Sentences with phrase «big spend requirements»

This card is awful in so many ways: no sign - up bonus, lousy transfer partners, lousy transfer rates, big spend requirements, big annual fee.

I'll do it a few times a year to meet a big spending requirement, but that's it.

However, many require big spending requirements.

Not exact matches

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

So spending big money is NOT a requirement to be successful.

Curiosity aside, spending big money on Proxima b may eventually become an existential requirement.

He says, for instance, that NCLB is too strict and is underfunded, that its more controversial requirements are unworkable and should be scrapped, that only big new state spending can help kids pass exit exams, and that school choice is unproved and dangerous.

Typically, there's a minimum spending requirement you'll have to meet to qualify for the bonus, but if you're planning a big trip, snagging those extra rewards shouldn't be a problem.

The biggest draw here is the 100,000 points you'll earn for meeting the spending requirement — a significant increase both over the standard offer of 50,000 points and the previous increased sign - up bonuses 80,000 points (with a lower minimum spend).

One of the biggest concerns folks have about signing - up for credit cards is meeting the minimum spending requirements.

Hitting credit card spending requirements with tuition payments There is one case in which it might be worth it to pay a large bill, such as a tuition payment, with a rewards - earning credit card, even if there is a fee: when you are trying to meet a minimum spending requirement to trigger a big sign - up bonus.

Big spend bonuses are granted when you meet a large spending requirement; they're different from a sign - up bonus that must be reached within the first few months of signing up.

Hot Tip: The Ink Business Preferred ℠ Credit Card comes with a big sign - up bonus, so make sure you hit the minimum spend requirement within the allotted time (often 3 months) to ensure you receive the bonus.

Typically, there's a minimum spending requirement you'll have to meet to qualify for the bonus, but if you're planning a big trip, snagging those extra rewards shouldn't be a problem.

Taking advantage of limited time offers is a big strategy of mine, and while I think Ultimate Rewards are more valuable (more on that later), the Citi Thank You Premier card currently has a better offer of 50,000 points, as well as a lower minimum spending requirement.

These also sometimes come with bigger minimum spend requirements that may be difficult for some people without real business expenses to meet.

I like that I earn miles based on distance rather than amount spent and there isn't a dollar amount requirement, unlike the big 3.

Using RoomiPay to hit a minimum spend requirement and earn a sign - up bonus is obviously going to have the biggest impact.

One of the biggest hurdles to getting those fat 40,000 - 100,000 point or mile sign - up bonuses are «minimum spend requirements» — you know, the base amount you have to spend in the first three months to get the points or miles.

As suggested above, a big part of this whole travel hacking strategy boils down to finding a way to reach those spend requirements without spending money you wouldn't have otherwise.

I'm a big fan of the AAdvantage ® Aviator ™ Red World Elite Mastercard ® because you don't have to worry about hitting a «true» spending requirement.

In general, the bigger the bonus, the higher the spending requirement, says Gary Leff, who writes about frequent travel at View from the Wing.

It's a targeted offer that comes with a hefty spending requirement, but considering that you can only get these offers once per lifetime, it makes sense to apply for the biggest offer.

American Express have offered $ 15 off $ 50 + before (twice), obviously this offer is better as it's a bigger discount and same spend requirement.

Most of the time, to receive a big sign - up bonus, you have to reach a minimum spending requirement, depending on your specific card.

For the rare few of us that max out our MQM earnings through spend each year, the new MQD requirement isn't that big of a deal.

While this is a really big bonus — one of the largest currently available — $ 7,500 is a really steep spending requirement that, by our estimates, exceeds the budgets of the majority of cardholders.