To keep
the big polar ice sheets largely intact and prevent massive flooding will require limiting warming to just 2 °C.
Not exact matches
«And it is in fact a fact that the
polar ice caps are
bigger today than they were before,» Cruz said in a video distributed by 350.org, an environmental advocacy group.
Global warming has caused
big problems for
polar bears, which depend on sea
ice for access to the ocean so they can hunt seals and other prey.
Before the melt, when they were hunting on stable sea
ice, the
polar bears had a
big advantage over their favoured prey.
There is rising concern among
polar bear biologists that the
big recent summertime retreats of sea
ice in the Arctic are already harming some populations of these seal - hunting predators.
What most people seem to forget here, is that on one hand there are fundamental thermodynamical arguments which demand that hurricane intensity increase over time, while on the other hand, there are these two
big chunks of
ice sitting in both
polar regions, which will counteract the warming process in their own special way.
Imagine being that
polar bear, having endured a life - threatening swim created by ever - distant
ice floes created by our global warming, only to finally find a nice
big chunk of
ice where he could finally go fishing, only to confront and be murdered by enemy no. 1: mankind, in this case Icelanders.
(Keep in mind that almost all Arctic sea
ice researchers add a
big caveat when talking of an «
ice - free Arctic Ocean,» noting that a
big region of thick floes north and west of Greenland will almost surely persist in summers through this century, which is one reason some scientists have proposed targeting
polar bear conservation efforts there.)
It was the warming of the
polar ice caps that became the greatest concern, since this was the first tangible evidence, and will have the
biggest initial impact upon coastal cities and low lying countries.
Tagged Arctic, attacks,
biggest threat, Churchill, facts,
ice growth, last glacial maximum, minimum,
polar bear,
polar bear alert, population size, problem bears, Refuge, resilience, sea
ice, September, summer, thick spring
ice
If you'll recall from my previous post,
polar bears seem to have barely survived the extensive sea
ice coverage during the Last Glacial Maximum — in other words, too much
ice (even over the short term) is their
biggest threat.
A team of international scientists is due to set off for the world's
biggest iceberg, fighting huge waves and the encroaching Antarctic winter, in a mission aiming to answer fundamental questions about the impact of climate change in the
polar regions.The scientists, led by the British Antarctic Survey (BAS), are trying to reach a newly revealed ecosystem that had been hidden for 120,000 years below the Larsen C
ice shelf on the Antarctic peninsula.In July last year, part of the Larsen C
ice shelf calved away, forming a huge iceberg - A68 - which is four times
bigger than London, and revealing life beneath for the first time.
Not only that, but if rising CO2 levels were responsible for the decline of sea
ice and implied effects on
polar bears since 1979 (when CO2 levels were around 340 ppm), why has spring
ice extent been so variable since 1989 (when the first
big decline occurred) but so little changed overall since then?
The
Polar bears stubbornly refuse to go extinct, indeed the buggers are thriving, the glaciers don't appear to be disappearing, sea levels have stayed boringly level, we haven't been subsumed by hordes of desperate climate refugees, the
polar ice caps haven't melted, the Great Barrier Reef is still with us, we haven't fought any resource wars, oil hasn't run out, the seas insist on not getting acidic, the rainforest is still around, islands have not sunk under the sea, the ozone holes haven't got
bigger, the world hasn't entered a new
ice age, acid rain appears to have fallen somewhere that can't quite be located, the Gulf Stream hasn't stopped, extreme weather events have been embarrassingly sparse in recent years and guess what?
«If climate change is an elaborate hoax, then the
ice sheets must be in on it; the sea level must be in on it; and the
polar bears are likely in on it, although they are
big losers.»
Some bad news for migrating seabirds: shrinking Arctic
ice has left
polar bears scrambling to find food, and they've taken to eggs in a
big way.
Big Government,
Big Journalism, Environment, Arctic, Climate Change, George Monbiot, Global Warming,
Ice Age, Paul Homewood,
polar vortex, Steve Goddard
30 March, 2017 — NASA scientists say that in the last six months the world has lost an area of
polar sea
ice that is
bigger than Mexico.