Sentences with phrase «bit of money if»
It's not as seamless as having a legit Google Home, but it's a process that works and can save a bit of money if you want a Google Home - like experience without actually spending any cash for one.
https://www.androidcentral.com/
You can level up by simply participating in any of the epic battles, but be prepared to spend a bit of money if you want the very best gear the game has to offer.
«The lender stands to lose quite a bit of money if someone takes out a loan and then sells the property.»
That means I may earn a little bit of money if you buy through one of my links.
My breast pump review would have to state to all - using two pumps (or one that goes for both sides, but they are bulky and expensive) is heaps quicker and worth the extra little bit of money if you are going to be working and pumping for a while.
There is a version with an ottoman, which I would recommend personally, but you can save a little bit of money if you go without one.
Not exact matches
Sure — it might mean spending a little bit of extra money to consult a lawyer but, if Delta's legal department has taught us anything, it's that it is always better to solve a problem before it morphs into a lawsuit.
Even though you want to put your stamp on things, it's something of an unenviable task when you factor in the sheer amount of time and money spent, especially if you're a bit clueless about design.
For any individual who signs up, there will be a bit of luck involved; the size of a pool will depend on the number of folks who sign up — and if more folks have trouble conceiving in a particular pool, there will be less money available to split among them at the end of the period.
We'll have a longer gambling guide to the rest of bowl season tomorrow, but if you are feeling antsy this Boxing Day and looking to put a bit of money down, there's plenty of college football action to get you through the day.
Again, putting money into the market involves taking on a certain amount of risk so this isn't a strategy you should jump into if you're not comfortable with the possibility of losing some of your money or waiting a bit longer to see a return.
There's quite a bit of research, based on historical returns, that finds if you retire at age 65, you can withdraw 4 % a year (plus inflation adjustments) from your nest egg with only a small risk of outliving your money.
But, hey — if my shows stop stalling right in the middle of the exciting bits, I'll consider it money well spent.
The CEO talked about the Internet riches harnessing that technology could bring Tribune by pointing to the example of Buzzfeed, though that comparison misses many of the almost innumerable differences between a legacy newspaper company — even if one with the time and money to really «transform» itself — and a venture - juiced, digital - only, social news success, which is itself experiencing a bit of a stumble.
If I find myself flush in retirement assets in a few years, I might dial that back a bit (in full consideration of taxes) and put more money toward our home or current assets.
It's nice to save a little bit on the monthly payments but putting all this money upfront could strain your budget, especially if it costs most of your savings.
Your first Minnesota pay stub could come with a bit of a shock if you're used to earning money in a state with no income tax.
The reason the system goes along with it is if your option is to pay a little bit of money in NIRP and I end up losing that money, but the bond bubble stays intact and the system continues to function.
Its pitch was simple: If you have a bit more than walking - around money, instead of buying ETFs, you can just buy single stocks, and take advantage of your single - stock losses more efficiently, lowering your tax bill in exchange for some small amount of tracking error.
Or if I found out that I lost my last bit of money, or if I were told that people are waiting for me at the place where I work and I am still at home, still in bed, etc.?
Presumably if a person saves a bit of money by reducing energy costs, he or she will either spend the money on something else or put it in the bank.
As long as this voter kept working, she would have a modicum of security — and if she shopped a bit for her routine care, she might even save some money.
We try as hard as we can to give as much aid as we can, and I'm sure other churches do too, but if everyone put forth even more effort, religion would once again become a key part of society and the government would have a little bit more money to work with.
But if you have a smaller library, or if you are just starting out in building your theological library, than investing a bit of money is required and even necessary, and this is where Logos Bible Software comes in.
These are sooo good I used medjool dates the first time I made these but then I switched to normal dates as they are much cheaper and I have to say I could NOT tell any difference whatsoever so I'd recommend people to give regular dates a go if they wan na save a bit of money.
Valentine's day is a nice excuse for a bit of fun, even if it with not spending any money.
So I promise promise PROMISE that, even if I have to use my little bit of spending money on this myself... this girl is getting to work on some breads in the kitchen ASAP!
It would be great in my opinion if the Swedish international striker Zlatan Ibrahimovic was one of the summer additions to the Arsenal squad so I was a bit worried yesterday when there were reports in the football media about Man United having made him an offer, because we know how much money they are prepared to throw around.
His form was patchy at best and when The Ox was moved back there for a few games he showed up far better than Bellerin had been doing.He seems to have been a bit more consistent lately but if we are offered the type of fee being touted by Juve and Madrid etc then grab the money quickly - he ain't that good.
And while neither make a lot of money (comparatively to professional hockey players, not you and me) if one of them goes, that's a little bit more Cap Room we clear out.
Enough to play for a little bit of money for charity and a trophy if the National Baseball Congress is any indication:
Every year its the same B.S. «Arsenal are only 1 or 2 players away from winning the league» and we don't buy them when we have the money, half of these players who we want to support don't want to play for the shirt after Wenger signed his extension, even if we forget about the leeches in the board and get behind our manager he's clueless and hasn't changed one bit.
Even for someone like myself who has been arguing wenger should have been kicked in to retirement 5 years ago the shambolic behaviour during this transfer is a bit of a shock... If the man has money to burn on upgrading his first eleven then Rodriguez and drexler for around 100m would do it... Draxler on the left with Sanchez and Rodriguez as free to roam attackers would cause big problems for any defence..
