Sentences with phrase «bite humans as»

Does it cat flea bite humans as well?

Yes, cat fleas will bite humans as well.

Fleas are small biting insects that takes a blood meal from dogs and when starved they will bite humans as well.

Not exact matches

If a zombie bites a human, the person dies and returns as a zombie.

The biopharma world went into a bit of a frenzy on Tuesday as Nature reported that a team of Chinese scientists had become the first in the world to launch human trials of the groundbreaking CRISPR gene - editing technology.

«While more folks are out shopping themselves out as contractors at this economy, you can be their vendor of choice by just being a bit more human,» Clark says.

Us (everyone — humans) as a race is a bit disappointing.

As in liberal Protestantism, the Father was Good; the Son, being human, even better and more philanthropic (well, the Jews and Muslims dropped this bit); and keeping God's commands involved less tradition or ritual and more love of our fellow - men, all men being sons of the one Father.

You will probably decide that means your God will be able to hold on a bit longer as the Creator with humans as its special creation.

rather than seeing these as an imposed set of rules, we can see these as a benediction, empowering us to be better... a bit like visions, rules can make failures of us, where as with a benediction we are not bound, but free to become more human.

Humans have been lied to and misled about divinity, faith and God for so long, they would not know the truth if it reached up and bit them on the proverbial cheeks.Deception has been a part of the history of mankind from day one.Further changes to the Bible only indicates it is still as strong as ever.The New Testament without Christ is like a riddle without an answer.

Let me help Nathan out a bit... Christ, if you are a medical student as still think that the theory of evolution claims that the human body happened «randomly,» please leave school now and do not endanger people's lives.

John's «Blessing» is far less skeptical, far more hopeful, though every bit as wise about the human condition: We are here to remember «what light / Led us, lonely, to this place.»

Just as the world as a whole was viewed as composed of tiny bits of matter that related to one another only externally, that is, spatio - temporally, so human beings were viewed as individuals who relate to one another only externally.

Take it for the bit of fiction it is and move on as the human race should.

(Can't give you the details as I'm writing a memoir and don't wish to give the good bits away in case it gets published) Even though I have doubted all the other stuff along the years — promises etc that didn't come to pass, despite my diligent prayer and obedience, I still cry out to «something out there» because I am spirit in a human body, and know that I am on a journey that has to mean more than simply this earthly plain.

When a person takes the stories of the Bible as simply metaphorical with underlying lessons, then it becomes a bit more relevant in our human process.

The fourth step goes a bit further, to see «the trajectory eventuating in the creation of human historical existence» not «as a metaphysical surd but rather as grounded in the ultimate nature of things, in the ultimate mystery.»

These are bits of the world which may be considered as units for good human purposes, but which do not possess the unitary character of a natural moment since they are composed of such moments in external relations to one another.

I want to say that the human organism is like the agency in that there is both the unified togetherness of experience enjoyed by the director and fragmentary bits and pieces of structure which may be at odds with, out of tune with, the agency as a whole.

But if we see the Bible as both human and divine — not just divine (literalism), not just human (liberalism), and certainly not a bit of both (mix - and - match)-- then we will submit to the loving authority of God in all scripture, whether or not we find what it says easy to swallow.

Rubin skillfully examines the role of the popularizer and shows us how the population explosion crowd is willing to interfere in the most intimate of human relations, he goes a bit too far when he depicts the Club of Rome's call for global planning as totalitarian.

New Age spirituality isn't really my cup of tea, and ever since I visited India I've been a bit skeptical about Eastern religions, as they seem to perpetuate a cultural indifference toward human suffering.

To talk about privelidge in the light of that and some very difficult expereinces both he and I have had, which as human beings, has required counselling and to undermine that issue is to do every bit as much as those women expereince who have been victims, which then experience secondary vitimisation by their difficulties being swept under the carptet.

I did disagree a bit with some of what he wrote (such as on pages 23 - 27, and 75 - 94), but really appreciated his take on Romans 1 - 7, and his view that sin is basically trying to be «more than human» which only leads us to be «less than human.»

True, Hook never understood that bit of data as Maritain did, or accepted the interpretation of human life that went with it, but his experience of the movement of human intellect to utter thanks remains a phenomenon to be explained.

Okay, Dad gets a bit pis sed... often... but that was the past... (well, He's gonna be pis sed in the future here soon if the FoxNews Christians get their way)... I mean really, my child, what kind of God am I if something humans do can ruffle my feathers... well, the Bird gets pretty pis sed as well... he's a puffy mess right now, actually... Somebody clean the mess of feather and poop up please... sorry... where was I...

Vast numbers of people think that the fact of a relatively settled order of nature, along with the scientific interpretation of change and the description of the inner dynamics of human personality (and much else as well), has ruled out once and for all genuine novelty and made change nothing more than the reshuffling of bits of matter - in - motion.

A brilliant school of interpretation of Greek mythology would have it that in their origin the Greek gods were only half - metaphoric personifications of those great spheres of abstract law and order into which the natural world falls apart — the sky — sphere, the ocean - sphere, the earth - sphere, and the like; just as even now we may speak of the smile of the morning, the kiss of the breeze, or the bite of the cold, without really meaning that these phenomena of nature actually wear a human face.

