Sentences with phrase «blamed for accidents because»

It is common for motorcyclists to be blamed for accidents because even today bikers are seen as a criminal element and the added skill and danger involved in riding is stigmatized.

Not exact matches

Often its just an accident (awkward fall into the boards, etc.), so I don't blame them for not jumping to conclusions that someone needs their bell rung just because a player is on the ice.

Although Miller says he wasn't the only one to blame for the accident, adding that much of the crew, from the location manager and production designer to the cinematographer and assistant director also «made mistakes,» «I have taken responsibility because I could have asked more questions, and I was the one in charge,» the AP reports.

This can be because of fines imposed due to employee errors (such as not following waste disposal guidelines) or from lawsuits originating from employees themselves (for example, when they blame a workplace accident on a lack of workplace compliance training).

For a decade, Einar Gilkyson has blamed her for the accident that took his son's life, and he has chosen to go on living himself largely because his oldest friend couldn't otherwise surviFor a decade, Einar Gilkyson has blamed her for the accident that took his son's life, and he has chosen to go on living himself largely because his oldest friend couldn't otherwise survifor the accident that took his son's life, and he has chosen to go on living himself largely because his oldest friend couldn't otherwise survive.

It can happen because of something dumb you did with the dog, or because the dog has a weak temperament, or it can happen purely by accident and the dog «blamed» that person for hurting them.

Just because you were in a car accident does not mean that you are to blame for it.

Just because a cyclist contravenes any provision of Section 183 of the Motor Vehicle Act does not necessarily mean that the cyclist will be to blame for the accident.

Modified Comparative Negligence: The pedestrian will not be able to recover because it has been determined that he is more than 50 % to blame for the accident.

That is because, you can expect the insurance adjuster will tell you that there insured is not to blame for the accident and give you reasons why and how the presumption of fault can be rebutted.

According to the law, because the victim is partly to blame, the defendant will not have to pay for that percentage of the accident that was the victim's own fault.

This is important because we can use these tickets as evidence to prove that the aggressive driver was to blame for your accident and injuries.

Because of this doctrine, a defendant's insurer will be looking for any reason you are partially or fully to blame for an accident.

Additionally, if you are to blame in an accident and carry single - limit liability insurance, the injured party's attorney may press for a higher amount in a settlement because there is no limit (with the exception of the total coverage limit) to bodily injury coverage.

Another concern with no fault systems is that because you need to claim your damages even if you are not at fault for the accident, you could experience higher premiums even though you are not to blame.