Sentences with phrase «biggest shareholder needs»

New talent scouts new physio team new backroom staff some new blood on the directors board and most of all our second biggest shareholder needs to be on the board.

Not exact matches

The growing opposition from major shareholders could be a big problem for Dell because in order for the company to go private, he needs the approval of the majority of shareholders, excluding his stake in the company.

Which will now be harder, because paying for Solar City in stock — and hence diluting existing shareholders substantially — mere weeks after a big equity offering will make investors to whom Musk will have to sell stock in the future to meet his voracious needs for money think twice: will he take their money then dilute them again a few weeks or months later?

Although I don't want Arsenal to become a big spender like Chelski or Man Shitty, We need a manager who buys the right players and plays them in there respective positions, thats the reason for buying them / Usmanov has the money (more than Abramovich) and should be allowed to either buy the club or sit on the board, it is a disgrace that a man who is Arsenal's 2nd biggest shareholder is disregarded as having any say on Arsenal matters.

One big reason for the lower expense ratio is that ETFs do not need to constantly buy and sell securities to accommodate shareholder purchases and redemptions.

I am always a little wary of «story stock» management; they need to be good promoters for the initial capital raise, but then they begin to drink their own kool - aid and don't tend to be very shareholder friendly even when they, themselves, are big shareholders.

Time for a step - change... Overall, it's a pretty stable core business, so management needs to start milking it for cash to return to shareholders (via dividends / buy - backs), or else accelerate growth by ramping up its leverage & acquisition pipeline / spending (more acquisitions, bigger acquisitions, or both...)-- at this point, I'd still prefer a bet on the latter.

ETF for India, China, Vietnam, etc.)-- Vanguard is good; I am in process of replacing the TD eFunds with Vanguard ETFs (I should have done it much earlier but they were under in my RRSP, it should have not mattered, the corresponding ETFs were low too)-- Big companies are good (McDonalds, Starbucks, Pfizer, WM) until they are not so perhaps I should get rid of them and buy more Vanguard ETFs — Buying distressed companies could be a winning proposition but have I very mixed results so better not (BP and Transocean bought after the oil spill, Nortel, BlackBerry, and Nokia — BP and NOKIA good, Transocean under not much, but under, BB very, very bad, and Nortel no comments)-- Berkshire is very good as it is a kind of ETF but what would happen after Warren Buffett (who would have thought AIG would need to be bailed out and the shareholders wiped out in the process or other cases where individuals brought companies down for example Barings the oldest bank in England)

He might try to change things for the better, but more than pleasing customers, he has to please shareholders and sponsors — and to please those, they need big profits.