Sentences with phrase «blood atonement»

So unless we are covered with the blood atonement there is no remission of our sins.

Under the O.T. it's all about the blood atonement.

By the fundamentalist Protestant type we mean those churches which hold to the verbal inspiration and hence the literal inerrancy of the Bible, and which defend as of vital importance certain creedal dogmas, notably the virgin birth, the blood atonement, the physical resurrection of Christ, and his visible second coming.

There is no necessity for human perfection or for blood atonement.

The LDS church besides being based on absolute fantasy matched only by scientology (and followed closely by christianity and Islam) is ruled by old white men who only begrudgingly gave up polygamy and blood atonement.

They have a belief in «Blood Atonement» — 1984 — the Lafferty brothers slit the throats of their young sister in law and her 9 month old baby.

They have no remorse, they believe they are in the right of this blood atonement.

«Avenging Angels» — Brigham Youngs murderers — they did his bidding like the Mason Family Mountain Meadows Massacre — the massacre of 30 men 40 women and 70 children in Utah by the «Avenging Angels» see «Blood of the Prophets» by Will Bagley (mormon author) Blood Atonement — the practice of the mormons that atones for the death of its members and / or the act of which the mormons retaliate when they do not believe one is following what they think is right — google the 1984 murder the Lafferty brothers commited in Utah of their sister in - law and her 9 month old daughter by slitting their throats.

Bishop Romney has taken the secret oath of blood atonement in the Salt Lake City temple... he is sworn to secrecy about the ceremonies and oaths that take place in the temple.

Denying the substitutionary blood atonement aspect of Jesus» death really runs contrary to the Scriptures and the historical understanding of the Gospel.

Perhaps most of us stressed His Death and Blood Atonement to the point where it seemed we were neglecting the Resurrection's role and power in these areas.

You need blood atonement, and that was made provision for by the blood of the Lord Jesus Christ.

«Mormon celestial polygamy» «the planet Kolob» «Mormon underwear» «posthumous Mormon sealing» «Mormon blood atonement» «posthumous baptism» «Mountain Meadows Massacre» «Mormon 1978 Black people»

«mormon celestial polygamy» «the planet kolob» «mormon underwear» «posthumous mormon sealing» «mormon blood atonement» «posthumous baptism» «Mountain Meadow Massacre»

Beware the Mormon who smiles and will not answer — he has taken the oath of Blood Atonement — agreeing to sacrifice your life if secrets are revealed, okay to slit my throat if I am deemed a sinner by the church because that is the only way to save me.

This is the religion of polygamy, patriarchy, and Blood Atonement.

Not exact matches

«No Country for Old Men» faced some serious competition in the race for best picture («There Will Be Blood,» «Juno,» «Atonement,» «Michael Clayton»), but it still managed to triumph.

Obviously, today's followers of Paul et al's «magic - man» are also a bit on the odd side believing in all the Christian mumbo jumbo about bodies resurrecting, and exorcisms, and miracles, and «magic - man atonement, and infalliable, old, European, white men, and 24/7 body / blood sacrifices followed by consumption of said sacrifices.

@ Concert: «I believe like a child that suffering will be healed and made up for, that all the humiliating absurdity of human contradictions will vanish like a pitiful mirage, like the despi.cable fabrication of the impotent and infinitely small Euclidean mind of man, that in the world's finale, at the moment of eternal harmony, something so precious will come to pass that it will suffice for all hearts, for the comforting of all resentments, for the atonement of all the crimes of humanity, for all the blood that they've shed; that it will make it not only possible to forgive but to justify all that has happened.»

Obviously, today's followers / singers of Paul et al's «magic - man» are also a bit on the odd side believing in all the Christian mumbo jumbo about virgin births and bodies resurrecting, and exorcisms, and miracles, and «magic - man atonement, and infallible, old, European, white men, and 24/7 body / blood sacrifices followed by consumption of said sacrifices.

The Jewish people have 3 aspects for atonement (1) blood sacrifice (2) repentence (3) charity — according to the Law and Prophets.

That He is divine, that He is the ONLY Savior of ALL mankind, that it is through his blood and atonement that we receive salvation and in NO OTHER WAY!.

