Sentences with phrase «bit than scientists»

We are rated higher in both by a bit than scientists.

Not exact matches

As much as recent efforts to encourage women in STEM education and STEM jobs have helped move the needle a bit, the culture of science has often made life for women scientists harder than it already is — excluding them from clubby publishing and peer review networks and sometimes outright snubbing their achievements.

Putting that idea into practice, however, has proven a bit more complicated than some scientists initially envisioned.

About 59 years later, Darwin published his theory and other than a bit of a rough start, scientists (other than those half dozen) have not looked back.

If I had to pick one Doctor, I'd say he's almost more like the Ninth Doctor perhaps than any other but with a bit of that Third Doctor disinterested scientist thing going on.

Isn't a bit just as zealous as a creationist that tells you creationism is fact, to force an absolutely unproven theory, with zero physical evidence as scientific fact, rather than a wild theory that many scientist desperately hold onto?

The fact that this is not the least bit of a curiosity to you and that you rush to judgement by slandering him shows that you are thinking more like a sheep than a scientists.

Using the guidelines above (I am a scientist, I need rules to follow) I altered my previous recipe a bit, and I must say this product is much better than my first go at it a few months ago.

Trouble is, today's Iraq's Wikileaks seems to have the potential to arouse even more passions, and indeed result in greater adverse consequences than some scientists being outed as childish and maybe a bit sloppy.

As a major within the social scientists, we typically spend a bit less time completing our degree than basic science disciplines, but the information I say equally applies.

To find bits of embedded dust far smaller than the thickness of a hair, scientists would need a collecting material that was transparent.

Because he has lived a lifetime of complicated calculations, though, Penrose has quite a bit more perspective than the average starting scientist.

New research by scientists from the University of Bristol has revealed that domestic LED lights are much less attractive to nuisance insects such as biting midges than traditional filament lamps.

«In fact, it is OK and expected for the best scientists to be more than a bit obsessive about their work, and this is reflected in the hours they keep.

At the very least, young scientists should «keep an open mind with the literature, reading a bit more widely than they thought they might,» Fowler advises.

A lot of public - key encryption uses keys of 1024 bits, which are usually considered long enough to be secure, but computer scientists have already begun to break them, albeit with force rather than logic.

But for some unknown reason, scientists have said, there was a tiny bit more matter than antimatter left over after the Big Bang, so after the initial annihilation, the leftover matter became all the things we see in the universe now.

Stars orbited by planets are a little bit different than other stars, and scientists can use that to quickly home in on new planets.

When scientists used computers to simulate how biting would strain S. melilutra's jaws, they concluded that the animal had much firmer jaw bones than expected.

Since scientists first decoded a draft of the human genome more than 15 years ago, many questions have lingered, two of which have been addressed in a major new study co-led by a Princeton University computer scientist: Is it possible, despite the complexity of billions of bits of genetic information and their variations between people, to develop a mechanistic model for how healthy bodies function?

If scientists could spot this hydrogen evaporating from a planet that is a bit more temperate and little less massive than GJ 436b, that is a good sign of an ocean on the surface.

But he added that space weather scientists are paying closer attention to this event than might otherwise be warranted because two back - to - back CME events, both directed at Earth, is a bit more unusual, and because it's possible that the two could interact on their way to Earth.

Now, however, Feng Rao, a materials scientist at the Chinese Academy of Sciences's Shanghai Institute of Microsystem and Information Technology, and colleagues have found a way to write all PCRAM bits quickly, making it faster than most alternatives, including NAND flash — one of the other kinds of memory that's able to store information absent a power supply.

This dichromatic scheme created by production designer Damian LaFranche and cinematographer Tom Richmond is fascinating and more than a little unsettling: the white - clad scientists and orderlies blend in with background, with only their heads clearly visible, and the somewhat grotesque makeup of multicolored, poorly stitched together Lazarus (created by effects whiz Tom Savini, who also has a bit part) just stands out even more against the plain backdrop.

Gonzo casting like Tyler Perry as the scientist that eventually becomes a bug man may point to this film being a bit more interesting than its precursor, and hey, Megan Fox is always fun to watch.

Years after I visited scientists determined the limestone seats minimize low - frequency background noise while magnifying higher - frequency voices, which means actors could deliver full performances without modern microphones, so the effect is a bit less magical than when I was there.

Research stations allow you to unlock a little bit more stuff by assigning some scientists to pottle around, but they are all upgrades of existing items rather than being new rooms or cool new.

-- 475 ppmv CO2 is also something to be concerned about, only a bit less concerned about than the 350 ppmv that has been suggested by some scientists.

I'm concerned that little bits of info (e.g., more ice here, less ice there, sick animals here, winter storms there, and etc.) can be much more confusing than illuminating in the absence of a general understanding of the basic dynamics of global warming as (the majority of) scientists see them.

