Sentences with phrase «bit wrong ends»

Not exact matches

Also, I may be wrong in thinking this, but I think you have accidentally written «avocados», instead of «asparagus» in the line «Remove the woody bits from the end of the avocados and roughly chop the stalks on the diagonal.»

My natural disposition is to see what is wrong in my life and want to fix it... want to make everything perfect, and in doing so often end up a bit disheartened at the realities that come to be.

I join you on that almostawinner... but the same can be said of that famous english core that we extended / signed a couple of years back... Ramsey is a great player, can be world class but for that has to stop being so wasteful at times (bad / heavy first touch, killing counter attacks with the wrong choices, not shooting well anymore the way it looks, giving the ball away)... your not on Gerrard level at his best Gibbs is a good player but seems happy with his bit part role, doesn't look like he's crazy about pushing & challenging Montreal for a XI spot Ox, I still believe in his talent but just no end product for an offensive player with his ability; he could be our version of PFA Hazard / Costa... is it a lack of confidence?

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Alonso was reprimanded for ignoring blue flags but Massa got away without any penalty because he didn't really do anything wrong, and it was only a quirk of Suzuka that meant he ended up delaying Verstappen by quite a bit.

Lemar is a bit of a sticky wicket... we don't get him without letting Sanchez move on and how disturbing it would be if we end up paying more for Lemar than we get for Alexis on the open market, especially since many of predicted big spenders have already made some big money moves and / or showed their hands... don't get me wrong, the tape on Lemar is full of hope but Sanchez he is not.

This is a decent article, yet the negatives from fans are still there, I would love to see arsenal like I did at the end of the 90's and at the beggining of the 2nd millennium but it doesn't mean in order to do so I would buy all the best players in world, I would get a rich owner to put his filthy money in, change the manager every 2 years to do so, there's so much wrong in football nowadays that yes it's still a sport but there's more focus on the filthy amounts of money being spent on clubs and players that I think attracts more attention than the game itself, now that is wrong and it's very wrong, even our owner though not like the arabs or Russians, yet the yank is clueless about the tradition of our game, it's just sad, so the fact that Wenger has remained for this long through all these changes that have occurred whilst the money game has elvolved, it makes me happy that arsenal do not spend stupid amounts of money on players, we don't try and buy the league, hell we even tight with wages and transfer fees, I'm glad it's like that, though our season ticket is a rip off I still don't mind it because at least we are not like the other supreme teams, there's a bit of tradition left at our club, yet you go to man shitty or Chelski, there is no tradition, it's all about buying ur way all the way to the top, on the other hand spuds don't know what to make of them besides how the heck have they finished above us?

There are a lot of things that can go wrong with screen printing, so sometimes the print doesn't come out and you just have to start again, which is a bit frustrating, but it's always worth it in the end.

Pick wrong and you'll end up looking like a bit of a dork.

Sounds like you probably ended up having more fun at the BBQ and I see nothing wrong with being a bit over dressed!

The week ended with a «a film noir gatecrashed by reality», as Peter Beech chose to describe In Bruges, Martin McDonagh's biting comedy about two hit men hiding out in the Belgian city after a job that's gone horribly wrong.

In this bite - sized dose of Uncharted 3 gameplay from Sony's E3 2011 press conference, Nathan Drake finds himself on the wrong end of a sinking ship.

Given the film's pedigree, it seemed wrong that I was able to call the preposterous ending a mile away, but there it was — every bit as absurd as the last film Ashley Judd and Morgan Freeman or Bruce Beresford made together.

Jimmy Kimmel, however, had even more to prove after the 2017 Oscars, which ended in a Best Picture mishap that had nothing to do with him but still occasionally felt like a comedy bit gone horribly wrong.

He once had cyborg - enhanced wings but got them hacked off Maleficent - style when he bit the wrong rear end.

