Sentences with phrase «bit more money for»

That does nt» even mention the fact that to really make the standard Moto Z a great phone (and to take advantage of its unique abilities), you need to pitch a bit more money for some mods.

With the power and capabilities the Moto G5 Plus offers, it's worth shelling out a bit more money for.

If, like me, you're looking for a bit more heat in your hatch, consider the Volkswagen Golf and Mazda3, which should be priced competitively against the Corolla Hatchback, or save a bit more money for the Volkswagen GTI, Roadshow's favorite hot hatch.

Not exact matches

But the US is also responsible for approximately one - third of the carbon dioxide that has been emitted, which makes the fact that the country is pledging a larger sum of money a bit more logical.

It's good for making a little bit of money, but is also potentially something more long term as well.

We are going to strongly suggest that for a little bit more money you can get a seat assignment.

«There are teachers with creative ideas on how to engage students, but they just need a little bit of money for more hands - on experiences,» Pine says.

For any individual who signs up, there will be a bit of luck involved; the size of a pool will depend on the number of folks who sign up — and if more folks have trouble conceiving in a particular pool, there will be less money available to split among them at the end of the period.

I am usually willing to trade (a little bit of) money for (a little bit) more time.

Done - For - You Sustainability Marketing from Your Own CSR Work: Now that you've spent time and money not only becoming a greener and more socially responsible company but writing it up in your CSR Report, you can have us identify and highlight that research and those accomplishments — and make it easy to use the best bits to make your marketing more effective.

While the monthly payout is nice for individuals needing income today, I'd rather have more growth so I sold all my shares this month at a little bit of a loss and reinvested that money in my Loyal3 account.

I have been debating where to start throwing my money, and i have started up a bit with lending club, and vanguard index funds, but most of the hype and youtube videos i see, are people praising divide stocks, and how you can «reinvest that free money back into the stock for more free money!»

Either way though, they are still trading time for money, and if they'd like to earn more money, they'll most likely have to stick around work just a little bit longer.

Its pitch was simple: If you have a bit more than walking - around money, instead of buying ETFs, you can just buy single stocks, and take advantage of your single - stock losses more efficiently, lowering your tax bill in exchange for some small amount of tracking error.

I have been buying Mamma Chia for the past few weeks now, and then the other day I stumbled across your article, whilst trying to figure out a way to bulk order the drinks to save some money, and after a bit of research into some other recipes to make it taste more like Mamma Chia (3 tbl spoon chia seeds + 1 cup of water + 1 of your favorite juice) and a short trip to Whole foods, I'm now enjoying my own Chia juices from home at a much better price!

«Consumers have a bit more money in their pockets, but are still pressed for time.

His form was patchy at best and when The Ox was moved back there for a few games he showed up far better than Bellerin had been doing.He seems to have been a bit more consistent lately but if we are offered the type of fee being touted by Juve and Madrid etc then grab the money quickly - he ain't that good.

I'd be curious to know how much money the team brought in last night ($ 0 in tickets / parking but presumably quite a bit more than usual in concessions and merch) vs how much they bring in charging for tickets / parking but only getting 8K on a normal Tuesday night.

For all the talk about Chelsea's depth you only have to look at their bench to see he didn't have too many potential game - changers, he had Remy but after that not too much eg: Cuadrado, Mikel, Loftus - Cheek, Ramires — bit of a mixed bag and for my money AS offered more than any of them as an impact player with a great engine to boFor all the talk about Chelsea's depth you only have to look at their bench to see he didn't have too many potential game - changers, he had Remy but after that not too much eg: Cuadrado, Mikel, Loftus - Cheek, Ramires — bit of a mixed bag and for my money AS offered more than any of them as an impact player with a great engine to bofor my money AS offered more than any of them as an impact player with a great engine to boot.

