And because I believe the pie is one hell of a lot
bigger than traditional publishers or agents think it is, I will support and encourage you or anyone else who wants to give it a go and not sneer at them because they weren't traditionally published.
Not exact matches
Independent authors and Amazon - imprint authors sell more eBooks per day
than the
traditional publishers combined which is the uncomfortable truth that most industry observers, and those in the
Big Five
publishers, find it hard to swallow.
More and more, the indie author market is giving
traditional publishers a run for their money and the
big New York houses are going to have to innovate even more
than they have in the past.
That is quite a few less
than a
traditional publisher, BUT (and this is a
big one) there are some MAJOR benefits Amazon works in compared to a
traditional publisher.
While reprint
publishers have been the
biggest contributors by introducing hundreds of thousands of recycled works to the market,
traditional publishers have also contributed as many, if not more, books
than indie authors.
A new report claims that self - published authors have surged to 31 % of ebook sales on Amazon.com, and are now earning more ebook royalties
than writers published by the «
Big five»
traditional publishers.
As I described in a recent post, Eisler said that what made the decision to go with Amazon easy was that the web giant promised to not only get his books to market faster — both in print and electronic form — but also offered to sell them at a lower price
than the
traditional publisher, and apparently (although the terms of his deal weren't released) gave him a
bigger share in the proceeds to boot.
But as an author who was badly treated by a
big traditional publisher (HarperCollins), I, so far think there's no one out there who treats authors more fairly
than Amazon does.
I want to sell more of my novels via my own publishing
than I would if a
traditional,
big time
publisher were putting the books out there.
It is also remarkable that while the share of the
traditional publishing houses (including the
Big 5) falls (probably partly due to the
publishers artificially keeping the prices high), the indie market grows: individual authors sell more ebooks daily on Amazon
than the
publishers with ISBN put together.
And the authors of those books actually earned more
than those whose books were released by
big - ship
traditional publishers.
Nor, do I suspect, they know a self -
publisher from a
traditional publisher (other
than the
big names).
With
traditional publishers sticking more
than ever to higher prices for their recent debuts, it seems that with few exceptions nearly all of the
Big Five's ebook sales are going to their longer tenured authors.
Howey makes a good case that the «average» author earns more from a self published book
than she would through one of the
Big Five
publishers, and, what's more, that this holds true for all sorts of outliers (the richest indie authors outperform the richest
Big Five authors; less - prolific indies do better
than less - prolific
traditionals, etc).