I wonder if the wage some of the younger players get is actually having a negative effect on their development as well, given too much money to quick and ending up a bit like a spoilt brat who smokes in the shower room or gets in the media when out clubbing...
I do have my doubts about this rumour, like all of them, especially when you see the money being talked about as nearly # 50 million, but Manolas is one of the top rated defenders in the world and if the price was a little bit less which it could well be as the contract situation with his current club is said to be the reason for the move, then maybe it could happen.
«In terms of our plans to use that money if it was to come in the door, that time is ticking away and that concerns me a little bit more.»
Personally I am on the fence with this one, no idea if what you are saying is true but it's been entertaining and you certainly have given some of the old guard on this site a bit of a run for their money.
If the Frenchman was being asked about the struggles of Jose Mourinho or Sir Alex Ferguson or any of his big rivals, I think he would have been tempted to add a bit of fuel to the fire of media criticism, perhaps pointing to the massive amount of money spent by the Dutchman in the summer.
If that's just a little bit too much of a project for you, then for double the money you can get another BT60Y, this time one that actually has (largely) the correct livery.
If not and if one player to be brought and spend a big bit of money (70 - 90m) on then we should have a look at Neymar... he was considering Man United was he noIf not and if one player to be brought and spend a big bit of money (70 - 90m) on then we should have a look at Neymar... he was considering Man United was he noif one player to be brought and spend a big bit of money (70 - 90m) on then we should have a look at Neymar... he was considering Man United was he not?
just reading around and all if not most rags are saying our net spend is # 46 million how can they tell that when they do nt even know what our real budget is if it was # 100 million then we are in profit by quite a bit i do nt really know what they base there assumptions on this is where you could do with swiss ramble to dissect what really was spent from what i could see most of our 5 transfers were covered by out goings and c / l monies earned debuchy - vela deal, chambers - vermalen deal, ospina - cesc and miquel deals sanchez c / l monies and other monies recovered from wages and old installment based deals this is the same with welbeck i would imagine if not then poldolski will be sold in jan to cover this as i think he was going to be sold and this would have covered welbecks transfer more or less also and people do nt always realize that arsenal have money coming in from more than one source to cover transfers not just puma and emirates deals we have property arm of the club which makes money for transfers also outstanding debts we are owed of old transfers we receive each year on song cesc maybe van persie and all other structured deals in installment payments sales we just flogged miquel as an example and all the monies from released wages and youths sold its a bit to complex to just say we have a net spend of xyz when arsenal do nt even make the budget public so they have no starting point from which to go from i bet you we have broke even or even made a slight profit as we are self sustaining it would make sense that we can break even or at least make the net spend under # 10 million each year at least screw then all we are the arsenal we do thing our way
# 60M for Aubameyang seems a bit high... this could have easily been paid for if the board had sanctioned the Sanchez to city summer transfer so now I don't know where we will get that kind of money from.
Normally, with the amount of money available to them, getting a player from the French champions would only be possible for Arsenal if they were keen on selling, but it seems as though the FFP rules and sanctions from UEFA may be starting to bite on PSG a little bit, which may be why the manager Laurent Bland has revealed, in a Metro report, that there is little he can do to stop the club selling Rabiot.
I myself think he's a bit of a stop gap, but I don't believe Wenger would pay that sort of money if he had no plans whatsoever for this player.
like I said before it doesn't matter who is the manager it starts from the top of the board has to go if we have a strong Like I said before it doesn't matter who is the manager it starts from the top board has to go if we have a strong Board Who is pushing the manager then we'll have a chance Wenger is a good manager but if we have a board he's not interested in winning things you know the answer to that do you remember when Dean was in charge Wenger was around then we won everything The board is destroying Wenger and Arsenal football club American doesn't give a toss about AFC if we put pressure on the board then they might start spending a bit of money or Selecor hopefully I'm glad we lost today because I think it will go to the board maybe get the stupid American to spend a bit more money
Lemar is a bit of a sticky wicket... we don't get him without letting Sanchez move on and how disturbing it would be if we end up paying more for Lemar than we get for Alexis on the open market, especially since many of predicted big spenders have already made some big money moves and / or showed their hands... don't get me wrong, the tape on Lemar is full of hope but Sanchez he is not.
Still, if Enrique is keen to earn as much as he was at Barcelona, he'd be on even more money than Jose Mourinho and Pep Guardiola, which seems a bit of a stretch.
Have we all forgotten Torries and Shevenko they couldn't score Abramavich pissed off Mourinio over it a waist of money, so all you guys think if you spend over 10 million your get the player, but if he don't wan na come to Arsenal get anyone you have no idea on how to run a soccer club Wenger is a first class manager he doesn't get swayed by the bitchey bits and he gets it right in the end Mark my words we will finish second if we beat City as we are gonna hurt a lot of you Wingers CB
Tottenham boss Harry Redknapp has a reputation for being a bit of a wheeler dealer in the transfer market, a man never shy when it comes to spending someone else's money, but for once the vastly - experienced manager may opt against recruiting winter reinforcements, instead opting to follow the age old adage of» If it isn't broke, don't fix it».
AVB has spent a bit of money in the summer but I don't think he's improved the side and if you lose Bale it could put an end to all of the good work that has been done at Spurs over the last 4 seasons!