I must say when I moved to Columbus I had a 2003 Chevy Malibu paying like $ 400 - $ 500 a month and then my car messed up and I was in need of a car super... bad so my cousin told me about miracle motor marts on Morse rd and took me to Kenne Smalls I told him what was going on how much money I had down and want I needed and he told me don't worry about imma take good care of you and few hrs later he ended up getting me approve for a 2011 Chevy impala paying $ 286 a month and he told me everything that was wrong with the car while was nothing but breaks and oil change and he made sure he took care of that before I drove off with the car.I had the car for a few months then I ended up getting into an var accident and car got Totaled out And once again I need a car I had a rental for alil bit then I hit Kenne Small up again and told him what happen he said the same thing the first time imma take care of you and he came through for me once again and this time with a better and newer car he got me in a 2014 Nissan sentra with no down payment and payments $ 360 but still cheaper then my 03 but one thing I really liked about Kenne after I got my cars he still called and checked on me seeing how I was doing seeing how the car was doing to and most dealerships don't do that and all the people there is just so nice I love it I'll Recommend Anybody to go to Kenne smalls for a car

bad so my cousin told me about miracle motor marts on Morse rd and took me to Kenne Smalls I told him what was going on how much money I had down and want I needed and he told me don't worry about imma take good care of you and few hrs later he ended up getting me approve for a 2011 Chevy impala paying $ 286 a month and he told me everything that was wrong with the car while was nothing but breaks and oil change and he made sure he took care of that before I drove off with the car.I had the car for a few months then I ended up getting into an var accident and car got Totaled out And once again I need a car I had a rental for alil bit then I hit Kenne Small up again and told him what happen he said the same thing the first time imma take care of you and he came through for me once again and this time with a better and newer car he got me in a 2014 Nissan sentra with no down payment and payments $ 360 but still cheaper then my 03 but one thing I really liked about Kenne after I got my cars he still called and checked on me seeing how I was doing seeing how the car was doing to and most dealerships don't do that and all the people there is just so nice I love it I'll Recommend Anybody to go to Kenne smalls for a car

On the outside, the sleek elegant design continues with an incredibly attractive posterior, strong character lines highlighting the profile, and a front end that's gone a bit wrong.

We also check if the start / end of paragraphs has a quote pointing the wrong way, but this gets a bit more advanced and can't be done with Word.

As for the end of traditional publishers being dead wrong, don't you feel it's a bit early to be sanguine?

Some ways are a bit easier on the author than others, but as long as the process ends in a good place, none are wrong.

And so you end up estimating and guessing, and a lot of times they're wrong, and it turns out the IRS and in California, Franchise Tax Board, and in other states, they know quite a bit about you before you file the return in terms of your income for the year.

While these seemingly different story paths tend to converge towards the end, their delivery can leave players feeling a bit confused and cause them to focus on the wrong things.

It was a game riddled with twists, turns and «wrong ends» that culminated in haunting, brutal death scenes, and its conclusion left many questions unanswered and more than a few loose threads untied (while at least one other was tied perhaps a bit too tightly)...

My «friend» Mickey Mann was a bit naïve and ended getting it very wrong.

We couldn't figure out what was wrong with her and she ended up having extensive diagnostics - CAT scan, bone biopsies - but most likely what happened with this puppy is that she hit her head at daycare, just playing around, and ended up having a bone infection in her skull from just a little bit of roughhousing trauma at daycare.»

If your dog bites a visitor or neighbor you can be on the hook for hospital bills or find yourself on the wrong end of a lawsuit.

The other concerns are also as he mentioned, getting a home mortgage depends on much more than just a great credit score, you also need good ratios on your front end (ALL housing expenses incl taxes, ins, etc) and back end ratios (ALL debt expenses, housing, credit cards, car, etc) so a good income is required, as well as a down payment of some sort (some programs go as low as 3.5 %, others still want 20 %) Assets can also figure in to this as well, but that's getting away from the bit I know about current lending standards and I don't want to start going off the wrong path here!