Sentences with phrase «blogging about court cases»

Medina County Common Pleas Judge James Kimbler is combining his love of the rule of law with his passion for teaching by blogging about court cases.

Not exact matches

I blogged sometime ago about a New Jersey case where a Court found that someone sending a text to someone else who he knows is driving can be held liable — along with the driver — for the resulting crash and injuries caused to others.

In support of her request for a stay, Teng cited the Supreme Court's recent decision in R.v. Jordan (an important recent case which we've previously blogged about) which sets a 30 - month time limit between an accused arrest and the end of their trial.

As we've previously blogged about, Ontario courts subsequently changed their practices with respect to any cases that entered the system after the SCC's ruling.

Last week I blogged about some stats on decisions in civil cases at the Ontario Court of Appeal.

«D.C. Gun Case May Shoot to the Supreme Court Main Everything You Wanted to Know About Adam Smith (Also, a Lesson in the Benefits of Blogging)»

But as civil justice fans everywhere also know, today is the day that the U.S. Supreme Court is hearing arguments for what could be the most consequential case of the term (and one we've been blogging about for months!)

But back at the office, they'd heave a sigh of relief about not having to aggregate and manage a half dozen small clients for an appeal (as I often do to make appeals and federal court cases affordable) or fritter away valuable billable time blogging or playing on Twitter in a desperate effort to compensate for the kind of credibility and connections that biglaw automatically confers.

The case was an appeal from a decision by the BC Court of Appeal, about which I blogged here.

In a prior blog post, we blogged about a case (3716724 Canada Inc. v. CCC No. 375) where the Court determined that a condominium corporation had unfai...

Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard the oral arguments in the B.C. hearing fees case, now known as Trial Lawyers Association of British Columbia v. British Columbia (Attorney General), a case I have much blogged about as it made its way through the B.C. courts (where it was known Villardell v. Dunham, both on trial and on appeal).

Around this time last year, we blogged about the decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (the «ONSC») in Jane Doe 464533 v ND («Jane Doe «-RRB-, a case that effectively created a new privacy tort — «public disclosure of embarrassing private facts» (you can read our post here).

Recently, I blogged about child custody cases that become trapped in the family court system.