Sentences with phrase «bit more money in»

But I can see why others aren't happy about all of this, as it does technically mean Square Enix can make a bit more money in the long run.

You will make a bit more money in the short term, but in the medium term Amazon will tell you they will be paying you 70 % of $ 9.99.

«These products cost a bit more money in the short term, but the investment is worth the tremendous long term benefits to your health and happiness and your wallet,» says Hyman.

Perhaps you could say the industry is turning a corner, but this is not unexpected considering that there is a bit more money in the system.»

«Consumers have a bit more money in their pockets, but are still pressed for time.

But having a little bit more money in the bank is not the same as running a great airline and having a great group of people, and having people come up every moment of every day saying you've created the best airline in the world.

Not exact matches

When you say it that bluntly, it cheapens the underlying truth, so let me attempt to be a bit more genteel: We work so that we might tend to the many other things we care about in life (the vast majority of which cost money).

There's a bit more moving money around, focusing on innovation, which is clearly in the interest of business, but our view here is that innovation must be lead by business not by government.

For any individual who signs up, there will be a bit of luck involved; the size of a pool will depend on the number of folks who sign up — and if more folks have trouble conceiving in a particular pool, there will be less money available to split among them at the end of the period.

In recent years, money has flooded into low - cost index funds and out of more expensive actively managed funds, thanks in part to a greater focus on the large bite fees take out of already lackluster retirement balances over the long terIn recent years, money has flooded into low - cost index funds and out of more expensive actively managed funds, thanks in part to a greater focus on the large bite fees take out of already lackluster retirement balances over the long terin part to a greater focus on the large bite fees take out of already lackluster retirement balances over the long term.

Done - For - You Sustainability Marketing from Your Own CSR Work: Now that you've spent time and money not only becoming a greener and more socially responsible company but writing it up in your CSR Report, you can have us identify and highlight that research and those accomplishments — and make it easy to use the best bits to make your marketing more effective.

While the monthly payout is nice for individuals needing income today, I'd rather have more growth so I sold all my shares this month at a little bit of a loss and reinvested that money in my Loyal3 account.

If I find myself flush in retirement assets in a few years, I might dial that back a bit (in full consideration of taxes) and put more money toward our home or current assets.

Its pitch was simple: If you have a bit more than walking - around money, instead of buying ETFs, you can just buy single stocks, and take advantage of your single - stock losses more efficiently, lowering your tax bill in exchange for some small amount of tracking error.

«Australia tends to bear the brunt of costs more than anyone else, mostly because emerging countries in Asia take a bit of investment and it seems Australia has to pay their share when money is required.»

injuries [parlour said our training techniques were the same as from 2004] not having a world - class CF (cavani, suarez, rvp,...), very thin defence & some teenagers in it, no CDM until recently, i want to like wenger, but i think what he does is always a bit short, why not spend a bit more to buy defenders (i don't buy his argument that they are hard to get; the solution is almost always money), favoritism to some players (wilshere..)

I'd be curious to know how much money the team brought in last night ($ 0 in tickets / parking but presumably quite a bit more than usual in concessions and merch) vs how much they bring in charging for tickets / parking but only getting 8K on a normal Tuesday night.

However much we Arsenal fans might have wanted the manager to spend a bit more money or how much we thought the squad needed a boost in certain areas, we can only hope that Arsene knows best.

High hopes for Reiss Nelson who looks the part at 8 and far more developped than Ox... But let's face it will all the cash we spend to watch Arsenal, dress the part and all the money they bring in with Tv deals, commercial deals that keep growing & kit deal we don't want to hear that there is no money... We sent out on either on loan or sold: Gabriel, Szczesny, Emilio, Ox, Perez, Campbell, Gibbs, Chris Willock and now it looks a bit thin if you ask me to play Europa, the domestic cups & the EPL... with Sanchez & Mesut gone for free... as a business we didn't do anything savvy.

A) the new players aren't good enough to be better than the sum of their parts and MP isn't able to overcome lack of talent on scheme alone, tanking the season; or B) The Lions are victims of their own success, where the cheap bit players that MP has schemed in find more money elsewhere due to improved stats, and we're stuck playing roulette on cheap, short - term guys again.

I guess Arsene Wenger can say that he has been saying all summer that the problem is not money but finding the players, although I think the Frenchman could have been a bit more proactive in his attempts.

