft — the prioritization of players both by position (G, S, ILB, etc.) and by draft position (Hernandez ranked higher than Rashaad Penny, for example).

Arsenal ba bigger club than Liverpool atm and could easily get somebody like Ancelotti, Klopp if the board actually put in the effort.

kronkes influence over the club is minimal at best how many decisions does he actually make in the public club domain that we all know of, i am only guessing here but just because he is majority shareholder it doesn't mean he can just do what he wants without the other board members say so, i suppose the rest of the board would vote him out of power and liquidate his shares if he did something really wrong like leveraged the club against a big debt.

In wenger we trust COYG u spoilt little brats, you muppets ain't even been tested in your arsenal fan career never seen your club finish lower then fourth every year we play in cl against the big boys and you lot act like were in crisis and things are so bad wow I'm beyond belief just can't get my head around the way you lot act sometimes step back a bit a think a little you twats most of you in your life time have never seen your team finish lower then fourth yes fûc #ing fourth most of you don't even no what it's like to be a real fan wen your team are struggling finishing mid table and still saying you love the club and protect them never in my life have I heard a generation of arsenal fans critise manager players board everything about our club wen things our knowere near as bad as you make out to be and could be.

Arsenal board thought that with the FFP rools salaries and signing fees would go down and all be equal, what with our new stadium with extra incom and new sponsership they thought we will do well without spending big, but unfortunately FIFA is droping FFP they can't control it like they thought Manchester City already saying they are not following rools this season and they are spending big eaven if it means huge fines

I will like to advise arsenal board to invest into goalkeeper situation and four back lines for the next season bcos is the major weakness position for the club have to lost for big matches against rivalry clubs both premier league and champions league.

exactly lets all ley down and die because the board is happy with the income and don't much care for big titles because of the financial cost, and why should they care when the likes of you Budd sport them unconditionally,

As much as I would like to hate your comment above I have to agree with what you've said here I know there are a hardcore of bloggers on here that will be derisory and downright insulting (Keyboard warriors are always really tough) but unless we have the two new additions we need then we will sadly be another fourth spot contender again, its as simple as that the current squad is nearly there but nearly there is not THERE and I hate to say it but I think its gonna be another case of Wenger stubbornly trying to convince the world he is a genius by winning things without spending much OR by lamenting the injury problems and bad refs and being desultory about big oil funded clubs while the Club we love turns a fat profit for the board and we see no silverware at all.

Instead, according to reports from various reliable sources like The Guardian, the Italian and the Chelsea board are at odds over the manager's wish to have a big say on transfers.

If these other big boards that make up the composite represent the non-professional brain - trusts of other teams, does it mean that other teams don't look at their needs like we think they should be (and hence, they're picking guys who we don't thing should be going in the first 12)?

Whether you believe the lack of big spending on transfers like we see all the time from our big rivals in the Premier League is down to the cautious approach of Arsene Wenger, the policy of the Arsenal board or because the man at the top silent Stan Kroenke wants it that way, the results are generally the same.

But after reading after what you all have said, it doesn't sound like he was really that high on the big board.

He may well have a great business head but I'm afraid we have enough of those on the board — we need a coach that wants to win trophies and wants to attract big players to play at this amazing club before it falls on its face like a sketch out of the Keystone Cops!!

The board need to step up and start acting like a board at a big club.

wenegr is in the twilight years of his arsenal career now he might or might not see out the full term of his contract, i would image he wont give up but if he do nt get a big prize this season or next his desire might dwindle even more the board have seen what a shambles man united have gone through and the expense of failure, if they do nt get the next appointment right the board is trying to give themselves as much time to identify a replacement and in the correct time unless wenger leaves at short notice, i think if he had won the c / l all thought years ago we would be looking at a different story i think he would have left at the end if that contract as he would be at the peak of his powers and could of gone anywhere he like across europe, but he didn't win and here we are now, i respect the man for what he has done for us and english football a modern day herbert chapmen he is but even old chappy had his end of and era and wenger will have his end its just how will it play out hopefully a winner

Although I don't want Arsenal to become a big spender like Chelski or Man Shitty, We need a manager who buys the right players and plays them in there respective positions, thats the reason for buying them / Usmanov has the money (more than Abramovich) and should be allowed to either buy the club or sit on the board, it is a disgrace that a man who is Arsenal's 2nd biggest shareholder is disregarded as having any say on Arsenal matters.

