You haven't even read his explanation for writing it the way he did as your diabribe against him showed, so I've no reason to think anything you've said in this «Refutation
of Stable Thermal Equilibrium Lapse Rates» is in the least
bit relevant as a refutation, and so, you may think you're finished, but I think you should begin again, Take II, and stick to his thought experiment and not your
strawman silver wire deflection.