If you check into the atonement Jesus» blood sacrifice is compared to the sacrifice of the bull once a year (in Hebrews) for all the people.

It is appalling that the word «atonement» is used, but they do NOT believe that Jesus Christ is the ONLY son of God and the ONLY WAY that one can obtain salvation - through His blood that was shed on the cross on Calvary!

romeny took the Blood of Atonement Oath in the Temple in the late 1980s — He has sworn his first allegiance to the church.He is regaled and powerful in the church because his gggg grandfather, Parley Pratt, was a founding member.

17:11 For the life of the flesh is in the blood, and I have given it for you on the altar to make atonement for your souls, for it is the blood that makes atonement by the life.

Even the misuse of blood was punishable by death under the Mosaic law, with it to be used only for atonement.

God is Redeeming Books, Redeeming Scripture, Redeeming Theology Bible & Theology Topics: atonement, Books by Jeremy Myers, Books I'm Writing, crucifixion of Jesus, death of Jesus, Kindle, Nothing But the Blood of Jesus

God is One Verse, Redeeming Scripture, Redeeming Theology Bible & Theology Topics: atonement, blood, crucifixion, cruciform, crucivision, death of Jesus, Hebrews 9:22, Leviticus 17:11, subst, Theology of God, Theology of Jesus, Theology of Salvation, Theology of Sin

Sin requires substitution and atonement and blood, and God makes that very clear throughout all of scripture.

This would require the courts to come to grips with the significant stupidity of bodily resurrections, changing bread and water / wine into bodies and blood, atonement of sin et al..

In light of this pattern, we can appreciate that the shed blood of Christ, the «Lamb of God,» made permanent atonement for mankind, and also made it possible for people to be ``... clothed with power from on high» (Luke 24:49).

For the life of a creature is in the blood, and I have given it to you to make atonement for yourselves on the altar; it is the blood that makes atonement for one's life.

I read your post (but not the book, yet) on the non-violent atonement, and I am unsure how to understand verses such as «Without the shedding of blood there is no remission» in the light of your «non-violent» concept; it's unclear to me.

The recent editorial in Faith on that very subject would have perhaps given him the fuller Catholic vision, which places the Atonement within the perspective of the absolute Primacy of Christ in creation and the solidarity and identity of humanity in his Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity.

[20] The most solemn sin offering occurred once a year as the High Priest sprinkled blood in the Holy of Holies in atonement for the sins of the nation.

A large area of historic Christian theology would have been completely altered if ideas of atonement, especially as related to the blood of Christ, had not been carried over from primitive concepts associated with animal sacrifice.

In the Old Testament a spotless lamb was required as a blood sacrifice for atonement.

In order for our permanent atonement a blood sacrifice of a spotless human is required.

Do your books Atonement of God and Nothing but the Blood lay out your full views on this issue?

You'd do well to look into the old ways of the «two» priests it required for the atonement of sin of the people — one for the inner court and one for the outer court, and the two animals — the spotless sacrificial lamb, and the scapegoat of whom the blood of that sacrificial lamb was placed and sent into the wilderness.

And remember father god does not forgive — first he needs blood for Atonement!!

6) I have already given several verses showing the sin - bearing nature of Jesus» cross, I just want to point out again Romans 3:25 & 26: God presented Christ as a sacrifice of atonement, through the shedding of his blood — to be received by faith.

The fact that the Bible says that the money was atonement for your souls, shows that blood alone was not needed.

God presented Christ as sacrificial atonement through His blood!

The idea wasn't that the blood of bulls and goats somehow «appeased God,» the sacrificial system was foreshadowing the time when God Himself would make the ultimate atonement for sins.

I have written some about it on this website, but the best explanation is found in my two books: «The Atonement of God» and «Nothing but the Blood of Jesus.»

Now, blood was the best way for atonement because it required the sinner to play an active role in the sacrificial process by giving up and slaughtering his own animal, however not everyone owned animals which is why God arranged alternate processes to give flour and money as atonement offerings.

Now we come to the key phrase: «whom God put forward as a sacrifice of atonement by his blood, effective through faith.»

For there is no distinction, since all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God; they are now justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, whom God put forward as a sacrifice of atonement by his blood, effective through faith.