Another disgraceful performance came from Wenger and Bould, they just sat there like waxworks dummies they are clueless and both of them should be ashamed for that poor show yesterday.perhaps the biggest disgraceful act was that of the board was to offer Wenger another 2 year contract.

The 7th year big man will look to collect boards like a lumber worker for bettors tonight.

If this is true then we can only hope that Wenger and the board have learned from their struggles to bring players in this time, and that the big spending from the likes of Man City and United will mean that we have less competition for our transfer targets in January.

Signing of Laca was political one to silence the fans just like signing of ozil was.Arsenal board and Wenger are not sincere want to strengthern the team to compete with the best but they only signing for political reasons when they are under pressure to sign big names.They only sign one top player every season to look like they meant business but if left without being pressurized they will never ever signing quality players.they will do just like when the last time when they signed only PETER CECH brainwashed fans that he had quality Squad already..

CB is deeper, sure, but Lattimore will be # 2 on more than a few big boards, and the only other player who could plausibly combine value and need to anything like this extent is Adams.

Much like Cantrell, his jumps were high on the board — but his 4.43 40 was another big help for him.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

The proviso is that the boss and the board change their ways and drag the Gunners back up among the Premier League big hitters and at first it looked like it was going to happen.

What I think is that Wenger should stay to fix d missing tiles, it can be done now, first he needs to understand that you need set of players who can stand the test, like sanchz, koscz, mstafi, ozil, bllern, and few more new faces like these soldiers, not the type of players that cant even give u 20 league matches appearance, either injured or not in form, like walcot, ramsy, Gibbs giroud, matzcker, Gabriel, and Montreal who gifted man u a victoryy they never merited, all this players have let Wenger down big time, but he continues to carry on with most of them just for their loyalty to him and glimpse of flashes they have shown in last 8, 9 or more years, Wenger should decide who should board the ship this time not same weaklings who uses arsenal as a brand just to be noticed but no ambitions

Perhaps the biggest is on the boards: The Lakers rank 20th in securing defensive rebounds, and the Wolves are one of the best offensive rebounding teams in the league thanks to guys like Taj Gibson and Karl - Anthony Towns.

As always, this Mock Draft serves to assess what the big picture looks like on a given day, whereas our Big Board serves as the Front Office's own assessment of available talebig picture looks like on a given day, whereas our Big Board serves as the Front Office's own assessment of available taleBig Board serves as the Front Office's own assessment of available talent.

of course, i get frustrated at the fact we buy 1 decent player and then all the pressure sits on their shoulders i feel for sanchez every game he works his arse off and he looks like he annoyed by some of the other players who ai nt up to it we have a decent squad but we need 1st team cdm and a striker and a decent cb, look at bayern benatia, boateng, martinez, dante all being played at cb but our only decent cb is kos, its not good enough i like mert but he ai nt gonna help us win the league, would love arsene to finish this season with at least 1 more trophy and then try bring in pep guardiola he's the only manager similar to arsenal's style but i think he would need a promise from the board for big funds

We now realise that the «Self - sustaining» model was actually about providing on - going big - money for the board members, getting their fat dividend payments from the super-profitable cash - cow that is AFC, and nothing to do with winning trophies or competing with clubs like Barcelona, Real, Bayern, Chelsea, Man U, Man C, PSG, etc..

the protest IS NOT a violent one (believe me after being in the army for 10 years I know what one of those looks like) ok so the protest may not cause too big a stir in the board room but do we have to sit meekly and just put up and shut up??

Yes those guys were wrong but i fear that as the anger builds up from the fans they may take the next level by beating him up or attacking the players physical.wenger and board have forced the fans to not raise their voices on what they do nt like, but if you look at every big club fans have a say why not at arsenal?

That said we have far bigger problems like a owner and board who do not care about the club and its performance and ambition on the field as long as the bank tills roll.

U are afraid to a change just like the board is... u and ur fears are part of the problem About the topic: Arsenal is one of the richest teams in the world and used to be a big team... so why we have to compare ourself with the smaller teams??

So as the big board falls on my first pick in this round, it looks like this: