Sentences with phrase «bigger than the theory»

Not exact matches

Last year, an analyst at RBC Capital Markets concluded that a single episode of The Big Bang Theory was more valuable to advertisers than an entire week's worth of viewing on YouTube.

Or you could think of it as a version of the greater fool theory — you want to be sure there's at least one bigger sucker than you willing to buy your goodies when you finally get over your growing greed and decide that it's time to go.

Meanwhile on the TV side, the site TorrentFreak found that for the third year running, HBO's Game of Thrones is the most pirated program of 2014 with more than 8 million downloads from BitTorrent, followed by AMC's The Walking Dead (4.2 million), and CBS's The Big Bang Theory (3.6 million), the consistently most watched cable drama and network comedy.

Value per user If a bigger audience means greater opportunity for growth and monetization, then in theory, Facebook's (NASDAQ: FB) user base should be worth more than either Google's (NASDAQ: GOOGL) Google + or Twitter.

The whole theory of ID starts with a flawed idea that there is something bigger than us that can design us.

-LRB-... Still not sure how the Big Bang «THEORY» even became a theory, other than somebody desperately trying to find an alternative to creation, but it should NEVER be taught as a fact, but rather as a THTHEORY» even became a theory, other than somebody desperately trying to find an alternative to creation, but it should NEVER be taught as a fact, but rather as a THtheory, other than somebody desperately trying to find an alternative to creation, but it should NEVER be taught as a fact, but rather as a THEORYTHEORY).

But your knowledge of science is so much less than so many Catholic Priests such as Gregor Mendel (1822 - 1884) the father of modern genetics, Georges Lemaître (1894 - 1966) the person who proposed the Big Bang Theory and Stanley Jaki Born in Hungary, he earned doctorates in Systematic Theology and Nuclear Physics, is fluent in five languages, and has authored 30 books.

[5][6] The theory could potentially explain why a mysterious repulsive form of energy known as the «cosmological constant», and which is accelerating the expansion of the universe, is several orders of magnitude smaller than predicted by the standard Big Bang model.»

This full view of God lifts up a God who is more than a Creator who made the world out of nothing, more than the God of the big - bang theory who began the universe and then left it to run on its own -

The irony is that your vaunted big bang theory does much more to confirm God than to negate him.

The Big Bang Theory no more proves the existence of a god than it does the existence of beings with 25 heads and 43 legs.

It also confirms more than any other evidence that the universe had a beginning and expanded at a rate faster than the speed of light within less than a trillion of a trillion of a trillion of a second — less than 10 ^ -35 of a second — of the Big Bang by detecting the miniscule «light polarizations» called B - Modes caused by the Gravitational Waves — which were theorized in 1916 by Albert Einstein in his Theory of General Relativity but never detected before — of the Inflation of the Big Bang which are embedded in the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation — CMB or CMBR that was discovered by American scientists back in 1964.

The Big Bang Theory has many revisions, there are many top statistical experts that have calculated the odds of Creation from a supreme being being Millions of times more likely than everything magically falling into place.

If you accept the «big bang» theory, where did the stuff that created it come from if not from something greater than it?

I do not see anyone other than you even talk about big bang theory and now you accuse someone else of not knowing it from evolution.

Both are theories and so by taking a stance that «science», i.e. the Big Bang was more believable because of your theory which is no more provable than the theory of a God was hypocritical, something you claim people who believe in God are.

The Big Bang is no less a theory than religions are.

I.E. the big bang theory which would require belief in the fact that some kinds of Matter ALWAYS existed and that at some point it all exploded and created a universe, a belief i might add, that in my view takes more faith to believe in than most modern religions.

Even an explanation of the actual «big bang theory» (not just popular understanding), something truly existing out of nothing (rather than just not knowing yet where it came from), is absolutely awe inspiring.

There is no way to prove or disprove a higher being, and there is no way to prove or disprove the big bang theory (contrasting beliefs in most people's opinions), but what we do know is the Earth is way older than 6,000 - 10,000 years old, and that is FACT.

Far more proof has been presented scientifically about evolution and the big bang theory than by believing in a god.

Quantum Mechanics is WAY weirder and more complex than, say, evolution (though I like how you threw the big bang in there — separate theories, dude), but you won't really hear any religious nuts complaining about the exact same process that gives us QM because it doesn't conflict with their ancient mythology.

I understand evolution and the Big Bang theory (better than you, I warrant).