«In terms of our plans to use that money if it was to come in the door, that time is ticking away and that concerns me a little bit more.&raquIn terms of our plans to use that money if it was to come in the door, that time is ticking away and that concerns me a little bit more.&raquin the door, that time is ticking away and that concerns me a little bit more.»

just reading around and all if not most rags are saying our net spend is # 46 million how can they tell that when they do nt even know what our real budget is if it was # 100 million then we are in profit by quite a bit i do nt really know what they base there assumptions on this is where you could do with swiss ramble to dissect what really was spent from what i could see most of our 5 transfers were covered by out goings and c / l monies earned debuchy - vela deal, chambers - vermalen deal, ospina - cesc and miquel deals sanchez c / l monies and other monies recovered from wages and old installment based deals this is the same with welbeck i would imagine if not then poldolski will be sold in jan to cover this as i think he was going to be sold and this would have covered welbecks transfer more or less also and people do nt always realize that arsenal have money coming in from more than one source to cover transfers not just puma and emirates deals we have property arm of the club which makes money for transfers also outstanding debts we are owed of old transfers we receive each year on song cesc maybe van persie and all other structured deals in installment payments sales we just flogged miquel as an example and all the monies from released wages and youths sold its a bit to complex to just say we have a net spend of xyz when arsenal do nt even make the budget public so they have no starting point from which to go from i bet you we have broke even or even made a slight profit as we are self sustaining it would make sense that we can break even or at least make the net spend under # 10 million each year at least screw then all we are the arsenal we do thing our way

Basically, they're for clubs that are not in the Champions League, if you're outside the Champions League and you have a plan for how you want to develop, you are allowed to invest a bit more money, but you have to get yourself back into the confines within three years, so it's not quite what's being reported.»

It is why I have said from the start that we do not need to buy a CB and money is needed in other areas more, Chambers and Holding are not big international names but we seen Holding play like a # 55 million CB, better if I may say but I am a bit biased XD and Chambers has had Boro fans say they will follow his career and really sad to see him leave.

like I said before it doesn't matter who is the manager it starts from the top of the board has to go if we have a strong Like I said before it doesn't matter who is the manager it starts from the top board has to go if we have a strong Board Who is pushing the manager then we'll have a chance Wenger is a good manager but if we have a board he's not interested in winning things you know the answer to that do you remember when Dean was in charge Wenger was around then we won everything The board is destroying Wenger and Arsenal football club American doesn't give a toss about AFC if we put pressure on the board then they might start spending a bit of money or Selecor hopefully I'm glad we lost today because I think it will go to the board maybe get the stupid American to spend a bit more money

Emirates stadium and huge sponsor deals we finally have had two poor years by his standards at the helm we always havent been so great and are we weak supporters or strong give him a contract i mean hes won with ants for money let him spend for once cause even if we do get new manager inflation has occured and no body else will win with the small amounts we gave him to spend and in 20 years actuall more it seems the club is finally willing to spend give him a contract let him spend and if we do nt improve which i think we will i think that the club is finally willing to spend shows were on an upturn because as long as top four the owner and board weren't and after we spend big or somewhat big for once and auba and mkhitaryan arent the big im hoping for i want more if liverpoodlians can pay 75million for a cb let wenget spend a bit and if we still do bad we can always sack him or ask him to leave wouldnt be uncommon but we owe it to him and do nt say we do not because emirates london colney that will bring in high talent here for years to come and we have never spent for him just gave little and hes always done big things with little i think he can do bigger things in his final years if we give him big i do nt see us in decline but if we sack him we will be for a good three maybe four years

Any club regardless of the owner would notice that amount of money so they might be a little bit more cautious when it comes to bringing in more players as they've spent so much on so little already.

It is certain that inflation from the TV money (and added oil money) has made the market for the best players very difficult, and from his words it sounds like Wenger is simply not willing to pay the increased figures and will not be buying anyone else in this window despite our current nett spend only coming in at about 25m so far, and we will probably recoup a bit more of that once we get rid of some deadwood.

In simple words a club can spend a lot of money (more than they earn) to get résulte un thé pitch and more profits off thé pitch (that's what they call the neoclassic theory) in what wenger do nt believe, sadly, his way of thinking economy is a little bit outdatIn simple words a club can spend a lot of money (more than they earn) to get résulte un thé pitch and more profits off thé pitch (that's what they call the neoclassic theory) in what wenger do nt believe, sadly, his way of thinking economy is a little bit outdatin what wenger do nt believe, sadly, his way of thinking economy is a little bit outdated

But 3 - 4 years since have gone by where Wenger has had quite a bit of money to spend in which I believe he could have done a lot more with.

