A proposal to reduce the amount of ethanol in gas could mean
big changes for gas prices and grocery bills.
Not exact matches
But lackluster spending data may
change: It is hard
for us to believe the
big increases in employment over the past year, together with rises in aggregate wages and the extra disposable income accumulated from the
big drop in
gas prices, will not translate into increased consumer spending.
Or i could point out that the
big bang is the
biggest joke ever told... That even the top physicists can't figure out how their own theory could work, not to mention the fact that
for it to work they would need
for the Universe to break the fundamental laws we understand as true since the beginning i.e. (No matter in the Universe can be created nor destroyed, you can only
change it's state (solid to liquid, liquid to
gas etc.).
PDX — It doesn't take a Genius to realize from my statements that i have read things other than the Bible you moron i have spent many hours reading and listening to scientists about their theories on the
big bang, i have listened to ideas from the most revered scientists including Hawking and others, and they all admit that there are holes in their theories, that nothing fully explains their
big bang theory, the physics doesn't add up let alone the concept, there are plenty of scientists hard at work trying to make the numbers fit and the theory hold weight but if you ask any of them they can not give you the answers and the reason being... there are none, the theory doesn't work, If by the observable laws of Physics, Matter in this Universe can not be created or destroyed, you can only
change its state, i.e. solid to liquid, to
gas... to energy... There is no explanation
for how an entire reality full of Matter can be created out of nothing... Scientists know this... idiots that are atheists and simply would rather NOT believe that their lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT to believe... but Your belief in God does not
change whether or not he exists you will be judged.
There are only two
changes I'd like to see: a
bigger gas tank
for longer range and backlit cruise control buttons on the steering wheel
for night driving.
While some automotive cards offer discounts on
gas or oil
changes, others will provide special financing options to help you pay
for big - ticket repairs.
Also, the utility and oil companies are and will interfere with progress that hurts their bottom line; economics has a place to be sure, but just old fashioned greed hinders progress... still, there are hard working people who support families and citizens who do can not afford any upgrades or
changes, the building of the wind infrastructure is already past a billion dollars and has not brought the efficiency we need to even talk of transitions, and with the 7 - 10 billion dollars car makers are requesting in addition to 20 - 75 billion
for the current production lines to be maintained (and to stop the
big three from filing chapter 11) and the regular
gas powered vehicles to continue in the mainstay, it is not likely the government will have the money (or credit?)
There might be value in a more generic piece focusing on this kind of tension, which is going to be with us
for some time — the slow steady responses predicted by current models, the concern that some observations of faster and
bigger changes might actually be the greenhouse
gas - forced signal and not just internal variability, the patience required before new observations and better theories / models sort things out.
Barring a
big change in technology and regulation on CO2, that trend is hard to square with widely discussed goals
for stabilizing greenhouse
gas concentrations.
Oh, and Andy, by the way, still waiting
for something from you on the extraordinary solar minimum and whether that
big star out there might, just might, have more to do with our climate
change than the tiny CO2 slice of total greenhouse
gases.
2007/04/24: TheAge: Howard undermined on climate The nation's leading scientific body, the CSIRO, has undermined Prime Minister John Howard's position on climate
change by advising that
big cuts in greenhouse
gas emissions appear to be both inevitable and affordable
for Australia.
Posted in Carbon, CLIMATE SCIENCE, Development and Climate
Change, Disaster and Emergency, Disasters and Climate
Change, Ecosystem Functions, Environment, Global Warming, Green House
Gas Emissions, Information and Communication, International Agencies, Land, News, Publication, Research, Resilience, River, Vulnerability, Water Comments Off on Climate
Change May Bring
Bigger Waves
For Down Under
Given that emissions from burning coal are the single
biggest human source of climate
changing greenhouse
gases, the communique says that, the push
for Coal is a betrayal of the commitment and obligation of governments under the United Nations to address climate
change and shift to sustainable pathways.»
Tim Lambert links to this article by Eric Pooley in Slate's The
Big Moneye which points out that,
for all the disagreement among economists regarding the details of climate
change policy, there is substantial consensus on the following main points (i) the cost of action to stabilise atmospheric concentrations of CO2 and other greenhouse
gases will be of the order of 1 per cent of GDP (ii) a strong mitigation policy is preferable to business as usual
Myriam Douo, lobby transparency campaigner
for Friends of the Earth Europe continued: «With ENTSOG there is a clear conflict of interest: members include subsidiaries of
big oil and
gas companies like Engie, OMV, Mol Group, E-On and Gazprom and climate -
change deniers Centrica.
Yesterday was a
big day
for renewable energy and climate
change, as the world's two largest emitters of greenhouse
gases paved the path of cooperation with regard to scaling renewable power.
I congratulate Puget Sound Energy, the Sierra Club, and the other signatories to today's multiparty settlement
for taking a
big step toward reducing greenhouse
gas emissions and fighting climate
change.
Why are the people ringing the alarm
for climate
change and greenhouse
gasses also the
biggest detractors of coal's best alternatives: nuclear and natural
gas??
Even small
changes in the lifecycle emissions figures
for gas would eventually affect policy and incentives
for the utility industry, and ultimately make a
big difference in how
gas stacks up against its alternatives.
Telecommunications, education, and electricity have all been targets, but the sweeping
changes to the oil and
gas business are the most revolutionary — and represent the
biggest opportunity
for Canadian companies.
The resulting Oil &
Gas Global Salary Guide will be released in early 2016 and I'm interested to see in what areas we will see the
biggest changes compared to 2014 and the outlook of the industry
for 2016.
Finance, Marketing, Media, Digital, Professional Services, FMCG, Technology,
Big Data, Telecommunications, Project /
Change Management, Financial Transformation, Legal, Insurance, CSR & Sustainability, Multi-lingual positions, Investment Banking, Creative, PR, Financial Services, Consultancy, Life Sciences, Pharmaceutical, Medical Sales, Logistics / Supply Chain, Property, Not -
for Profit, Oil,
Gas & Energy.
When future contracts
for natural
gas, copper, etc are worth 2009 levels yet your bill did nt
change, somebody is making
big margins, and it isnt the end user.