Sentences with phrase «blame the culture of»

Stumpf will have to walk a fine line between taking responsibility and not blaming the culture of the company, so as to not made senior executives seem complicit.

The independent report, published today, blames a a culture of complacency at the authority, which allowed paedophile rings to prey on vulnerable children in the area.

Arseblog in a passionate, brilliant and balanced blames the culture of «they don't like it up em» which is encouraged by the media.

Sir Michael Wilshaw blamed a culture of complacency and a lack of clear accountability in the East Midlands, which has been deemed the worst performing region in the country on a range of key indicators.

Not exact matches

Despite the shift, Stumpf said in an interview with The Wall Street Journal on Tuesday that there «was no incentive to do bad things» at Wells and laid the blame on the employees rather than the culture of the firm.

Ellison himself is credited (or blamed) for creating a culture of winning new business at any cost.

Although there is a noticeable rise in «bro culture» when it comes to the tech industry, some of the blame lands on who is actually applying for the jobs.

Many are blaming Uber's woes on the rise of bro culture.

It's made me think twice about the way I question people, the way I think about victims and accused aggressors, and what my role is in perpetuating this destructive culture of victim blaming.

Pundits blame everything from neuroscience to Upworthy for this cathartic interruption of advertising's jokey assault on pop culture, when it was actually the jokes that were doing the interrupting.

When you create a culture of accountability, employees have less reason to use language that indicates blame or resentment, and results in a toxic workplace.

From blaming the victim to the way lyrics which glorify rape and smacking or killing your «bitch» seem to go unnoticed by people who should be in an uproar about it, to the ridiculously light sentences handed out to perpetrators of rape and even murder of a woman or child, our culture is tacitly condoning this mind - set by their very silence.

«Patriarchy» is traditionalism but you can't just pick everything you hate and blame it on male rule because we had plenty of queens making rules over the centuries and Victorian culture being the most oppressive was by guess whom?

On top of this, we heard Christian leaders blame culture and the media for popularizing sex.

They blamed the media for its constant barrage of sexual messaging and accused our culture for eroding our moral foundation.

This a staggeringly unhealthy narrative to promote to our children about the way sexuality works, and plays directly into the hands of a rape culture such as the one in which we live: If you are a woman and ever get catcalled, abused, molested, raped or any number of other sexual advances, you are probably at least partially to blame.

Where the suicide of Chester's close friend and Soundgarden / Audio Slave vocalist Chris Cornell two months ago was greeted with universal public grief, the loss of Linkin Park's Chester Bennington has triggered everything from blame to abhorrent humor, which is both a tragic misreading of pop culture and outright dangerous behavior that could directly lead to additional loss of life.

Many Christian women I know are seeking counseling to remedy sexual dysfunction within their marriages — dysfunction that relates back to an oppressive culture that refuses to acknowledge female sexuality and which blames women for perversions of male sexuality.

Both feed into objectification of women, rape culture, victim blaming, slut shaming, and married couples who can't get past a deep sense of shame whenever they have or try to have sex.

But as much as I would love to blame the culture or the church (or men) for all of our misery, I'm pretty convinced that the only way women can ever be happy again is if we cut ourselves some slack.

When the majority of the culture decides that LGBTQs have been denied rights, treated poorly, bullied and so on (I think that time is at hand, whether or not we agree with the opinion of the culture), where will the blame fall?

They speak of church cultures that treated women's bodies as inherently problematic and seductive, that assigned a woman's worth to her sexual purity or procreative prowess, that questioned women's ability to think rationally or make decisions without the leadership of men, that blamed victims of sexual abuse for inviting the abuse or tempting the abuser, that shamed women who did not «joyfully submit» to their husband and find contentment in their roles as helpers and homemakers, and that effectively silenced victims of abuse by telling women and children that reporting the crime would reflect poorly on the church and thus damage the reputation of Christ.

Noll blames the populist culture of Evangelicalism as antithetical to the life of the mind when it is this emphasis on folk culture that mounted a serious resistance to disenchantment.

It was easy for me, then, to become cynical about the faith that I was raised in, to punch the holes into the theology of the people I grew up with and spot the gaps in the preaching and methods, and point a finger of blame when «they» got it wrong, to separate myself from the culture and, like most kids raised by immigrant parents (because, in a way, my parents were like immigrants to this strange new land of Christianity), I took for granted my life in the new Kingdom, completely unable to imagine a life without freedom, without joy, without Jesus.

True — I blame the over-sexualized culture we live in which is a direct by - product of the growth of the medium of advertising and the sexual revolution.

