Sentences with phrase «blind review»

This fully evidence - based certification is awarded based on double - blind review of an application that demonstrates an individual's proficiency in facilitating performance improvement.

That may also explain why women were not more likely to demand double blind reviews than men, he says.

What the committee looks for in terms of big - picture criteria in blind review of portfolio samples:

The examination is comprehensive and consists of three modules, which include writing two 1000 + word articles on resume writing or related topics, preparation of two resumes for blind review by the Certification Team, and a timed written examination.

All complete applications will undergo blind review conducted by three or more Foundation members.

They chose double - blind reviews most often for papers in the group's most prestigious journal, Nature (14 %), compared to 12 % for Nature «sister journals» and 9 % for the open - access journal Nature Communications.

Update, 24 September, 4.30 p.m.: A previous version of this story did not mention that the conclusions of a study finding that double - blind review benefited female authors in Behavioral Ecology has been challenged.

All require double - blind review with triangulated supporting data and attestations.

Margo Wolowiec solo show Double Blind reviewed by Jonathan T. D. Neil in the April issue of ArtReview.

The designation is awarded based on double - blind review of a leadership team - submitted online CSIS - System ™ application.

One famous example: In 2011, The Wall Street Journal arranged for a blind review of suits from Suitsupply, J. Crew, Hart Schaffner Marx, H&M, Target and Armani.

The authors found that reviewers (n = 119) were more likely to recommend acceptance when the prestigious authors» names and institutions were visible (single - blind review) than when they were redacted (double - blind review)(87 percent vs 68 percent) and also gave higher ratings for the methods and other categories.

Most medical journals practice single - blind review (authors» identities known to reviewers), but double - blind review (authors» identities masked to reviewers) may improve the quality of reviews.

The study, presented last week at the eighth International Congress on Peer Review in Chicago, Illinois, also found that papers submitted for double - blind review are far less likely to be accepted.

A 2007 study of Behavioral Ecology found that the journal published more articles by female authors when using double - blind reviews — although that conclusion was challenged by other researchers a year later.

Authors choosing double - blind review in hope of improving their chances of success will be disappointed by the Nature study.

Burgman says he thinks making double - blind reviews the standard, as Conservation Biology has done, is the best course.

The study, presented here at the Eighth International Congress on Peer Review, also found that papers submitted for double - blind review are far less likely to be accepted.

In a survey of more than 4000 researchers published in 2013, three - quarters said they thought double - blind review is «the most effective method.»

And only 25 % of papers under double - blind review were eventually accepted, versus 44 % for papers that went the single - blind route.

In only 12 % of cases did the authors opt for double - blind review.

At Conservation Biology, which switched to double - blind reviews in 2014, reviewers who make a guess get it right about half of the time, says the journal's editor, Mark Burgman of Imperial College London.

Only 8 % of those papers were actually sent out for review after being submitted, compared to 23 % of those opting for single - blind review.

Double - blind review, he says, «sends a message that you're determined to try and circumvent any unconscious bias in the review process.»

Double - blind reviews, the argument goes, would remove those prejudices.

Some 32 % of Indian authors and 22 % of Chinese authors opted for double - blind review, compared with only 8 % of authors from France and 7 % from the United States.

Burgman suspects that the demand for double - blind review is suppressed by fears that it could backfire on the author.

A study published in the 27 September edition of JAMA, the Journal of the American Medical Association, examined how bias impacts the peer review process of medical journals by comparing what happens when study authors are identified for reviews, known as a single - blind review, and when the identity of study authors is kept from reviewers, known as double - blind reviews.

All TeachingWorks working papers are subject to a blind review process that focuses on the relevance of the proposed work to pressing problems in teacher education, the transparency and relevance of the methods to the questions asked, as well as the quality of the writing.

It is awarded based on double - blind review of a candidate - submitted online CSIS ™ application.

I agree with Rick's approach to the double blind reviewing.

In a blind review process, a joint committee of LWI and ALWD evaluated the proposals and made funding recommendations, which both Boards affirmed.

A period of four weeks will allow the certification committee to perform a blind review of the portfolio and assess the Competency Review.

This is for our tracking purposes, but your name will be removed to maintain confidentiality of identity in the blind review process by our certification committee.

All manuscripts submitted to ECA are required to undergo a blind review, conducted by experienced early childhood professionals before being accepted for publication.

The review process All manuscripts submitted to Early Childhood Australia are required to undergo a blind review, conducted by experienced early childhood professionals before being accepted for publication.

Do not include the name (s) of author (s) anywhere except on the cover page as all manuscripts are subject to a blind review.

A second researcher (ER) blind reviewed 85 articles (20 %) randomly selected from the 425 studies of psychology and infertility treatment, with no resulting conflict of opinion over the studies for inclusion.