(i) The most infamous
big money case dealing with needs is McCartney v Mills McCartney where the wife's needs were «a factor of magnetic importance».
The background to the case — another exercise of judicial discretion in another «not very
big money case» — is dealt with later.
Expert witnesses for
big money cases can be expected to fly anywhere to testify.
For reasons he does not explain, Wilson LJ assumes that applications will relate only to «
big money cases» — his term.
(iv) In cases other than
big money cases where continuing periodical payments are necessary and the wife has sacrificed her earning capacity, compensation will rarely be amenable to consideration as a separate element in the sense of a premium susceptible of calculation with any precision.
(iii) In
big money cases where a clean break can be achieved a wife with ordinary career prospects is likely to have been compensated by an equal division of the assets and consideration of how the wife's career might have progressed is unnecessary and should be avoided.
Greenfield warns lawyers who are anxiously sitting by silent telephones to avoid falling for the flawg pitches of «the smiling marketers, the SEO salesmen, the schemers who claim they have
big money cases just waiting for you to sign onto their network.
We suggest that we should we go further and complain that the voice of the minority of lawyers only looking after
bigger money cases is too loud in the babble from which reform may emerge.
Then two points specific to
big money cases: (iv) «Dynastic» trusts will not impact upon the outcome if they have not been properly set up.
In
these big money cases, spending a shed load of wonga on expert evidence is all in a day's work.
If this court now concludes that all these cases were wrongly decided they present an open road and a fast car to the money maker who disapproves of the principles developed by the House of Lords that now govern the exercise of the judicial discretion in
big money cases.»
This article shall explore income needs in cases involving substantial assets (known as
big money cases) and will focus on the factors a court takes into account when considering needs and investigating the importance, for family practitioners, of constructing a carefully considered budget and the consequences of failing to do so.
A schedule of
big money cases in which budgets have been «pruned» appears below, together with an analysis of the treatment of budgets in those cases.
«I emphasise that all judges who have endeavoured to achieve fairness in
big money cases at first instance... have followed the pathway marked by Cumming - Bruce LJ, himself a former judge of the [Family] Division.
Not exact matches
Talk about how that card ties in — that
money comes out of your checking account, and in the
case of
bigger purchases, that you've planned and saved for that.
«Securing a home equity line of credit, but not using it initially, is one way to give yourself easy access to
money in
case of unemployment or
big bills,» said Holden Lewis, research analyst at NerdWallet.
The good news is that clever startups are coming to market with
big new ideas intended not only to change the way small businesses handle
money, but in some
cases to also cut out
big, bad, TARP - grabbing traditional banks altogether.
Miller says the stocks are volatile because the start - ups going public today have faster growth, and
bigger revenues, even if in many
cases they're losing
money.
«Any of these
big cases they'll drag it and drag it until you're out of
money and have to give up,» he said.
* In
case you're wondering McKean's four things that investors want is: Your bio (especially with a startup, VCs want to see whether you are worthy of
money, as well as your idea); momentum (you must show growth);
money (you should have cash in the bank); and market (you need to have a
Big Idea).
But the revelation this week that Mr. Thiel was covertly backing Mr. Bollea's
case as well as others has raised a series of new questions about the First Amendment as well as about the role of
big money in the court system — specifically the emerging field of litigation finance, in which third parties like hedge funds and investment firms pay for other people's lawsuits.
Mr.
Case and Mr. Vance hope to seed investments in start - ups in underserved cities and then bring in some of their
big names to invest even more
money in them.
In some
cases, there is a
big difference between (A) the amount of
money you can comfortably afford to pay each month, and (B) the maximum amount the lender is willing to give you.
This is a
big problem in many countries because the rates on the peer to peer market (including tellers in this
case) are sometimes abusive, and can easily be higher than the fees regular companies such as Western Union and
Money Gram charge.
«In most
cases they're coming from much more expensive markets, and in some
cases are just trying to get
money out of the country to a safe haven,» he said, adding that China's stepped - up restrictions on the outflow of capital has probably had a
bigger impact.
Whether we want it to be the
case or not,
money plays a
big role in determining whether or not we can maximize our potential.
It is clear that
money transfers play an important role in every broker's review and in this
case, it is a
big advantage.
In any
case, there is no shame in pursuing
big money — notwithstanding the series's intermittent and heavy - handed comparisons of SC&P to a bordello.
I personally think he needs to bulk up some... Bielek is earning rave reviews though and his progression is going as planned, Akpom needs a proper talking to, his problem is more attotude than lack of ability, just like Gnabry, I think because both had a run with the senior squad they feel like they are
big enough to.command regular shirts where they play which is not the
case, you have to earn the right to play on a Saturday afternoon, its never handed out to you... all in all, its been a disastrous season for us of you look at progress Te English players are making at Spuds whilst our» s sit on their asses earning ridiculous
money for doing eff all....