@Godpot... (God — pot... I'll have to try that... seems Dad has been holding back...) and that Moses character... I'll wager there was more than just a bush burnin» up there... (wouldn't know... me and that bird were trying to figure out the physics of stuffing «God» into a human womb right about that time... I'm thinking all these characters, not just me, were a bit «touched» as my child «Reality» likes to say...: 0)

What I do see as a bit ironic, in fact, is people who call themselves scientists ignoring the entire history of human experience so as not to have a design explanation, when every indication is that it looks designed.

Along with dualistic mythology several developments in scientific thought since the seventeenth century have contributed to the exorcism of mind from nature: first, there is the cosmography of classical (Newtonian) physics picturing our world as composed of inanimate, unconscious bits of «matter» needing only the brute laws of inertia to explain their action; second, the Darwinian theory of evolution with its emphasis on chance, waste and the apparent «impersonality» of natural selection; third, the laws of thermodynamics (and particularly the second law) with the allied cosmological interpretation that our universe is running out of energy available to sustain life, evolution and human consciousness; fourth, the geological and astronomical disclosure of enormous tracts of apparently lifeless space and matter in the universe; fifth, the recent suggestions that life may be reducible to an inanimate chemical basis; and, finally, perhaps most shocking of all, the suspicion that mind may be explained exhaustively in terms of mindless brain chemistry.

And as I have said, this dying stands as the sign over every bit of human life.

@Kyle, I never suggested that I said that if research had been done in the proper fields, most rational people would question their faith I guess archaeology is bit of a stretch as it is more of a human history based field but there were civilizations more than 6000 years ago

Unfortunately, «Christian» has become a term that carries a lot of pretentiousness, so it seems to me that we might need to do a bit triage by shelving the label «Christian» if it helps us figure out what it means to be human, which may help reinvigorate the term as people see Christ in our human engagements rather than our church attendance.

A bit later, he says: «All observable things are of the same organizational type, so that human beings are analogous to material things such as rocks and bodies of water.»

Gabriella Schneider is the blogger behind Beyond the Bite where she shares AIP Paleo recipes, articles on health and the human body, as well as her personal experiences fighting back against chronic Lyme Disease.

And as this tiny human I have created squirms and wiggles and laughs and bites my shoulder with his razor - sharp little teeth, I can't help thinking that it is me he is here to teach, and not the other way around.

well i get where you come from but i wouldnt call it less passionate but more practical, i just do nt like to be butthurt ^ ^ i am fan of arsenal to enjoy the time i spend on football but if it ends in failures i try to get over its and be constructive about it, and i am not a fan of people who cant control their anger pains and have to project their frustrations onto the people who could be held responsible but not in this scale, in my opinion of the society humans should be able to control their emotions a bit and never stoop as low as to be abusive and i do think that a lot of comments on justarsenal were abusive and sorry but i do nt think of it as passionate an extreme example would be ultras you could call them muuuuch more passionate than me but in my opinion they are just scum of football, but of course i do nt want to compare the JA - commenters to ultras xD i just tried to illustrate my opinion ^ ^

Watford, westbrom, but to be honest i do nt blame losses on officials we get 90 mins to win games bit i think across the league its been poorer this year more than previous esp.linesman decisions i end up watching more than just the arsenal games but arsenal is where my heart and loyalty lies and its been week in and week across the league this year on officials i understand close offsides and fouls here and there cause football has a tremendous gray area in terms of constant action but linesman have missed multiple offsides by 5 yards and more and the consistency hasnt been there one week a call is this way next week the call is the other way but i am going to stop going on about officials as of now as you said and i agree its down human error an apart of the game

He's beating himself up in the outfield a bit, but Yasiel, friend, we're all just impressed a human being was able to cover that ground to get as close as you did.

A good debate can provoke an individual to exercise his mind a bit more, if I can raise that in people by offending them so I do not care if I offend them, better to be offended briefly and evolve as a human being than staying stubborn and ignorant, constantly upset at things which make no sense.

Maybe it is our curious nature as humans or maybe we — as sports bettors — have a bit of a masochistic streak.

While you are likely correct that humans don't always eat offal, we do eat the low quality bits of meat leftover after the slaughtering process in the product commonly known as «pink slime.»

Indeed, a good bit of what in other places would be called only «human rights» is referred to as «constitutional rights» in US discourse.

The sight of generous bonus payments as the deficit reduction plan bites and students face crippling university fees would do further damage to Mr Clegg's liberal credentials and play into the Labour account of his role as a «human shield» for the Tories.

As a (poor) analogy, arguing whether or not it's human - caused feels a bit like planning to develop real estate on a seaside clifftop which some specialists have said might suffer dangerous erosion in the next 70 years unless you put up some seawalls to prevent water action at the base of the cliff - and basing your view whether to build seawalls and other erosion defences upon whether or not there's proof that human activity would be the cause of any future erosion, rather than whether or not erosion is likely and if so how harmful it might be to your interests if nothing is done to reduce it.

As Finley Austin, Ph.D. in Human Genetics and now administrative director for the Merck Genome Research Institute, admits: «I find it a bit difficult as to how to advise someone to follow my path, since it was not what I originally set out to do.&raquAs Finley Austin, Ph.D. in Human Genetics and now administrative director for the Merck Genome Research Institute, admits: «I find it a bit difficult as to how to advise someone to follow my path, since it was not what I originally set out to do.&raquas to how to advise someone to follow my path, since it was not what I originally set out to do.»

Blacklegged nymphs rarely bite humans down South, though researchers don't agree as to why not.

The Zika virus is most commonly transmitted in humans as the result of a bite from an infected mosquito or from an infected human to another human.