Sentences with phrase «blameless if»

The marksman may also be blameless if the shell does not go off.

Not exact matches

If he was simply following Gods instructions then Satan is blameless and God is the source of all evil.

If a man sets himself a goal for his endeavor here in this life, and he fails to reach it, then, in the judgment of eternity, it is quite possible that he may be blameless.

1 Timothy 3:2 A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach; 1 Timothy 3:5 (For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God?)

Secondly, I persist that 21:21 clearly states that if a master beats his slave and he survives for a day or two and then dies, the master is held blameless.

If God demanded the death of an innocent and blameless person before forgiving anybody, if God turned away even from those who repented until someone else suffered for their sins, if God demanded the pain and blood of the cross before admitting anyone into right relationship... what kind of blood - thirsty, sadistic being would this bIf God demanded the death of an innocent and blameless person before forgiving anybody, if God turned away even from those who repented until someone else suffered for their sins, if God demanded the pain and blood of the cross before admitting anyone into right relationship... what kind of blood - thirsty, sadistic being would this bif God turned away even from those who repented until someone else suffered for their sins, if God demanded the pain and blood of the cross before admitting anyone into right relationship... what kind of blood - thirsty, sadistic being would this bif God demanded the pain and blood of the cross before admitting anyone into right relationship... what kind of blood - thirsty, sadistic being would this be?

Christ intends to present you — holy, spotless, and blameless — in God's presence, if you remain firm in the faith, rooted and grounded in him, unswerving from the hope of the good news you have heard, the good news declared not only to men and women on earth, but to all created beings under heaven.

A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, temparate, sober - minded, of good behavior, hospitable, able to teach; not given to wine, not violent, not greedy for money, but gentle, not quarrelsome, not covetous; one who rules his own house well, having his children in submission with all reverence (for if a man does not know how to rule his own house, how will he take care of the church of God?)

You use the word «blameless» - free of guilt; not subject to blame: synonyms: innocent, guiltless, above reproach, irreproachable, unimpeachable, in the clear, exemplary, perfect, virtuous, pure, impeccable, faultless; The master is only «blameless» if he was chastising the slave as was customary and not to cause harm but correct behavior or consequence for criminal behavior.

The way that it is written is «If, however, the slave survives for a day or two...» meaning that if the slave survives for a day (or two) and then dies on day three the master is blamelesIf, however, the slave survives for a day or two...» meaning that if the slave survives for a day (or two) and then dies on day three the master is blamelesif the slave survives for a day (or two) and then dies on day three the master is blameless.

Here is my logic — If the master beats his own slave and the slave survives for one or two days, and then dies, the master is held blameless «because he owns the slave».

If the master has not broken the law HE REMAINS BLAMELESS IN THE EYES OF THE LAW.

I still persist that it clearly states that if a master beats a slave badly and the slave does not die immediately but hangs on for a day or two before dying, the master is held blameless.

If the slave lives the master is NOT blameless and the verse does not say that in anyway.

Not that there are no consequences but because the master has already borne the consequence of action that was not «blameless» Perhaps the word property is a problem, here is the king James translation: 21 Notwithstanding, if he continue a day or two, he shall not be punished: for he is his money.

Now, if damaged such that there was loss of ability for work then the master is not blameless.

But if we are blameless, what is the meaning of cowardice?

Conte of course is not blameless in all of this but if we're going to be reasonable, we can look at City from last season.

Whatever your argument is let's agree Wenger blameless or not, needs to go even if for the sake of just getting in someone else new.

Of course Ozil isn't blameless, but I feel giving him a new expensive contract would be a huge risk, even if we have a new manager for next season.

Let me guess, if we'd won, Wenger would have had a huge influence, but we lose yet again to Mourinho, and Wenger is somehow blameless!

If a SIDS death occurs in a crib the parents are considered mostly blameless, whereas if a SIDS death occurs during bed - sharing, pathologists are told to automatically consider it suffocation, and parents are blameIf a SIDS death occurs in a crib the parents are considered mostly blameless, whereas if a SIDS death occurs during bed - sharing, pathologists are told to automatically consider it suffocation, and parents are blameif a SIDS death occurs during bed - sharing, pathologists are told to automatically consider it suffocation, and parents are blamed.

If Scottish independence were the result, the Conservatives would not be blameless.

«I don't know if she's completely blameless but having worked on the movie and heard her story — the environment that she grew up in, the abusive mother that I portray, the figure skating community that wouldn't embrace her — I have a great deal more empathy for her.

This is not to say that educators are blameless, but if one wanted to ascribe blame, one would have to start far higher up the chain of command.

Even if you're blameless, it can still take many thousands or tens of thousands of dollars to provide a defense, so having E&O is an effective and inexpensive sleep aid: a good decision.

If the argument is that these entities (companies, states, etc.) are in effect blameless as it's the consumers who are to blame, then the follow - up is that the consumers should pay for the adaptation costs.

If you do, in my view you'll be blameless.

If you had a tough compliance policy and were following it, when the company, which might otherwise be blameless, is caught in an act committed by an isolated employee it can demonstrate that steps were taken to try and prevent anything from happening.

Even if you have lived a perfect, blameless life, someone else using the same name online could have a very bad online reputation that negatively impacts you.