Not the
case at ALL other
big clubs, because they expect progress straight away, especially considering the amount of
money they spend.
Just in
case the ramblings are clear enough ladies and gents; If we are a
big club then why the hell aren't we spending the
money, or better yet if we don't have the
money why aren't you actively scouting players from the goddamn rainforest if need be, who have talent instead of commentating on the Euros and turning up to games with players we are linked with and you damn well know we ain't signing.
While Higuain's credentials stand alone as impressive, there's also a strong
case for signing him to improve both the morale and the potential of last summer's
big -
money signing Angel Di Maria.
It's that compliance attitude which has allowed the club to not try and assemble
bigger names and in some
cases bigger egos as they know that they'll have to pay more
money and be a lot more ambitious as a club / employer.
This applies especially in the
cases of Perez and Debuchy who are definitely being paid far in excess of what they could get in Spain or France unless they were taken in by a very
big team with more
money than sense.
Obviously in the
case of the UFC, the
big money being made isn't all going back into the company (as may be the
case with your studio) to pay fighters, employees and to put on
bigger and
bigger events.
With more
money than sense, the Hammers love a
big name if they can manage it, but in this
case there seems some potential for things to really work out.
There is no doubt that Bale needs to get the hell out of Real if he ever wants to be the kind of player he once was... this isn't to suggest that he his skills have diminished, he simply isn't the fiery, determined and aggressive player that struck fear in the hearts of his opponents... the small fish in a
big pond just doesn't fit his profile... I can't even remember the last player I've seen who has become so invisible on the
big stage (maybe Pogba last year)... maybe it's a
case of culture shock or maybe he wasn't able to handle the notoriety that invariably came with his
big money signing, but regardless of how it happened this guy is a shadow of his former self... although I doubt he would ever come to a team in such disarray, he could quite easily fill the shoes of Sanchez, who ironically was in a similar predicament in Barcelona, as Bale would return to his favoured left side and would be given the same freedoms that have allowed Sanchez to flourish... ultimately I think the cache of wearing a Real jersey and competing for the top trophies would be too difficult to give up for a wannabe club run by suits who care little about those kinds of accolades
Plus, and this is a
big one, suppose one of those guys get injured or drop form etc. in that
case, there won't be a ton of teams lining up to sign them for
big money at all.
So if you are looking for a Christmas present for a West Ham fan, and don't want to spend
big money for a piece of the Upton Park turf in a glass
case, or a plastic seat from the stands, then look no further.
Though I think everyone could care less about winning the
money over the «
Big Ears» Daniele De Rossi would be holding in his hands, in that
case.
It is far more likely that we'll see a
big money defensive - midfielder come in rather than a centre - forward, and if that is the
case, these bargain buys would help to complete a perfect transfer window for The Gunners.
Tony does seem to confuse spending as a short term solution (which is certainly proven to be ineffective in the majority of
cases) with the year on year mega
money that's been thrown around by the
big 3 here and by others like PSG.
With the reduced revenue we won't have the
money to buy
big players in any
case, so it is a vicious cycle as we spiral down without
big players further and further away from the Champions League every year.
We saved
money and we don't have a
big chunk of plastic sitting around catching dust in
case we have another child before the seat expires (or worse — sitting in a landfill).
All this will be the
case in the fall too when the vastly
bigger and more complicated Obama and Romney campaigns and their many allies square off for the Presidential Election, drawing on
money and manpower from around the country but focusing their efforts on a dozen or so swing states.
Case in point: While the 2002 McCain - Feingold law was supposed to put an end to the influence of
big money in politics, eager donors turned to independent expenditures financed through Super PACs as a way to conduct unlimited political advertising.
Court papers in the two
cases suggest that testimony in Federal District Court will expose in granular detail what watchdog groups say is a seamy world where
big money and politics have long intersected with government.
Krissy's lawyer's time would have been more in the public interest if she had tried to stop Shelly Silver from spending taxpayers
money to pay off a sexual harasssment
case against one of the
biggest slugs in the legislature, Vito Lopez.
The facts of this
case are clear: the ex-banker tasked with cutting Britain's
biggest peacetime Budget deficit handed more than # 40,000 of taxpayers»
money to his boyfriend, despite parliamentary rules banning MPs from paying rent to partners.
It's going to be
big money and
big donations because the federal law guarantees that with this Citizens United
case, which has institutionalized
big anonymous
money.»