Not exact matches
Michael Smith and Rahul Telang — two professors at Carnegie Mellon University's Heinz College of Public
Policy and Management — explore these questions
in their new book, Streaming, Sharing, Stealing:
Big Data and the
Future of Entertainment, published by MIT Press last month.
The speech goes on to suggest that even if the recent volatility was not a reflection of fundamentals, it is worth ensuring that all the information has been extracted from it and that the
big policy questions that are «lurking» have been considered, as they may play a role
in future bouts of market nervousness.
but a t some point he lost it, and is not because of his stinginess to buy players, our core is good and has been for sometime now, his
biggest problem was adaptation, change to the new EPL, his philosophy dating back 20 years does not work anymore and he knows it, because of this his
biggest flaw all others came out to light, lack of rotation of his players favoring some over others, stubbornness that applies to his transfer
policy buying for the
future just as he had 20 more years ahead, players playing out of their natural positions, ARSENAL FLOPS who knows under other Managers they could have been great, for some reason they were signed
in the first place, they must had some talent, best example is Campbell....
Critics will accuse the PM of being
in the pockets of
big business, but the principles are clear: tight fiscal
policy, loose monetary
policy, and open door to inward investment, thanks to a competitive tax regime and world - class schooling for
future generations.
«Winning more parliamentary seats will ensure a smooth passage of bills by the president
in future and implementing
policies will not face challenges since he has the
bigger representation».
New York is short $ 4.4 billion, and there's uncertainty over federal
policies, including the overhaul of the tax code, that could leave the state with even a
bigger budget hole
in the
future.
The «nitty - gritty» of how patents are developed and then protected is a
big issue when it comes to the role technology can play
in the
future of energy security and climate change
policy, for example.
«The average legislator who has to make
policy on things that influence our lives, our kids» lives, our
future, would they ever get a job
in the private sector making
policy on
big things?
Of course, formal
policy proposals and campaign platforms are still far
in the
future, so most
big donors are hedging their bets — contributing to multiple candidates or hanging back entirely.
As the state and federal governments continue to pursue
policies that threaten the city's fiscal
future, Mayor Bill de Blasio again said he is investing
in making New York City the «fairest
big city
in America» as he proposed spending $ 88.67 billion for the next city fiscal year, which begins July 1.
He said the centre ground should be discussing issues such as the role of technology and
big data
in public services, the use of monetary
policy such as quantitative easing and the
future of student debt.
We made a point of trying to get away from the campaign to cover the choice: the 6 and 10 did a series on
big issues, from airports to defence spending to social care, that weren't getting much play
in the campaign; Newsnight interrogated the
future of the NHS; Andrew Neil's series of Daily Politics debates analysed
policy, department by department over two weeks; and, online, from Reality Check to constituency profiles, we scrutinised the detail.
The very
big plus side was being right
in the centre of decision - making on the
future of UK biomedical science, and, on the international scene, the
policy - making behind the EU's Framework Programmes.
Co-author Dr Iain Staffell, from the Centre for Environmental
Policy, said: «This tool allows us to combat one of the
biggest uncertainties
in the
future energy system, and use real data to answer questions such as how electricity storage could revolutionise the electricity generation sector, or when high - capacity home storage batteries linked to personal solar panels might become cost - effective.»
While education reformers and
policy makers grapple with
big fixes and the politics of national initiatives, most teachers and parents share the simple and urgent desire for students — especially those from low - income communities — to be on the road to college and ultimately to develop into people who will be equipped to thrive
in the unpredictable
future ahead of them.
In September
Big Change convened a group of leading thinkers, influencers and
policy experts from across a diverse range of sectors for a breakfast hosted by Lord Jim Knight, Andreas Schleicher (OECD), and Holly Branson to discuss the
future of education.
So while times like the Eemian or Pliocene or Miocene may be interpreted as a warning call
in some respects, it is not really good to determine threshold
policy targets, or give substantial weight to answering
big questions like
future sea level change, based solely on these analogs.
If the plan
in SKIL Note 41 creates a majority of people who believe «having a second child creates a
bigger liability
in future conditions» than «the liability created by parental lose of procreative choice,» then a new vote would elevate social, physically, or operationally coercive OCPF
policy above individual rights.
We're the ones who are going to be left to deal with these messes as the old guard dies off; maybe we should have a
bigger say
in the
policies made now that will affect our
futures more than those of older Americans.
The
biggest difference between a universal life
policy and a whole life
policy is you can stop paying your life insurance premiums with a universal life
policy in the
future.
The savings you get with a cut - rate insurance
policy might result
in big medical bills
in the
future.
The proceeds from a life insurance
policy can be used for a multitude of purposes — including paying off
big debts, the payoff of an insured's funeral and other final expenses, and / or for the payment of loved ones» ongoing living expenses
in the
future.
Who it's good for: An increasing term
policy might be worth considering if you don't have room
in your budget now for a
big policy but expect to earn more money
in the
future.
Spending more money on a full comprehensive
policy today can lead to
big savings
in the
future,
in contrast to being too frugal and being underinsured which definitely result to
bigger expenses
in due time.
If a
policy is not
big enough to meet financial challenges for your family
in the
future then relying solely on it is a bad idea.
«We stand for small
policy changes and maybe possibly
big ones
in the
future.