Sentences with phrase «big scoring numbers»

Often a high use player will have big scoring numbers but bad averages, Taylor had high numbers and really good percentages.

Not exact matches

A recent report by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau outlined a number of problems it found with the big three consumer reporting companies along with suggested reforms that could help consumers improve the accuracy of their own credit reports as well as those all - important three - digit scores.

Take a look at the example FICO ® Scores report and you can see that it shows your FICO ® Scores in big bold numbers as well as a general indication of how your score relates to other U.S. consumers (poor to exceptional).

Maybe if I wanted to be critical I could say that that there is too big a difference between the number of chances we created and the number of goals we scored but that will come quickly once you win your games at home.»

The 14 - year - old scored 89 goals last season for the French side's youth teams, and in turn is unsurprisingly being watched carefully by a number of big clubs.

«We had a big differential this season between the number of chances we created at home and the number of goals we scored, which was not the case last year,» he said.

We came out of a very difficult period where there was a big difference between the chances created and the number of goals we scored.

Wenger said, «It's very unusual because we have a big deficit between chances created and the number of goals we've scored.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

this window has just finished i am already thinking about who we will get for the january window we might try for khedira on a really low offer as he is free agent almost would help boost numbers in midfield in the new year as we will no doubt need to filling the numbers about then also i will hold my hands up and say i was wrong this morning for giving wenger stick and saying welbeck is rubbish i have been out in the cold light of day and had a chance to reevaluate the situation and realized that this could be a canny shrew transfer on wenger behalf actually if wenger can turn the clock back and work his magic on welbeck and get him scoring goals and improve his game then we could have a great underrated signing on our hands its wengers absolute trust in him that might be what makes him a great player as this is something that he never had at old mordor if anybody can make him a world beater wenger can he loves this little pet projects improving players against the odds welbeck has the skillset to be high class player upfornt he just needs to work very hard on his finishing i think once he gets a few goals under his belt he will settle in fine and he is a team player you could put him on the left against man city to shore up that side and he will put in a great shift without a complaint that could be his biggest asset to us or on the right whenever we need him there ithinkwenger might start himon the left against city to protect the left back against navas and i bet you if he does a great job we will take a shine to him quickly i am hopeing he will be one of those wenger gems that he finds and polishes up to a high finish i must admit i was annoyed as some other gunners were at not signing d / m and c / h but if wenger does win the league with this lot it will be his greatest win yet and what might play in to our hands is the unpredictable nature of the league in the last few seasons if we get on a good run at the right time we might be hard to stop look at city they should have never lost to stoke but the result is there in black and white for all to see and i think chelsea will hit the skids after a while to just because cesc and costa are doing well now thats there main threat but teams will work out how to stop them as the season goes on and chelsea will become predictable i think we might just do well this season after all

Reggie Perry is a 6» 9 big man who is going to put up consistent scoring and rebounding numbers for Mississippi State while surprising some people with his face - up game.

LF Gary Sheffield, 31, Dodgers [SKINNY] Darin Erstad, down the freeway in Anaheim, is a hit machine, yet Sheffield still has a higher on - base percentage and has scored more runs while putting up the biggest power numbers of his career.

Granted, the bigger problem in that game was the number of scoring opps — Louisville had 10 to FSU's five in a 63 - 20 romp — but it was indicative of an ongoing issue.

The chance to score in a big game like the one against Chelsea on Sunday at Wembley could be restricted to a few number of chances.

It's understandable that fans have flocked to don his number 17 after more than justifying his big money move, scoring 18 goals.

The debut of Nikko Robertson saw him lead the league this week with 31 monstrous points, while Rodney Clark continues to put up big numbers of his own, scoring 19.

This Game was a battle with players Tyler Max and Scott Fenton putting up big numbers scoring 22 and 19.

These players have all posted big numbers this season for high - powered offenses, and those high - scoring games have been an interesting storyline this year.

lets not point guns at wenger yes he is too simple on players but why do nt we look at players who are not arsenal quality d players who do nt know the value of being at a big club like arsenal talking of giroud who on average scores 13.6 goals per season and yet you have the best midfielders in the league and probably the best number 10 in the world who creates 400 chances of scoring goals and you utilize only 13.6.

The Egypt international's 32nd goal of the campaign — the same number Newcastle have managed in all competitions this season — was the 26th competitive club match he has scored in, eclipsing the likes of Paris Saint - Germain's Edinson Cavani (24) and Barcelona's Lionel Messi (20) in the big five leagues.

Now I fully understand that these differences really only show up over a larger number of games but it surely suggests that if Santi's presence does indeed mean that we create, over the long haul, one more big chance per game than I don't think it's unreasonable to presume that if over those three games we did create thee more big chances that we would have scored one more goal and actually won one of those games.