High hopes for Reiss Nelson who looks the part at 8 and far more developped than Ox... But let's face it will all the cash we spend to watch Arsenal, dress the part and all the money they bring in with Tv deals, commercial deals that keep growing & kit deal we don't want to hear that there is no money... We sent out on either on loan or sold: Gabriel, Szczesny, Emilio, Ox, Perez, Campbell, Gibbs, Chris Willock and now it looks a bit thin if you ask me to play Europa, the domestic cups & the EPL... with Sanchez & Mesut gone for free... as a business we didn't do anything savvy.

just reading around and all if not most rags are saying our net spend is # 46 million how can they tell that when they do nt even know what our real budget is if it was # 100 million then we are in profit by quite a bit i do nt really know what they base there assumptions on this is where you could do with swiss ramble to dissect what really was spent from what i could see most of our 5 transfers were covered by out goings and c / l monies earned debuchy - vela deal, chambers - vermalen deal, ospina - cesc and miquel deals sanchez c / l monies and other monies recovered from wages and old installment based deals this is the same with welbeck i would imagine if not then poldolski will be sold in jan to cover this as i think he was going to be sold and this would have covered welbecks transfer more or less also and people do nt always realize that arsenal have money coming in from more than one source to cover transfers not just puma and emirates deals we have property arm of the club which makes money for transfers also outstanding debts we are owed of old transfers we receive each year on song cesc maybe van persie and all other structured deals in installment payments sales we just flogged miquel as an example and all the monies from released wages and youths sold its a bit to complex to just say we have a net spend of xyz when arsenal do nt even make the budget public so they have no starting point from which to go from i bet you we have broke even or even made a slight profit as we are self sustaining it would make sense that we can break even or at least make the net spend under # 10 million each year at least screw then all we are the arsenal we do thing our way

Basically, they're for clubs that are not in the Champions League, if you're outside the Champions League and you have a plan for how you want to develop, you are allowed to invest a bit more money, but you have to get yourself back into the confines within three years, so it's not quite what's being reported.»

Emirates stadium and huge sponsor deals we finally have had two poor years by his standards at the helm we always havent been so great and are we weak supporters or strong give him a contract i mean hes won with ants for money let him spend for once cause even if we do get new manager inflation has occured and no body else will win with the small amounts we gave him to spend and in 20 years actuall more it seems the club is finally willing to spend give him a contract let him spend and if we do nt improve which i think we will i think that the club is finally willing to spend shows were on an upturn because as long as top four the owner and board weren't and after we spend big or somewhat big for once and auba and mkhitaryan arent the big im hoping for i want more if liverpoodlians can pay 75million for a cb let wenget spend a bit and if we still do bad we can always sack him or ask him to leave wouldnt be uncommon but we owe it to him and do nt say we do not because emirates london colney that will bring in high talent here for years to come and we have never spent for him just gave little and hes always done big things with little i think he can do bigger things in his final years if we give him big i do nt see us in decline but if we sack him we will be for a good three maybe four years

It is certain that inflation from the TV money (and added oil money) has made the market for the best players very difficult, and from his words it sounds like Wenger is simply not willing to pay the increased figures and will not be buying anyone else in this window despite our current nett spend only coming in at about 25m so far, and we will probably recoup a bit more of that once we get rid of some deadwood.

Lemar is a bit of a sticky wicket... we don't get him without letting Sanchez move on and how disturbing it would be if we end up paying more for Lemar than we get for Alexis on the open market, especially since many of predicted big spenders have already made some big money moves and / or showed their hands... don't get me wrong, the tape on Lemar is full of hope but Sanchez he is not.

The selling clubs will still think they can get a bit more and hold out for more money.

All seems a bit unlikely to me, unless RM are buying him back, knowing they can sell for more money.