He saw how the values of a culture, as these are incarnated in the attitudes and behavior of parents, are internalized by children as they experience these values in the rewards punishment, praise - blame responses of their parents.

Speaking during Premier's News Hour, she said: «We have whole issues with purity culture and modesty culture which says, «well, women, if you dress a certain way it's your fault if a man behaves in that way» and so actually for a lot of women they have been conditioned to blame themselves and say «if he's done that to me it must be my fault».

The problem is that our liberal culture encourages us to respond to these experiences of unhappiness by blaming the ever - so - slight remnants of the traditional «NO!»

She hints that at least part of this myopia must be blamed on Samuel Huntington's hugely influential «clash of civilizations» argument, which led many to believe that the world is «currently polarized between a Muslim monolith, bent on violence, and the democratic cultures of Europe and North America.»

Sacks argues that in the history of the West, anti-Semitism is a key symptom of a culture in crisis, looking for a scapegoat on which to blame its troubles.

Is there a peculiar form of a temptation toward irresponsibility concerning oneself here — the temptation to blame one's genes, one's parents, one's culture for one's choices?

Rather they have been happy to suggest, - more often by subtle implication and spin than with straightforward candour - that (i) the priesthood is fairly riddled with abusers, (ii) there is an international culture of cover - up in the Church which (iii) goes right to the top of the Church, and (iv) that Catholic institutions such as celibacy and hierarchy are to blame — even that Catholic teaching of children about its sexual morality is a form of intellectual abuse of large numbers of children.

The conscience of a child is formed as he internalizes the values and taboos of his culture which are screened through the praise - blame, reward - punishment systems of his parents.

Can we blame our culture for the prevalence of domestic violence in the UK?

We are meant to empathize with the harsh realities of cyber-bullying, victim - blaming and rape culture in the life of the American teenager.

Anyone blaming Sanchez has a short memory, what is happening now at Arsenal isn't new.It has happened before with the likes of rvp, fab and nasri.It is a culture created and nurtured by Wenger whereby anyone who dares question him is vilified and hounded out of the club while the yes men are guaranteed a starting spot despite poor form week in week out.Players who actually merit being in the first eleven are kept out by under par players who have nothing to show for their guaranteed 90 mins every game.Guys like Podolski and Campbell were pushed out in favor of sanogo and akpom.Perez will be next to go because Iwobi is Wenger's new love child.it's quite clear that for you to have long career at Arsenal, never question Wenger and as one pundit put it....»

We're tired of the blame others culture: the referee, the pitch, the packed schedule, the injuries.

It's hard to blame the academic, so - called «book learned» types that typically compete (and often do extremely well) on TV's «Jeopardy!» when questions more of the pop culture nature, or say, sports variety don't exactly go their way.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Allocation of blame has been a fundamental part of the culture at Arsenal, and I would gladly see the back of Wenger if I felt that it would go with him, but I doubt that.

This is not about apportioning blame but we need to get away from this culture of ignoring our talent while ignoring the deficiencies of big money signings.

Blame it on porn, blame it on hookup culture, blame it on the number of 20 - somethings still living it home — maybe it's all of that or some of that or none of Blame it on porn, blame it on hookup culture, blame it on the number of 20 - somethings still living it home — maybe it's all of that or some of that or none of blame it on hookup culture, blame it on the number of 20 - somethings still living it home — maybe it's all of that or some of that or none of blame it on the number of 20 - somethings still living it home — maybe it's all of that or some of that or none of that.

The aim is to shift blame away from individual mothers to the failure of the unsupportive culture.

In a culture that blames victims for their own abuse and questions their motives before those of the abuser, doing so takes immense courage.

«Rape culture is your mother laying blame at your feet»: Survivors share their stories in support of the...

TIME, the blame for mother guilt does not lie with attachment parenting or with any other type of parenting philosophy or culture — the complexity and balancing act of motherhood, encompassing mommy guilt or even typical healthy doubt as we navigate our way, existed before attachment parenting resurfaced.

In any case, it's unfortunate that women are guilted for not nursing when a big chunk of blame should fall on our culture.

Hollywood actor Matt Damon sets out director Charles Ferguson's argument as to why the crash happened, and why the blame lies squarely with the risk culture and unregulated reign of the financial sector.

Although he blames the social deprivation in his Sunderland South constituency on Thatcher and the Tories, he is critical of a benefits culture among his constituents.

36 % of voters blame Brown for presiding over a dirty tricks culture in Downing Street but a larger proportion, 50 % do not.