Sentences with phrase «black holes»
@mikey: «End, Dark energy is imaginary, so are black holes.
http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/
Unlike God, black holes, dark matter and dark energy are measurable phenomena.
Black holes do indeed exist... we even have photographic evidence of stars whipping around an invisible (thus black) massive gravitational point at the core of our own galaxy.
If so, please note that I do not talk to dark matter or black holes as if they will grant my wishes.
So it is possible that most the mass in the universe is just black holes, dark stars, big planets, and huge asteriods.
Why do we need black holes, other universes, dead planets, stars, sec, etc..
Although astronomers had accumulated compelling evidence for black holes by observing their surroundings, the LIGO signal is the first real direct proof of their existence.
Together with Prof. Roger Penrose, he linked General Relativity with Quantum Physics in the immensely challenging context of Black Holes.
You CAN believe in a God that love enough to die for His own creation, and still publish works relating to Event Horizons of black holes.
(including all the stars, galaxies, Black Holes, Quasars, Gold, Silver, Platinum & the electrons which carry & process our monetary system today) does not need your Money!
In fiber optic communications they show up as measurable noise, they are observed streaming out of black holes,...
He did a lot of research on black holes early in the 1970s, but ended up stating that his original thesis was wrong at the Conference on General Relativity and Gravitation in 2004.
The normality of large black holes are found at every centrality of galaxies.
Nearing the very core of such awesomely huge black holes therein resides a centrality where atoms collide with such force that they release many of their atoms» electrons resulting in a wave of energy giving rise to particle jets being emitted from the said black hole's core.
«There's a deep connection between black holes and the big bang.
The spatial aggregate of many black holes dare deals with gravimetric collusions of such great values that electron dispersals of such massiveness energies being released becomes an amalgam of propensities leveraged in uniformed timely released regularities common to most all black holes gravimetric collusions.
But if you insist, we could also include Black Holes, Big Bang and other wonderful science in with the Sanat and company.
The average people will hardly ever come to terms regarding the particle physics of black holes.
I say this due the gravimetric nuances of all major celestial objects though small when compared to galactic centered black holes yet nevertheless due gravimetric oscillations of black hole designations that dare seemingly to suggest that small to ever smaller black holes may well exist within celestial stars and planets and even moons.
Black holes are found to be discharging elements at opposing angles, like sprung leaks of particle atomization being spewed nearing the speed of light.
Such black holes in the stellar and planetary configurations have black holes of the weaker varieties unlike galactic centered black holes.
The normality of large black holes is found at every centrality of galaxies.
Lunchbreaker wrote on December 11, 2012 at 2:18 pm, «Black holes discharge nothing.
No two black holes live out their life in the same measures.
The «event horizons» of varyingly sized black holes are rudimentary in appearances found to be physical in their natures thusly being as the skin so to say of the black holes.
Black holes discharge nothing.
If what you infer as being a truth then, «Why in many photos of varying spatial places regarding black holes are there opposing streams shown spewing forth»?
Within black holes there may well be a gravimetric consistency whereby atomic particles release energy via electron dispersal ratios giving rise to atoms flying apart at near light speeds from said release of electrons energy dispersal rates and not via «anti-particles» as Steve Hawking suggests.
Black holes might just seem likely to be at the central cores of all planetary and stellar objects.
They just didn't find evidence of moon sized black holes.
If black holes do exist, which they are pretty sure they do, then their gravitational signature dictates these «rules».
Do you know that just recently, some evolutionary biologists discovered that some species grow younger with age, which is contradictory to the Evolutionary Theory, and that our Solar System has no Black Holes, which is contradictory to the Big Bang Theory?
Scientists freely acknowledge the existance of millions of black holes.
Why no mention of extrasolar planets, other galaxies, black holes, etc. in any religious text?
The one on moon sized black holes in particular is a red herring.
and that our Milky Way Galaxy has no Black Holes, which is contradictory to the Big Bang Theory?..»
Arrogance, anger and desire, are the black holes of great minds, crushes it all through infinite cosmic twisters.
It is proven already black holes exist and they do not follow the law of nature as we know it.
So, an intelligent designer created the universe, with all the gamma ray bursts, and black holes spread throughout it.
Einstein postulated black holes but did not believe they actually existed in nature, only later was his postulation proven correct with evidence to support it.
Black Holes are also constantly debated and hardly understood, it is a constant battle between the General Theory of Relativity & Quantum Physics / Mechanics regarding them, especially the destruction of the data encrypted in the «Wave Function» beyond the «Event Horizon» where even light can not escape.
Every day scientists are finding black holes with gas emmmiting from it containing signs of life.
If most of science used the scientific method there would be no black holes or evolution as a means to species as theories.
Black holes existed long before we developed the understanding that they might exist, and the technology to detect them.
John P. Tarver said: «The scientific method is not used by most of science, otherwise there would be no big bang theory or evolution as a means to species in science, no black holes either.
The scientific method is not used by most of science, otherwise there would be no big bang theory or evolution as a means to species in science, no black holes either.
This week I even posted up 2 different URLs with groups of physicists proving there is no dark matter and no black holes.
You keep missing the point, most of science is not working on black holes and evolution.
It does, however, turn the eyes of theologians away from heaven and toward the earth; or, more accurately, it causes us to connect the starry heavens with the earth, as the «common» creation story claims, telling us that everything in the universe, including stars, dirt, robins, black holes, sunsets, plants and human beings, is the product of an enormous explosion billions of years ago.
Their findings dispel the so - called firewall paradox which shocked the physics community when it was announced in 2012 since its predictions about large black holes contradicted Einstein's crowning achievement - the theory of general relativity.