This is a decent article, yet the negatives from fans are still there, I would love to see arsenal like I did at the end of the 90's and at the beggining of the 2nd millennium but it doesn't mean in order to do so I would buy all the best players in world, I would get a rich owner to put his filthy money in, change the manager every 2 years to do so, there's so much wrong in football nowadays that yes it's still a sport but there's more focus on the filthy amounts of money being spent on clubs and players that I think attracts more attention than the game itself, now that is wrong and it's very wrong, even our owner though not like the arabs or Russians, yet the yank is clueless about the tradition of our game, it's just sad, so the fact that Wenger has remained for this long through all these changes that have occurred whilst the money game has elvolved, it makes me happy that arsenal do not spend stupid amounts of money on players, we don't try and buy the league, hell we even tight with wages and transfer fees, I'm glad it's like that, though our season ticket is a rip off I still don't mind it because at least we are not like the other supreme teams, there's a bit of tradition left at our club, yet you go to man shitty or Chelski, there is no tradition, it's all about buying ur way all the way to the top, on the other hand spuds don't know what to make of them besides how the heck have they finished above us?

So what a football club should do is in a year where it has made good money it should declare that a certain proportion of its surplus will be returned to the season ticket holders in proportion to the price they have paid for their tickets, those paying more getting a little bit more.

People who criticize him for not doing all those other things are a bit like people who say, for amount of money Ferrari cost, it should have more room in the back, bigger booth and softer ride.

«We shall have some money to spend but it will have to be more than a bit at this level now because the prices of players are astronomically high, particularly players in this country.

We need the walking wounded back and no more to replace them in the Diaby suite, although that's a bit unfair as you you could put Jack's name on the door as well.We need this win not so much for the money but the prestige of reaching the last 8 and the co-efficient points.

While you may pay a bit more in the beginning for an unlocked smartphone, over time they save you money.

These are useful for parents who are ready to spend a bit more now in order to save money later.

We should be a bit more open in relation to the way in which money can flow from social investment to outcomes and social impact bonds.

«The second reason is that costs in the NHS inexorably go up as new drugs come on stream, new treatments arrive, as the population gets older and I don't think there is an option of just quietly standing still staying where we are and putting a bit more money into the NHS.

I think it is a bit of a myth to believe that somehow there are some people in Europe who are going to spend a lot more money and those of us who realise we have to deal with our debt and our deficit.»

For those of you who have a bit more money to spend and a need for several different pieces of cookware, we wanted to make sure to include the Chef's Star Professional in our reviews.

Then you can make a choice as to whether you want to pay a little bit more for a better dishwasher because you're going to get that money back in your utility bills.

I would go out and spend money on a whim in the hope that it would give me a buzz, make me feel a bit more alive inside.

I don't want to waste my money on scams and fake products, which is why I took the time and effort to make this website so you would have a little bit more help in making your purchasing decision.

Over the last 2 1/2 years at Grandma's House DIY (since I started the blog) I have been fully introduced to what I have come to think of as the «Blogger Hustle» which, if it were a dictionary term, would be described as, «A blogger trying every conceivable thing that they can possibly think of times a million and a half and then some more in an attempt to figure out what works for their blog to increase their traffic and then, by some kind of miracle, also maybe make a little bit of money.»

This is definitely a part of your wardrobe that you need to spend a bit more money on in order to get the quality and longevity you want from it.

This time I was way too excited to pick up some stuff that I had been eyeing since quiet a long time.I went a bit crazy at Mac, Bobbi Brown and Lancome, I had to pick up some more items from Sephora but I had to stop myself because I had spent a lot.I spent a lot of my husband's hard earned money in a matter of just half an hour but what to do, when it comes to makeup I can't stop myself.Sephora will be next on my shopping list.

Russian women are dependent, shy, reserved and don't want to work; NONSENSE, RUSSIAN WOMEN ARE VERY «HARD» WORKERS (MORE THEN MEN I WOULD SAY), BUT YES, THEY ARE DEPENDENT, BUT NOT FOR THE MONEY OR WHATEVER, THEY ARE DEPENDENT OF THE LOVE FROM THEIR PARTNER, LIKE I AM DEPENDENT OF HER LOVE, AND ABOUT «SHY», WELL, IRINA IS A LITTLE BIT SHY, BUT ONLY WHEN I CA N'T STOP LOOKING INTO HER EYES, FOR THE REST, IRINA IS A WOMAN WHO KNOWS WHAT TO DO IN THIS / HER LIFE, SHE IS VERY INITIATIVE AND KNOWS WHAT TO DO IF SHE WANTS TO REACH SOMETHING IN HER LIFE.

eHarmony clearly takes the money they make from charging a bit more and invests it back in their product.