In «Racial grant gap» (27 August, p 5), you report that «
black scientists receive 10 per cent fewer funding awards...
Not exact matches
An in - depth analysis of grant data from the U.S. National Institutes of Health finds that
black Ph.D.
scientists were far less likely to
receive NIH funding than a white
scientist from a similar institution with the same research record.
Black Ph.D.
scientists — and not other minorities — were far less likely to
receive NIH funding for a research idea than a white
scientist from a similar institution with the same research record.
The in - depth analysis of NIH grant data finds that
black Ph.D.
scientists — and not other minorities — were far less likely to
receive NIH funding for a research idea than a white
scientist from a similar institution with the same research record.
The study is one of two NIH - funded projects — the other strips previous applications of all identifying characteristics before subjecting them to a new round of reviews — now underway that were spawned by a 2011 finding that
black scientists have a much lower chance of
receiving an NIH grant than their white counterparts.
A 2011 report showed that
black scientists applying for an R01 are a third less likely to
receive one than white
scientists (Ginter Report).
The
scientists» suspicion that a
black hole lay in the midst of the gas cloud
received a boost when further observations picked up radio waves indicative of a
black hole coming from the centre of the cloud, said Tomoharu Oka, an astronomer at Keio University in Tokyo.
Provided they are authentic about it, cautions Wilson, citing Pantene's well -
received Gold Series, formulated by a team of ten
black scientists, as a good example.