Restrictions specifically targeting
black coal emissions were observed to be much better environmentally that the Maximum Feasible Technological Reduction (MFTR).
Not exact matches
«There are also other important measures to reduce methane
emissions from
coal mining, municipal waste treatment and gas distribution, for example, as well as
black carbon
emission reductions through elimination of high - emitting vehicles, use of cleaner biomass cooking and heating stoves, replacement of kerosene wick lamps with LED lamps and other measures,» adds Zbigniew Klimont of the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Austria, who also took part in the study.
It is that the rise of electricity and the power - station & «clean» domestic
coal 1940 - 1970 may have cut
black carbon more than is presently accounted for and thus with the renewed ramp - up of SO2
emissions in that period, more readily provide the cause of the 1940 - 75 temperature «hiatus».
The expert, Dr. James E. Hansen, and his colleagues conclude in a new analysis that the warming seen in recent decades has been caused mainly by other heat - trapping
emissions — methane, chlorofluorocarbons,
black particles of diesel and
coal soot and compounds that create the ozone in smog — which are easier to control than carbon dioxide, with many of them already on the decline.
Methane
emissions derive mostly from landfills, agriculture (particularly rice farming), livestock, and natural gas and
coal extraction, while soot, otherwise called «
black carbon», results from the incomplete combustion of fossil fuels and derives primarily from primitive cook stoves used throughout much of the developing world, as well as diesel engines and
coal - burning power plants.
Estimated CO2
emissions in China 1990 - 2016 broken down for
coal (brown area), oil (
black), gas (blue) and cement (grey).
Coal briquettes and traffic
emissions linked to majority of
black carbon suspended above China and East Asia
Technologies exist to rapidly reduce
black carbon
emissions from diesel and
coal sources, and fast - track mitigation efforts will have an immediate cooling effect.
My guess is that the actual outcome would involve keeping some brown
coal stations, with drying technology that reduces
emissions to a level comparable with
black coal, and some expansion of gas - fired power stations, offset by a combination of domestic offset measures and purchases of international offsets.
EVs recharged from the current mix of electricity, such as
black coal in the ACT, will only have slightly lower CO2
emissions than the average new car.
This contrasts very strongly with (for example) limiting ***
black carbon ***
emissions, e.g., from diesel vehicles and residential
coal and wood stoves.
One of Koch's collaborators, University of Illinois scientist Tami Bond, also testified that the
black carbon record in Arctic ice - cores peaked in the 1920s, and could be traced back to
emissions from U.S.
coal.
However, in India and China a lot of
coal and biomass is burned in domestic settings where inefficient low - temperature combustion and a lack of pollution controls mean that the mix of
emissions is much more complicated — carbon dioxide, of course, but also large amounts of carbon monoxide,
black carbon and sulphates.
Victoria had the highest
emissions because it relied on particularly polluting brown
coal, while NSW and Queensland burned
black coal.