Sentences with phrase «bitten a human being»

To teach a puppy to not bite a human is very important.

What about the 99 % who have never bitten a human being?

That's funny because statistics show that the most likely dog breed to attack or bite a human is the labrador retriever.

A dog must never bite another human being so do not expect him to refrain from biting another kid if he's already used to biting you.

Human aggression was stringently bred out of them, and a Pit Bull that bites a human is an anomaly within an exceptionally human - loving breed.

A dog that bit a human was promptly killed, thus selectively breeding human aggression out of this animal

Not exact matches

Both sharks and humans make antibodies to invading antigens — with one key difference: Human antibodies are shaped a bit like a serving fork, with one prong being the so - called heavy chain, and the other the light chain.

Going from ADAS to driverless car is a little bit like having a microprocessor in a human brain.

They're all male, so they won't bite anyone — only female mosquitoes bite humans.

The chatbot is at least a bit convincing with some of its jokes because humans tell bad jokes on Twitter all day.

But while humans are still behind the wheel, General Motors is turning to eye - tracking, facial recognition tech to make the streets a bit safer.

«While more folks are out shopping themselves out as contractors at this economy, you can be their vendor of choice by just being a bit more human,» Clark says.

Here are five ways to simplify human capital management (HCM) in an effort to develop and retain employees and make employers» jobs a little bit easier:

«I got really interested in trying to understand how we could model human behavior through social media because there's residue of who we are in everything we do and here we had lots of little behaviors that we could use to try to understand a little bit more about who you are.»

It's probably a mistake when a shark bites a human, she says.

You are correct, this world is better off with Religeon because God knows that the average human is not capable of standing on it's own two feet and needs a bit of a cruch in order to act even halfway civilized.

Us (everyone — humans) as a race is a bit disappointing.

It should be a light for all people since it affects the human experience quite a bit.

As in liberal Protestantism, the Father was Good; the Son, being human, even better and more philanthropic (well, the Jews and Muslims dropped this bit); and keeping God's commands involved less tradition or ritual and more love of our fellow - men, all men being sons of the one Father.

You will probably decide that means your God will be able to hold on a bit longer as the Creator with humans as its special creation.

Human nature is in deep trouble and it'll take a bit more than behavior modification to fix it.

rather than seeing these as an imposed set of rules, we can see these as a benediction, empowering us to be better... a bit like visions, rules can make failures of us, where as with a benediction we are not bound, but free to become more human.

Humans have been lied to and misled about divinity, faith and God for so long, they would not know the truth if it reached up and bit them on the proverbial cheeks.Deception has been a part of the history of mankind from day one.Further changes to the Bible only indicates it is still as strong as ever.The New Testament without Christ is like a riddle without an answer.

Let me help Nathan out a bit... Christ, if you are a medical student as still think that the theory of evolution claims that the human body happened «randomly,» please leave school now and do not endanger people's lives.

For while there are bits and pieces of new information here, the essential truths about the man — his deep (and deeply Bavarian) faith, his extraordinary intelligence, his human decency — were already on display in Seewald's three previous interview - collaborations with Ratzinger.

John's «Blessing» is far less skeptical, far more hopeful, though every bit as wise about the human condition: We are here to remember «what light / Led us, lonely, to this place.»

Just as the world as a whole was viewed as composed of tiny bits of matter that related to one another only externally, that is, spatio - temporally, so human beings were viewed as individuals who relate to one another only externally.

Any single work of literature is a recognizable bit of the gigantic circle of human interpretation.

We observe that evil has no boundaries — the very existence of torture, and the fact that human rights organisations believe that over 80 % of the world's governments practice some form of it, shows that humans are not just content to be a little bit evil, but are most willing to be CREATIVELY evil, concocting new ways to inflict pain and suffering onto others.

Take it for the bit of fiction it is and move on as the human race should.

(Can't give you the details as I'm writing a memoir and don't wish to give the good bits away in case it gets published) Even though I have doubted all the other stuff along the years — promises etc that didn't come to pass, despite my diligent prayer and obedience, I still cry out to «something out there» because I am spirit in a human body, and know that I am on a journey that has to mean more than simply this earthly plain.

So that people can see how the human body works (though admittedly, they are a bit weird, and the source of the bodies is dubious).

And it's a computer program that's in need of some new writers to put together jokes, witticisms and various bits of human - sounding things for Siri to say.

Since I have been reading your posts for a bit now, I have found you to be a sane, rational human being.

A bit of «back of the envelope» math quickly shows that «Noah's Ark» would actually have to have been an armada of ships bigger than the D Day invasion force, manned by thousands and thousands of people — and this is without including the World's 300,000 current species of plants, none of which could walk merrily in twos onto the Ark, nor the 400,000 species of beetles, nor the gnats that live for a few hours, nor for that matter, human beings!

Grounded in an understanding of human beings in relation to God, this policy may turn out to contain a good bit of humane wisdom.

Wouldn't you agree that it's a bit more ego - centric to believe that an all - powerfull divine being created humans in his image, rather then acknowledging that we're all unimportant continuous chemical reactions that coalesced by pure randomness?

These are bits of the world which may be considered as units for good human purposes, but which do not possess the unitary character of a natural moment since they are composed of such moments in external relations to one another.

I want to say that the human organism is like the agency in that there is both the unified togetherness of experience enjoyed by the director and fragmentary bits and pieces of structure which may be at odds with, out of tune with, the agency as a whole.

That is, God wants to be involved... wants to have a little bit of control of the world's development, or he wants to keep the human race developing.

Rubin skillfully examines the role of the popularizer and shows us how the population explosion crowd is willing to interfere in the most intimate of human relations, he goes a bit too far when he depicts the Club of Rome's call for global planning as totalitarian.

If only God could've been a bit clearer so our meager human intelligence could comprehend.

If you want to know / understand how God wants us to be human and so with this thought, please listen to every bit of Jeremy Myers and move into relationship with Jesus Christ and your fellow citizens of the world meant for you / us.

To expound a bit on this definition, the open view of the future holds that God chose to create a cosmos that is populated with free agents — at least humans and angels (though some hold that there is a degree of freedom, however small, in all sentient beings).

New Age spirituality isn't really my cup of tea, and ever since I visited India I've been a bit skeptical about Eastern religions, as they seem to perpetuate a cultural indifference toward human suffering.

To talk about privelidge in the light of that and some very difficult expereinces both he and I have had, which as human beings, has required counselling and to undermine that issue is to do every bit as much as those women expereince who have been victims, which then experience secondary vitimisation by their difficulties being swept under the carptet.

A proclamation of noble - sounding human rights was no doubt all the rage in the post-war era, but it rings a bit hollow to the jaded ear of post-modern man.

It's just all human cooked - up BS, just like every bit of the Bible.

If you're in the least bit interested in philosphy, then his views on the human condition should be required reading.

The experimental evidence that natural selection could build a vertebrate from an invertebrate, a mammal from a reptile, or a human from an ape is a bit less than the experimental evidence for superstring theory» that is, none at all.