This is a decent article, yet the negatives from fans are still there, I would love to see arsenal like I did at the end of the 90's and at the beggining of the 2nd millennium but it doesn't mean in order to do so I would buy all the best players in world, I would get a rich owner to put his filthy money in, change the manager every 2 years to do so, there's so much wrong in football nowadays that yes it's still a sport but there's more focus on the filthy amounts of money being spent on clubs and players that I think attracts more attention than the game itself, now that is wrong and it's very wrong, even our owner though not like the arabs or Russians, yet the yank is clueless about the tradition of our game, it's just sad, so the fact that Wenger has remained for this long through all these changes that have occurred whilst the money game has elvolved, it makes me happy that arsenal do not spend stupid amounts of money on players, we don't try and buy the league, hell we even tight with wages and transfer fees, I'm glad it's like that, though our season ticket is a rip off I still don't mind it because at least we are not like the other supreme teams, there's a bit of tradition left at our club, yet you go to man shitty or Chelski, there is no tradition, it's all about buying ur way all the way to the top, on the other hand spuds don't know what to make of them besides how the heck have they finished above us?

Liverpool manager Brendan Rodgers will have a little bit more money to add to his transfer kitty for the January transfer window, with the Reds this evening having confirmed the sale of Moroccan international winger Oussama Assaidi to Al - Ahli on a permanent deal — although no fee is discussed by the piece.

So what a football club should do is in a year where it has made good money it should declare that a certain proportion of its surplus will be returned to the season ticket holders in proportion to the price they have paid for their tickets, those paying more getting a little bit more.

People who criticize him for not doing all those other things are a bit like people who say, for amount of money Ferrari cost, it should have more room in the back, bigger booth and softer ride.

We need the walking wounded back and no more to replace them in the Diaby suite, although that's a bit unfair as you you could put Jack's name on the door as well.We need this win not so much for the money but the prestige of reaching the last 8 and the co-efficient points.

So you know, if you're investing a little bit more money you know for this item for the birthday party.

Lastly, while purchasing anything for the baby, go for the ultimate best option even if you need to spend a bit more money!

While you may pay a bit more in the beginning for an unlocked smartphone, over time they save you money.

Hopefully we'll help raise lots of money for charity, and raise folksy profile a bit more too — all winners!

These are useful for parents who are ready to spend a bit more now in order to save money later.

You gain more bang for your buck with this set of bottles and saving a little bit of money is a huge benefit when you are purchasing products for your baby.

For parents who have the budget to spend a bit more money, the Shermag Glider Rocker Combo is an excellent choice for durabiliFor parents who have the budget to spend a bit more money, the Shermag Glider Rocker Combo is an excellent choice for durabilifor durability.

Save your money for something a little bit more fun!

You will pay a little bit more for better wipes, but as you use fewer wipes and your baby to be unlikely to have rashes, well that will save you money (and stress!)

If you do need a rechargeable battery take a look at the Spectra S1 for a bit more money.

Parks Department planners have been working on designs for a new and improved Luther Gulick Park — now they've got a bit more money to get the job done.

For those of you who have a bit more money to spend and a need for several different pieces of cookware, we wanted to make sure to include the Chef's Star Professional in our revieFor those of you who have a bit more money to spend and a need for several different pieces of cookware, we wanted to make sure to include the Chef's Star Professional in our reviefor several different pieces of cookware, we wanted to make sure to include the Chef's Star Professional in our reviews.

Crisp thinks that Goldin will have to «tune up» the budgets for the cheapest missions, giving them a bit more money so that scientists don't have to make fatal compromises to get them aloft.

Then you can make a choice as to whether you want to pay a little bit more for a better dishwasher because you're going to get that money back in your utility bills.

As someone who's always been a bit frugal and was raised by several generations of the most frugal of people, it was hard for me to make the decision to actively spend more money.

I love trendy fast fashion pieces, but unlike many who like these items for their great price point, I find I can easily spend more money on these pieces rather than if I spend a little bit more on one piece but more infrequently.

For $ 50, I'd expect it to be a bit more versatile and work easily within any skin regimen, but I'm glad you were able to at least find a way to use it and get your money's worth!

Over the last 2 1/2 years at Grandma's House DIY (since I started the blog) I have been fully introduced to what I have come to think of as the «Blogger Hustle» which, if it were a dictionary term, would be described as, «A blogger trying every conceivable thing that they can possibly think of times a million and a half and then some more in an attempt to figure out what works for their blog to increase their traffic and then, by some kind of miracle, also maybe make a little bit of money.»