If someone from
a big trad publishing house came knocking on my door (metaphorically - speaking) offering a generous contract for one of my books... I would turn it down.
But
the big trad published books quote from mixed reviews all the time.
Not exact matches
One of the
biggest problems with
trad publishing is definitely the timing.
Literary fiction never did well in indie
publishing because it depends on reviews from the
big, well known journals like the New Yorker, the NYT book review, the TLS, the Guardian, the NY Review of Books, etc, and they only review
trad pub.
Another question: do you think the discounting by Amazon could be on purpose, because they noticed
big publishing was practicing deep discount conditions with Amazon's discounts, and Amazon knew the more discounting it would do, the more
trad pub and hybrid authors would be screwed, and tempted to become only self -
published authors?
These are good points, but don't take into consideration a
big change in
trad publishing: the author is increasingly responsible for marketing and branding.
It contrasts with the
trad publishing /
big bookstore business model, where a book is a short - lived «event», sometimes lasting no more than three months.
It's all those ostriches and lemmings in
trad publishing, at least with the
Big 5 and their ilk.
Still, it amazes me that
trad publishing, especially the
Big 5, continue to refuse to admit that times and tech and customer demands have changed.
Trad - Pub Authors: Launch
Big or Die In 2012, Rachelle Gardner noted the typical advance for a first - time traditionally
published author is $ 5,000 - $ 15,000 per book, and most of those first - time authors do not sell through their advance, so that is all the money they will ever get from that book.
Without
big publishers entering the game (only around 3 % of the titles on KU are not self -
published), KU is only opening the gap wider between
trad and self
publishing.
I wanted to thank you, not just for this article but for all your articles that try to understand the «
big picture» of
trad and digital
publishing, and the evolving landscape for indie authors.
Trad publishing also does not ensure quality or diversity - these are
big businesses that want what sells to the masses.
Because the excluded publishers are basically all of the
big five plus the
biggest academic publisher — between them responsible for 80 % of the entire
trad publishing market.
I have had over 50 books
published in non-fiction (textbooks) with a
big US publisher so I'm pretty familiar with
trad publishers and I have to say Amazon
Publishing seems to get it as you say.
Trad publishing takes on many forms, and the farther one gets from the
big pubbers the more difficult to see the return to the author, no?
Book typos and errors can be embarrassing and frustrating, but it shouldn't be (as long as you're having your work professionally edited and proofread) since a perfect, book typo / error - free novel seems like an impossible feat to accomplish, no matter if you're self -
published,
trad -
published, or if you're a struggling writer or a bestselling writer, even the
biggest names in fiction get dinged with errors and typos.
Of course, the
trad published authors of the
Big 5 get less than $ 44,22 a day on average (because the
Big 5 take a huge part), but for me, it is proof that Kindle Unlimited makes it harder for an author to make a living.
What I want to say is this is matter between
trad authors,
trad publishers, and Amazon, there's no reason for customers and self
publish authors to meddle or dictate how much
big trad publishers SHOULD sell their own ebooks.
I took a couple of digs at the
Big Five too, but notably not a single fellow gatekeeper felt the need to come forth and defend «
trad»
publishing.
It seems that in most
trad publishing arrangements there is an agent involved, and 15 % less in the pockets of
trad authors is a pretty
big shift in the figures you calculate.