In one of the week's
biggest pieces of film news to filter down through the regular internet channels, The King's Speech «s Colin Firth joined The Kids Are All Right «s Mia Wasikowska and Rabbit Hole «s Nicole Kidman in the mysterious feature (with the ladies replacing the earlier cast of Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps «s Carey Mulligan and The Brave One «s Jodie Foster), which heralds from a script written by Prison Break star Wentworth Miller.
One of the particularly amazing parts of The Last of the Mohicans is how quietly director Mann lays out
big pieces of the film.
Not exact matches
My
biggest interests are music and
film I like to believe everyone can be touched by music or a great
piece of film.
Co-starring Survivor contestant turned thespian Colleen Haskell, Schneider's tale
of a car accident victim imbued with superhuman powers after being
pieced back together with animal organs kept the low - brow rolling while marking his territory among the ranks
of the more successful transitions from SNL player to
big screen star.Later, in the 2000s, Schneider frequently alternated between starring in his own
films (The Hot Chick, Duece Bigalow: European Gigolo), and supporting his old pal Sandler (The Longest Yard, I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry), with few on either side truly managing to ignite the box office or his career momentum.
All that mixed with the ingredients
of a blockbuster
film, a great cast, good humorous timing and spectacular set
pieces makes for a very entertaining ride that works as a standalone
film as well as part
of the
bigger picture.
Stone's misguided efforts to turn Alexander into a drama
of Shakespearean proportions undoubtedly plays a
big role in the
film's wildly uneven tone, which flits wildly between talky period
piece and flamboyant melodrama (often within the space
of a few scenes).
A slick, cynical, nasty
piece of heist -
film plotting that hides its more obvious logical gaps in techno - babble and distracting spectacles
of wanton violence and
big explosions.
Instead we are presented with an absolute turd
of a
film with shockingly bad «action» set
pieces (despite not actually requiring major action set
pieces for the plot), dreadful visuals that might as well be that «Gladiators» TV show complete with glitter and sparkles, a god awful thrash / heavy metal soundtrack just in case you forgot this
film was suppose to be tough and your obligatory dire
big name cast hot
of the heels
of other poor major blockbusters (yeah stick him / her in it,
big name, can't go wrong, doesn't matter if they actually fit the role or not pfft!).
It feels as if there are at least a couple
of scenes missing, including some
big set
pieces that might have opened up the
film's world beyond Planet Zero, the Fantastic Four, their dad (or at least Johnny and Sue's dad) and Doom.
That's harder said than done, resulting in a relationship that not only feels more real than most
of the
films this year, but plays a
big part in its success as a romantic dramedy and an enchanting
piece of science fiction.
Some
of these are only implicit; during the
film's
big softball - game set -
piece, I was staring dumbly at the screen, trying to figure out if the guys in tight, bulging shorts and / or cut - off, midriff - baring T - shirts were being subtly coded as gay, or if those outfits were simply part
of the tough - guy fashion repertoire
of the time.
Because despite how they may be advertised, these
films are generally about treading water for as long as possible until bringing out most
of the
big robot set
pieces in the last act.
Sure, every
film benefits, but it's not that much
of a stretch to say vast
pieces like Lawrence
of Arabia get more out
of a
big screen presentation than, say, a James Brooks movie, is it?
The bus sequence seen in the trailer is one
of the
big action
pieces in the
film but comes before the
biggest final action sequence.
In the end, it is by no means a truly awful
piece of work, but the
big problem is that it was originally conceived as a short
film, and has clearly suffered from the expansion
of the narrative that has led to it cropping up on the
big screen.
Some
of the other extras are more production - based, like the location featurette «James Bond in the Bahamas,» an in - depth featurette on
filming the sinking palazzo sequence («Death in Venice»), and storyboards for two
of the
film's
big set
pieces.
The
film is another
piece of horror - tinged, genre filmmaking — this time the main inspirations are hyper violent»80s action
films like
Big Trouble in Little China and The Terminator (again)-- but like the duo's preceding
film, it knows what it is, recognizes the flaws
of its ancestors, and tries to improve upon them while holding onto that sense
of reckless abandon that makes those movies so fun.
But in the scheme
of things he's just another player in a
big, messy, tangled ensemble
piece with a weird and wonderful cast in a free - for - all chase for the letter, the
film's Maguffin in every sense
of the term.
The
film doesn't reinvent the wheel, but it's a sturdy, tonally assured
piece of work with a winning specificity to its voice and setting, giving Murray a real gift
of a part in one
of his best performances, one that the audience have clearly responded to in a
big way.
But The
Big Lebowski isn't about plot, it's about the individual
pieces of the
film, The Dude's bathrobe, John Turturro's wonderful performance as Jesus Quintana, and the way the White Russians gleam on screen.
It's not a very logical turn
of events, but the glimpses
of male rear nudity and exaggerated belly flop sounds present one
of the
film's
biggest set
pieces.
«The Making
of The Goonies» (6:50) is not some
big recent retrospective, but a press kit
piece from the time
of filming.
Like all good sequels it took the ideas and set
pieces of the first
film and made them
bigger and properly raised the stakes.
«
Big» is such a classic
piece of film and it also was a real turning point for Tom Hanks as an actor.
That's harder said than done, resulting in a relationship that not only feels more real than most
of the
films last year, but plays a
big part in its success as a romantic dramedy and an enchanting
piece of science fiction.
No doubt one
of the
biggest draws
of the
film will be the action set
pieces that feature robot - vs - robot action.