PDX — It doesn't take a Genius to realize from my statements that i have read things other than the Bible you moron i have spent many hours reading and listening to scientists about their theories on the big bang, i have listened to ideas from the most revered scientists including Hawking and others, and they all admit that there are holes in their theories, that nothing fully explains their big bang theory, the physics doesn't add up let alone the concept, there are plenty of scientists hard at work trying to make the numbers fit and the theory hold weight but if you ask any of them they can not give you the answers and the reason being... there are none, the theory doesn't work, If by the observable laws of Physics, Matter in this Universe can not be created or destroyed, you can only change its state, i.e. solid to liquid, to gas... to energy... There is no explanation for how an entire reality full of Matter can be created out of nothing... Scientists know this... idiots that are atheists and simply would rather NOT believe that their lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT to believe... but Your belief in God does not change whether or not he exists you will be judged.

So he's more of a back - up big man in theory than in practice.

On the other hand a Metro report has rubbished this theory and claimed that the problems of Arsenal are much bigger than missing just one player and that the Spaniard is not the sort to help the Gunners to win games, so which is closer to the truth?

Perhaps he wishes to rack up the world's biggest chit from the Senate Republicans, who would quite literally owe the continued existence of their majority to Cuomo; or maybe, as the slightly darker version of this theory goes, Cuomo wants his party to stay in the minority in the Senate, because actually he would prefer to deal with a disciplined, perpetually indebted Republican majority there than a dysfunctional, chaos - making Democratic one.

This is the Celebrity Big Brother Theory of women in the public eye, as advanced by my old friend Matt Goddard [@JokerMatt]: as in politics, when it comes to booting celebs off the sofa, women are more likely to vote than men and they tend to actively vote against the women contestants they dislike more readily than they do their male counterparts.

Yet conventional theories of black hole formation and growth suggest that a black hole big enough to power these quasars could not have formed in less than a billion years.

In particular, Roughgarden, an evolutionary biologist at Stanford University in California, takes issue with sexual selection, the portion of evolutionary theory that seeks to explain why male peacocks have big, showy tails, why eggs are bigger than sperm, and...

According to these theories, reproduction is a bigger gamble for males than for females.

The big advantage of quantum bits, and the point of developing them, is they contain more information than a classical bit — meaning quantum computers can use them, in theory, to solve super complicated equations much faster than a normal computer could.

Some nervy upstarts are questioning the validity of string theory, which is to physics what Wal - Mart is to retail: the biggest thing around, dominant for more than 20 years now.

One such was a theory by evolutionary biologist Robert Trivers, which claimed a bigger parental investment by females than males.

According to the big bang theory, one of the main contenders vying to explain how the universe came to be, all the matter in the cosmos — all of space itself — existed in a form smaller than a subatomic particle.

However the big - bang theory claims that all matter in the universe came from a primordial «egg» one hundred billion times smaller than a proton.7 With a radius of almost zero, that «egg's» angular momentum would be almost zero — even if its surface had been spinning at the maximum possible speed — the speed of light.

Advanced LIGO will also be used to search for the gravitational cosmic background, allowing tests of theories about the universe's development less than a nanosecond after the Big Bang.

That is great in theory, but the big problem with this is that in the specific day you're lifting, your daily max is different than the max you did or calculated weeks ago.

Expanding faster than the «big bang theory» is being eviscerated, I travel at a planetary pace but my dance is galactic and can not be grounded as easily as my soles appear to be.....

I have never picked up on that aspect of the After more than five years of dating, Sheldon (Jim Parsons, left) and Amy (Mayim Bialik, right) spend their first night together, on The Big Bang Theory.

The «Big Bang Theory» co-stars once again claim that they're nothing more than friendly ex's!

November 11, 2012 By Janet Bloomfield (aka JudgyBitch) 383 Comments The «Big Bang Theory» co-stars once again claim that they're nothing more than friendly ex's!

Young Sheldon is a smarter, more humorous and heartfelt show than «The Big Bang Theory.»

Its a hell of a lot better than 90 % of the terribly unrelatable shows you watch like The Big Bang Theory or NCIS.

Melissa Rauch (True Blood, The Office) is more toned down here than in her cutesy role as Bernadette in The Big Bang Theory, but still awfully adorable.

Sounds too potentially easy to make comic fans look worse than they do on Big Bang Theory.

Particularly in big cities, however, this often turns out to work better in theory than in reality.

But it's a fun book, to be sure, and would make great Halloween reading for those who are bigger fans of conspiracy theories, myths, legends and world history than of horror fiction.

The big deal with the Optimus 2X is that it has a dual core processor, a new Nvidia Tegra 2 chipset in fact, which promises improved graphics processing and, in theory, should make it notably faster and more capable than any of the single core processors we've seen on handsets so far.

Investments which do not produce income tend to rely on the Bigger Idiot Theory which states there must be a bigger idiot out there than you who is willing to buy the investment at a higher price than youBigger Idiot Theory which states there must be a bigger idiot out there than you who is willing to buy the investment at a higher price than youbigger idiot out there than you who is willing to buy the investment at a higher price than you paid.