There's
a bit of a human nature piece in this.
This bit of human nature cuts across all lines.
Not exact matches
The biopharma world went into a
bit of a frenzy on Tuesday as
Nature reported that a team
of Chinese scientists had become the first in the world to launch
human trials
of the groundbreaking CRISPR gene - editing technology.
The fourth step goes a
bit further, to see «the trajectory eventuating in the creation
of human historical existence» not «as a metaphysical surd but rather as grounded in the ultimate
nature of things, in the ultimate mystery.»
Jennifer Moorcroft, a lay Carmelite, brings a deep understanding
of the Carmelite tradition, combined with sensitivity and insight into
human nature to introduce the reader to the «
bit players».
Vast numbers
of people think that the fact
of a relatively settled order
of nature, along with the scientific interpretation
of change and the description
of the inner dynamics
of human personality (and much else as well), has ruled out once and for all genuine novelty and made change nothing more than the reshuffling
of bits of matter - in - motion.
A brilliant school
of interpretation
of Greek mythology would have it that in their origin the Greek gods were only half - metaphoric personifications
of those great spheres
of abstract law and order into which the natural world falls apart — the sky — sphere, the ocean - sphere, the earth - sphere, and the like; just as even now we may speak
of the smile
of the morning, the kiss
of the breeze, or the
bite of the cold, without really meaning that these phenomena
of nature actually wear a
human face.
Along with dualistic mythology several developments in scientific thought since the seventeenth century have contributed to the exorcism
of mind from
nature: first, there is the cosmography
of classical (Newtonian) physics picturing our world as composed
of inanimate, unconscious
bits of «matter» needing only the brute laws
of inertia to explain their action; second, the Darwinian theory
of evolution with its emphasis on chance, waste and the apparent «impersonality»
of natural selection; third, the laws
of thermodynamics (and particularly the second law) with the allied cosmological interpretation that our universe is running out
of energy available to sustain life, evolution and
human consciousness; fourth, the geological and astronomical disclosure
of enormous tracts
of apparently lifeless space and matter in the universe; fifth, the recent suggestions that life may be reducible to an inanimate chemical basis; and, finally, perhaps most shocking
of all, the suspicion that mind may be explained exhaustively in terms
of mindless brain chemistry.
Learn a
bit more about history and the
nature of human kind — you might see some amazing similarities.
Although quite a
bit of evidence was produced concerning the difference
of human behaviour from animals, the
nature of spirit, and the ensoulment
of man (both in terms
of the ensoulment
of each individual
human person, and also the initial ensoulment
of the first fully
human man) were unsatisfactorily addressed.
And if you want to take
human nature out
of the game, then you need to take every
bit of contact out
of the game and play it to the letter
of the law.
Maybe it is our curious
nature as
humans or maybe we — as sports bettors — have a
bit of a masochistic streak.
The problem with getting rid
of the monogamous
bit is that it's
human nature to want a faithful partner.
Ernst Fehr is completely right that economic theory should incorporate a
bit of realism about
human nature (1 May, p...
The journey is fraught with nail -
biting interactions, playing with concepts
of identity, individuality, existence, mutations, the
nature of cell division and duplication (and duality), and what it means to be
human.
The real enigma isn't the glimmering, matter - warping
nature of Area X, despite how intoxicating it looks on screen — it's the darkest part
of the
human heart, that desire to break ourselves open, even if it's just a little
bit, in rebellion against our animal instincts toward self - preservation.
While Anon doesn't boast a superior story, it's engaging in the way many B - grade noir films from the «40s and «50s were — pulpy excursions into the dark side
of human nature with hard -
bitten heroes and duplicitous femmes fatale.
Pellington is working from an uncharacteristically sentimental screenplay from Alex Ross Perry, known for his
biting, incisive and often merciless portrayals
of human nature in the independent films he's written and directed himself, including «The Color Wheel» and «Queen
of Earth.»
There's also a certain amount
of trepidation at what this kind
of power will feel like on the road in a mid-engined car on regular street tyres, but
human nature being what it is, it's not too long before your right foot pushes a
bit harder for a
bit longer until those turbos wake up with a banshee wail.
I'm an observer
of human nature, storing
bits and pieces
of information that may be used in the process
of writing a novel.
It suggests that it is
human nature for homeowners to believe the last
bit of «expert» advice they receive, even if it is contrary to previous advice.
Predictable and consistent behavior Prefers
human company, especially children Relatively «directable» without training Affectionate Able to be banged around, by kids and clumsy
humans Comfortable indoors and outdoors Doesn't require a lot
of exercise Calm in the home; not hyperactive High drives and excellent mental focus Athletic, excellent conformation, and excellent endurance Able to take, and learn from, a correction High initiative Low fearfulness Submissive to Dominant: depends upon the
nature of the work Low other - dog aggression is preferred, but not always a requirement Quiet: unless barking is needed for the work If used for protection, will follow through and
bite with intention, if not used for protection, then little to no aggression in most circumstances Easily Housetrained
Partially because
of these early breeding efforts which frowned on «man
biters,» pit bulls gained a reputation for their trustworthy
nature with
humans.
But then the writers make a few more terrible jokes, including one scene where Bryce checks out Arcadia's lingerie in her apartment, that start to drag poor Bryce back into the realms
of being unlikable, and that leaves me at a
bit of an impasse: I could argue that Bryce is perhaps an interesting study on
human nature, questioning what someone would actually become after 500 - years
of watching friends and family die around them without being able to die themselves, always having to live on the outer fringes
of society.
«
Bits of Elsewhere» is Manalo's third exhibition with Addison Ripley, and the new work follows her ongoing pursuit
of capturing memory and the tenuous, ethereal uncertainty
of human nature.
Gary Indiana wrote
of her work in Utopia's Debris (2008): «This is the subtext: The conviction that empathy can, in fact, change the world — a little at a time, and not always, and you will only improve things a little
bit, anyway, but if you don't even try, the incurably ugly side
of human nature has already won the war inside us all.»
* There is too much conflicting evidence about climate change to know whether it is actually happening * Current climate change is part
of a pattern that has been going on for millions
of years * Climate change is just a natural fluctuation in Earth's temperatures * Even if we do experience some consequences from climate change, we will be able to cope with them * The effects
of climate change are likely to be catastrophic * The evidence for climate change is unreliable * There are a lot
of very different theories about climate change
and little agreement about which is right * Scientists have in the past changed their results to make climate change appear worse than it is * Scientists have hidden research that shows climate change is not serious * Climate change is a scam * Social / behavioural scepticism measures * Climate change is so complicated, that there is very little politicians can do about it * There is no point in me doing anything about climate change because no - one else is * The actions of a single person doesn't make any difference in tackling climate change * People are too selfish to do anything about climate change * Not much will be done about climate change, because it is not in human nature to respond to problems that won't happen for many years * It is already too late to do anything about climate change * The media is often too alarmist about climate change * Environmentalists do their best to emphasise the worst possible effects of climate change * Climate change has now become a bit of an outdated issue * Whether it is important or not, on a day - to - day basis I am bored of hearing about climate change
although Shakespeare could not have predicted the rise
of urban entertainment centers in the late 20th century, he did know a
bit about
human nature and entertainment.