Sentences with phrase «blatant falsehood»

The phrase "blatant falsehood" refers to a statement or claim that is obviously false or untrue. It means that the lie is easily noticeable or evident. Full definition
The pro-AB 32 speaker gave the familiar litany of issues, highly distorted some facts, and with blatant falsehoods thrown in.
But, like its predecessors, it airs blatant falsehoods about environmentalists and fits snugly into the corporate agenda.
The opposition New Patriotic Party (NPP) has described as blatant falsehood a claim by Radio Show Host Adakabre Frimpong Manso, that the party's Flagbearer Nana Akufo - Addo, once threatened his life and abused him because he was unhappy with his work on radio.
What's most disturbing is the AFP's willingness to use blatant falsehoods to stir the passions of its genuinely angry base of tea partiers — again, that's sort of what the AFP has come to be known for, I suppose, with its gross distortion of facts during the health care reform process.
Can they promote products with blatant falsehoods?
Both of these are «blatant falsehoods,» Mayer said on the earnings call, and the figures have been «exaggerated by a factor of three.»
White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders looks the press in the eye and tells a blatant falsehood.
The report was a blatant falsehood, really defamatory.
It is blatant falsehood,» he fumed.
We know that Councilman Dromm — a longtime supporter of human and animal rights — won't be bullied by these blatant falsehoods,» said John Eddy, a spokesman for NYCLASS.
Soremekun said, «What Governor Ayodele Fayose has accused me of is a blatant falsehood.
Destiny, on the other hand, calls itself a «next generation first - person shooter, with rich cinematic storytelling,» and that's a blatant falsehood.
You repeatedly post deliberate, blatant falsehoods.
Institutional science is adopting the modern political technique of ramming ideologically motivated junk down the public throat regardless of its blatant falsehood.
It's bad enough that your argument essentially consists of wholesale slander of scientists as liars, but employing a blatant falsehood not even supported by your «sources» is downright dumb and self - defeating.
I will leave it to Ferdinand Engelsteen to correct the blatant falsehoods that Richard S Courtney is spewing (and, unfortunately, continuing to spew) in this thread.
NAT Geo pops up again with another blatant falsehood designed to deceive its audience.
When challenged on this blatant falsehood by Paul Norton of Griffith, the SMH provided the following response
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z