With a hard - hitting opinion about the current state
of public education, and many opportunities for the two stars
of the
piece, Maggie Gyllenhaal and Viola Davis, to go
big acting-wise, this has all the hallmarks
of the sort
of prestige
film that is looking ahead to awards season.
Those expecting something similar to the first movie will be mostly let down, as this
film is very much a one - location thriller that relies more on character
piece than
big Statue
Of Liberty lobbing monsters.
Instead, working with veteran screenwriters Alex Kurtzman & Roberto Orci («Star Trek,» «Transformers») and Jeff Pinkner (TV's «Alias,» «Lost»), Webb gives us a
film that's densely plotted — sometimes confusingly so — with set
pieces so
big and glossy, they're depleted almost entirely
of any connecting sensation.
It would be great to see Snowpiercer became as
big an international hit as that earlier
film, which also blended cutting social commentary, blockbuster set
pieces and the sort
of thrills you rarely get out
of contemporary marketed - to - death multiplex fare.
In the largest
of innumerable ironies, the duo is incensed that their underground credibility is being ruined by the production
of a
big - budget picture and seek to, if not stop the production
of the
film - within - a-
film (to star James Van Der Beek and Jason Biggs), get a
piece of the financial pie.
While — like (I guess) many Rohmer fans — I tend to find myself most at home in his beach houses and Parisian apartment blocks, I was drawn to this presentation
of his lesser - known historical
films for two reasons: one was the pure joy
of being able to enjoy his greatest work, Perceval, on the
big screen; the other was the opportunity to finally be introduced to his feature - length television play Catherine de Heilbronn, a production that, in its grey set design and even starker minimalism, in many ways felt like the former
film's shadowy companion
piece.
One
of the
big pieces of news out
of this year's SXSW
film festival was the announcement
of a new aggregate movie review and ratings site, meant to answer many
of the issues people have with Rotten Tomatoes.
Pieces of April is a pretty sharp
film, one with a lot
of emotional truth, some
big time gravity, and a few much needed laughs.
Best - case scenario: You show up an hour late, missing the endless don't - these - ugly - Americans - suck portion
of the evening, and arrive just in time for the first
big kill — the
film's one and only memorable set
piece.
However, the
biggest winner and my own top favorite
film of the festival was Benh Zeitlin's Beasts
of the Southern Wild, a tremendous
piece of cinema (read my review) which is one
of the best discoveries
of this year's fest.
In this light, Marczak's
film turns out to have a completely coincidental yet nevertheless fitting companion
piece in theaters right now: Terrence Malick's Song to Song, which chronicles a similar phase in young - adulthood through a love triangle
of its own, albeit set in the gritty indie - music scene
of Austin, Texas, rather than in the
big - city glamour
of Warsaw, Poland.
He sets the stage for Mayhem by showing us how the oppressive world
of big business runs,
piece by
piece, and sets about dismantling it using tropes from scary movies, video games, kung fu
films and workplace sitcoms.
Wade's interview process is one
of the
big comedic set
pieces of the
film; it's where Rob Delaney's Peter first shows up.
«Anatomy
of a Plane Crash» (7:46) takes us behind the scenes
of the
film's
big action set
piece, touching on the influential research, the maneuvers depicted, and the effects used on a gimbal stage with green screen.
In addition to getting behind - the - scenes looks at set
pieces, we gather some
of the
film's
big driving principles, like amazing attention to detail and Fincher's propensity for many takes.
Unfortunately, however, the
biggest criticism leveled at the new Doctor Strange trailer is that some
of the set -
pieces shown off are reminiscent
of two
of the most culturally recognizable
films of the past decades, Christopher Nolan's Inception and Lana and Lily Wachowski's The Matrix.
It is with immense reluctance and about a million caveats that we give «Batman v. Superman: Dawn
of Justice» a spot on this list, but there's no denying it's an effective
piece of marketing for one
of the
bigger post - «Star Wars»
films of 2016.
Above and beyond, this is a
film of big ideas, elevated from what could be a theatrical chamber
piece by the rigorous manner in which it delves into the question
of artificial intelligence and the singularity, leaving you picking over its issues well after the credits roll, while also never feeling like you're sitting through a TED talk.
While I feel that they in no way should shoulder any blame whatsoever for that
piece of shit in Colorado doing what he did (he was looking to kill as many as he could, and it could have very well happened 4 months later in something like Breaking Dawn, the NEXT
big film that will have a shit ton
of people in it), do you think that what they're doing with «Gangster Squad» is an effort on their part to kind
of keep the connection between their two
films as loose as possible?
In its ambition it resembles Rose Troche's third
film, The Safety
of Objects — that picture also saddled with a large, veteran cast and a problem with focus, but most importantly with the responsibility
of a young filmmaker given the opportunity, with a
bigger budget and well - regarded performers, to produce a
piece commensurate in scale to that perceived expectation.
As Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle, Bad Boys II, and Legally Blonde 2 touch down in theatres, Die Another Day, The Jungle Book 2, and the Brady Bunch movies land on DVD, and then there are the cross-promotions: It seems like everyone wants a
piece of the fallout from Universal's
big - screen Hulk, with Fox, Buena Vista, Anchor Bay, and Universal itself issuing «Hulk» - branded discs prior to the feature
film's June 20th opening.
Though the cast delivers believably enough as one new
piece of information after another alters their plans, it's pretty clear where things are going from the first
big reveal and the
film can't manage to feel fresh from that point forward.
And based on the production artwork we saw and the designs for the
big action set
pieces, the man has plenty
of amazing ideas that we have never seen in any
of his previous
films.
«The Hun Charge» (4:50) dissects the technical demands
of one the
film's
biggest, most CG - intensive set
piece.