The 25 - year - old has scored five goals and provided nine assists this season, and his agent confirmed this week he has received interest from a number of «big teams».

Week after week, even after it was readily apparent that Indy was a scoring machine and nobody could slow down Peyton Manning, the Colts weren't getting saddled with a big number.

He'll hopefully score a good number of goals and show the entire Juve cast of talent evaluators that he is ready for the big stage.

A period of sustained pressure, with a number of resulting corners, ended with the bigger of the two substitutes scoring the winner - much to the joy of players and supporters alike.

The other is that people score better when the ratio of the bigger number to the smaller one is greater.

Black Panther also scored a $ 40.1 million domestically its first week, the biggest Monday performer of all time, and racked up an even bigger second weekend with $ 111.6 million, placing it at number two of all time — behind, that's right, The Force Awakens.

This game includes PAC - MAN Championship Edition 2, which features a number of gameplay modes including Score Attack mode, Adventure mode and big boss battles, giving players endless opportunity to build on and improve their skills.

got their nominations by virtue of expectation; of course Spielberg's big movie gets a score nomination, and of course John Williams is going to be nominated for writing Star Wars music again, despite the fact that both felt more than a little by - the - numbers in their execution.

Russell Crowe and Ryan Gosling's latest comedy isn't scoring big numbers at the box office but it has become a critical darling.

Several critical darlings get shut out, while a number of relatively unknown projects score big

«Arbitrage» (Roadside Attractions and Lionsgate) Also scoring good numbers in its second weekned was «Arbitrage,» which was coming off the biggest opening ever for a film opening in both movie theaters and On Demand.

To that end, there are a number of big - studio players critics didn't exactly warm up to, that could nevertheless score.

Smith and Sonnenfeld scored big with Men In Black, and it seems that a number of people were trying to recapture this success.

With mountains of learning data at our disposal and an easy way to visualize it, we can make big changes to an education system that still turns out large numbers of folks who undervalue their intelligence based on their test scores.

At a time when teachers» unions are being bashed, budgets are shrinking, and the big funders are demanding that every teacher be measured by their test scores, it seems only fair to ask: What do the numbers tell us about student learning?

At no time did the right - wing or the «reformers» admit that poverty, language barriers and the number of students needing special education services are the three biggest predictors of test score results.

There's a stark difference between the city's overall opt out numbers and the state's, and it's certainly true that parents at some schools in wealthier neighborhoods, whose schools can count on high test scores (as they are largely correlated with socioeconomic status), may have more time, a bigger platform to speak up, and, above all, more access to accurate information about the tests, their impacts and the right to refuse them.

First and most importantly, the ES300h scores big EPA numbers.

This means indy books with small ratings numbers will score high on friends / family & fanatics, whereas big 5 books with a large public will be more reasonably rated.

Any erroneous information, including data errors like account numbers and balances that are misreported, has the potential to affect your credit score in a big way.

The number of consumers who will see a bigger bump in their score is small, FICO said, because most consumers who have a tax lien or judgment on their file still have other derogatory indicators such as collections or serious delinquencies on their credit file, which will remain after the public record information is removed.

There is too much at stake to leave up to chance if you go with one of the big guys who might just end up treating you like a number and throwing your credit score into the same campaign as everyone else.

A score of 850 is the highest FICO score you could get, for example, but that number wouldn't be quite as impressive on the TransRisk Score (developed by TransUnion, one of the big three credit reporting agencies), which goes all the way up toscore of 850 is the highest FICO score you could get, for example, but that number wouldn't be quite as impressive on the TransRisk Score (developed by TransUnion, one of the big three credit reporting agencies), which goes all the way up toscore you could get, for example, but that number wouldn't be quite as impressive on the TransRisk Score (developed by TransUnion, one of the big three credit reporting agencies), which goes all the way up toScore (developed by TransUnion, one of the big three credit reporting agencies), which goes all the way up to 900.

It doesn't seem like a simple three - digit number would have that much impact on how you manage your money, but your score shapes whether you're able to make a big purchase or qualify for the best rates on loans.

Now, one of the biggest misperceptions surrounding the credit industry is that when you check your credit score, that number is the ONLY number.

A number, called your debt - to - credit ratio, is a big part of your credit score.

There are a number of reasons that credit cards are such a big part of your credit score:

Take a look at the example FICO ® Scores report and you can see that it shows your FICO ® Scores in big bold numbers as well as a general indication of how your score relates to other U.S. consumers (poor to exceptional).

Lucy Dodsworth from On The Luce scored some big numbers with her custom itinerary suggestions for rail trips through Europe, taking the first place position by a landslide.