Not exact matches
(Sometimes, when I look at all the
birth interventions and the
hospital routines that interfere and the misinformation and the formula advertising, I think it's a miracle that any mother is actually able to breastfeed!!
People generally choose to
birth at home because it feels more comfortable and they wish to avoid
routine hospital interventions such as continuous electronic fetal monitoring or IV fluids.
In addition, they are typically healthy and wish to avoid
routine hospital interventions or non-evidenced based practices such as being confined to a bed, not being allowed to eat or drink in labor, continuous electronic fetal monitoring,
routine IV fluids, non-medically indicated (pitocin) induction, episiotomy and other common
birth interventions.
Health facilities which have
routine separations of mothers and babies after
birth are years behind the times, and the reasons for the separation often have to do with letting parents know who is in control (the
hospital) and who is not (the parents).
Health facilities that have
routine separations of mothers and babies after
birth are years behind the times, and the reasons for the separation often have to do with letting parents know who is in control (the
hospital) and who is not (the parents).
Different practices have different procedures, and it's important to feel comfortable with how your personal preferences align with the
hospital or
birth center's long - standing
routines and norms.
These benefits include but are not limited to the power of the human touch and presence, of being surrounded by supportive people of a family's own choosing, security in birthing in a familiar and comfortable environment of home, feeling less inhibited in expressing unique responses to labor (such as making sounds, moving freely, adopting positions of comfort, being intimate with her partner, nursing a toddler, eating and drinking as needed and desired, expressing or practicing individual cultural, value and faith based rituals that enhance coping)-- all of which can lead to easier labors and
births, not having to make a decision about when to go to the
hospital during labor (going too early can slow progress and increase use of the cascade of risky interventions, while going too late can be intensely uncomfortable or even lead to a risky unplanned
birth en route), being able to choose how and when to include children (who are making their own adjustments and are less challenged by a lengthy absence of their parents and excessive interruptions of family
routines), enabling uninterrupted family boding and breastfeeding, huge cost savings for insurance companies and those without insurance, and increasing the likelihood of having a deeply empowering and profoundly positive, life changing pregnancy and
birth experience.
Although unforeseen events and emergencies can occur in any
birth setting, some of which can be best handled in a high risk
hospital, a low risk healthy woman entering the typical U.S.
hospital expecting a normal vaginal
birth is subjected to a
routine barrage of procedures and interventions that dramatically increase the risk of complications and problems, with potentially longstanding physical and emotional ramifications for both mother and baby.
There are lots of options in childbirth today, and
routine practices vary widely depending upon what kind of health care provider you choose and whether you decide to deliver your baby in a
hospital, a
birth center, or at home.
During these visits she may help with
birth planning - will the baby be born at home or in a
hospital or
birth clinic - as well as doing the
routine examinations.
Ina May Gaskin's C - section statistics over 40 years: 1.7 % American
hospital C - section statistics: 32 % not including
routine episiotomy and so on... Oh yes, I know who I would trust for my child's
birth... And if the price of an intact body and a peaceful
birth was «gentle stimulation» I would accept it with no hesitation... Of course I live in France where obstetric violence is the norm and home
birth nearly considered as criminal by the establishment, but where puritanism is long gone (thank God)... You may remove this post as you did for my previous one... It's OK we've got lots of you this side of the Atlantic telling us what's good or bad for us and we trust them less and less.
Artificially rupturing membranes is
routine at
hospital birth.
1987 «
Hospital Birth Routines as Rituals: Society's Messages to American Women,» Journal of Pre - and Peri-Natal Psychology 1 (4): 276 - 296.
As mother's opted to use physicians to give
birth in
hospitals or clinics, rather than using a midwife for home
birth, the practice of
routine circumcision of male infants blossomed and became nearly universal.
In special circumstances,
hospitals may be unable or unwilling to offer gentle or personalized choices, such a preference to avoid
routine monitoring and drugs; accommodating the needs of older or younger mothers who want a natural
birth (and tend to be subject to higher intervention rates); families seeking a natural
birth after cesarean.
However, healthy women giving
birth in US
hospitals are likely to experience such interventions as induction,
routine electronic fetal monitoring, restricted movement and other procedures that are linked to cesarean surgery.
However, you might want to have a written
birth plan to give them regarding care for your newborn after it's born, especially if the closest
hospital to you has a lot of
routine practices that can hinder breastfeeding.
My main concern was to be able and get out of the
hospital asap after
birth to continue with our
routine as undisturbed so that our 1st born does nt feel much the effect of a new baby.
Yet I could give you a list, too, of complications and injuries, and yes even death, that would not have occurred without the
routine interference, over-medicalization, and refusal to support normal physiological
birth that is the norm in
hospitals.
Ask providers how long a parent can expect to stay in the
hospital or
birth center after they deliver, and how many visits their patients usually have as part of
routine postpartum care (usually only one or two are part of
routine care covered by insurance).
The objective of the study was to examine the association between placental abruption, maternal characteristics, and
routine first - and second - trimester aneuploidy screening analytes.The study consisted of an analysis of 1017 women with and 136,898 women without placental abruption who had first - and second - trimester prenatal screening results, linked
birth certificate, and
hospital discharge records for a live - born singleton.
Chapter eight explores natural
birth options, including what to expect when you go into labor, how to avoid
routine medical interventions, home verses
hospital and if choosing
hospital, how to make the experience more green and natural.
In many ways, I understand how
hospital birth has become so
routine, so limiting.
Objective 1: Identify 3 key
hospital routines that enable breastfeeding within the first hour after
birth.
Intervention 2: postnatal lactation support: in addition to
routine care, women received 2 postnatal sessions with a LC, 1 in
hospital within the first 3 postnatal days (when they received the same printed guides on breastfeeding as the antenatal education group) and 1 during the first
routine postnatal visit 1 to 2 weeks after the
birth.
We breathed another sigh of relief, having been expecting to have to watch the
hospital staff like hawks lest they follow through on their
routine protocols before reading or remembering our
birth plan.
The intervention was a single home visit on day 3 after the
birth (in
hospital), by 2 lay breastfeeding supporters, that lasted about 30 min and covered the same topics as
routine support.
Hospital environments and
routines are not conducive to the shift in consciousness that giving
birth naturally requires.
75 years of
routine hospital birth have produced NO studies to show it is safer than having a baby at home with a skilled
birth attendant.