Using the sun to power the equipment obviously yields
big emissions benefits.
Not exact matches
As the
biggest station operator and supplier of natural gas for transportation in the U.S., the company should
benefit from higher oil prices and more focus on reducing
emissions likely to drive many truck operators to consider this new engine.
Methane
emissions from
big hydroelectric dams in the tropics outweigh the
benefits that this form of renewable energy provides, according to new scientific data
Well all bets are with the» so called» president in the oval office all semblance of fuel economy and efficiency are about to go out the window as he rips the EPA to shreds to the
benefit of
Big Oil... that at least here in the (not so) Good (anymore) Ole US of A
bigger will reign supreme with concerns about efficiency and
emissions once again going by the wayside.
Coupled with efficient four - cylinder engines, that promises
big benefits for Merc's fleet - average C02
emissions.
There's still a
big mess of auto parts to clean up,
emissions have not been significantly lowered, and the economy may not have
benefited much at all.
Mercury, like other heavy metals is insidious and mercury
emissions lead to deaths and dumbness (the later especially for the young) so as Dave Roberts puts it, this is a
big deal with major
benefits.
Since then, many attempts have been made to read the tea leaves in hopes of predicting what approach EPA will take to regulate carbon dioxide
emissions from existing power plants — the
big fish in terms of potential pollution
benefits (86 % of U.S.
If Chevron, or any named
Big Oil codefendant can show that the externalities of CO2
emissions are of net
benefit, could they countersue entities that have suppressed CO2
emission, or
benefited from CO2
emissions, & thereby place liens & seize the assets of companies selling carbon credits, or of any tangible real property associated with past ill - gotten carbon taxation & regulation?
If indeed he has business interests that somehow
benefit from the IPCC's work, it's bizarre that the UK wingnut press happily reports that his «business interests» (actually looks more like a
big research lab) were funded by the Tata Group, who stand to lose
big time if there are serious moves to cut
emissions.
Jon Sanderman, a co-author with Griscom, as well as a soils experts at Massachusetts» Woods Hole Research Center, said skeptical farmers are coming to understand that natural techniques used to sequester soil carbon and reduce agricultural
emissions also end up
benefiting soil health, water retention and crop yields, thus promoting food security — a
big worry in developing countries.