* There is too much conflicting evidence about climate change to know whether it is actually happening * Current climate change is part of a pattern that has been going on for millions of years * Climate change is just a natural fluctuation in Earth's temperatures * Even if we do experience some consequences from climate change, we will be able to cope with them * The effects of climate change are likely to be catastrophic * The evidence for climate change is unreliable * There are a lot of very different theories about climate change and little agreement about which is right * Scientists have in the past changed their results to make climate change appear worse than it is * Scientists have hidden research that shows climate change is not serious * Climate change is a scam * Social / behavioural scepticism measures * Climate change is so complicated, that there is very little politicians can do about it * There is no point in me doing anything about climate change because no - one else is * The actions of a single person doesn't make any difference in tackling climate change * People are too selfish to do anything about climate change * Not much will be done about climate change, because it is not in human nature to respond to problems that won't happen for many years * It is already too late to do anything about climate change * The media is often too alarmist about climate change * Environmentalists do their best to emphasise the worst possible effects of climate change * Climate change has now become a bit of an outdated issue * Whether it is important or not, on a day - to - day basis I am bored of hearing about climate change

But if this is just a bit of juvenile baiting, then sure, if the next ten years are warmer than average, I'm willing to agree that you can't infer anything from it and anyone who claims you can it not a scientist.

The use of the term «collapse,» which connotes an imminent calamity, rather than a long, relatively slow process (glaciers melting at, literally, a glacial pace) generated quite a bit of chatter in the climate journalism community, but in interviews, scientists defended the word as apt for this situation.

It's a bit cheap, given that there's no evidence or even likelihood, that actual climate scientists are responsible for this hoax, to say that jumping to very firm conclusions on very little evidence, and indeed fraudulently improving the evidence that doesn't quite show what you want it to, are characteristic of one side of this debate rather than the other.

Thankfully the thousands of dedicated scientists who are working on this around the world have a bit more vision than you.

«What we are seeing is that East Antarctica — already among the driest regions on Earth — is a bit drier than we thought,» said Ted Scambos, senior research scientist at the US National Snow and Ice Data Centre, and one of the co-authors.

Better to look at the actual reports done by the scientists than sound - bites gleaned by reporters.

Looking at the graph in the linked article the graph shows that the image of lawyers is competent but cold whereas scientists are a bit more competent and a lot warmer and Engineers are even more competent and a bit warmer yet — more competent than the warmer doctors — just, not as warm as professors and teachers.

I don't know, I'm not part of that conspiracy, and I see a lot of assertions on here and elsewhere by people who imply they are smart, or at least smart enough to know more on this issue than the climate scientists who actually professionally study it, who throw around large highfalutin science terms, but that repeatedly misconstrue the basic climate change issue itself, conflate the process of science with Climate Change refutation, seem to have an extensively poor understanding of the issue, and take small select bits of data as part of the ongoing total picture of increasing overall corroboration, to falsely equate that with a flaw in Climate Change theory itself, or as a referendum on it.

It includes his bit about fake letter - writers, his inconsistencies about whether he prompted a male or female Attorney General to question skeptic scientists attending a 1995 government hearing, the plausibility problem of that AG tipping him — a private citizen at that time — about the impending appearance of skeptic climate scientists there — plus more than a dozen other major problems.

No sooner had scientists shown that the Antarctic really had been warming up a bit, actually, probably due to climate change and everything, than it was proved that Emperor penguins are more screwed even than the polar bears:

Those scientists are distinguishable by their view on the science as being different than, arguably, the views held by most climate scientists (Tol is a bit trickier as perhaps the prevalence of opinion among economists is a bit less obvious).

«Readers and commentators must learn to share some practices with scientists — following up on sources, taking scientific knowledge seriously rather than cherry - picking misleading bits of information, and applying critical thinking to the weighing of evidence.

Scientists believe that the sun is a bit less than halfway through its life, which should last for another 6.5 billion years.

Thanks Ian (# 24), but it was much more specific than either the Heidelberg Appeal or the World Scientists» Warning To Humanity (suggesting that it was a bit later than» 92).

More than simply requesting the same data the way any other scientist would do they wanted every last bit of paper that a thought might have been jotted down on, every impromtu snippet of conversation ever uttered even every thought if they could have gotten it.

Embarking on a bit of a charm offensive, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change just released the names of more than 800 scientists selected to take part in writing its fifth assessment report on climate change, due out in 2014.

A good example was the recent «faster - than - light neutrinos»: It would have been silly to abandon well - established principles of physics just because some team of scientists (and a quite large and competent team of scientists) measured neutrinos going a tiny (but highly - statistically - significant) bit faster than the speed of light.