Sentences with phrase «blood sacrifice for sin»

It doesn't look like an animal sacrifice is a slam dunk in the first chapters of Gen. And it's a bad hermenutic to say that's a blood sacrifice for sin is what is happening in Gen. 3.

Not exact matches

So then no Adam and Eve = no original sin = Jesus didn't need to be sent to die for my sins by a God who concluded «He» couldn't forgive us without one more blood sacrifice.

That a God, to undo a rule he created, sends a man to be sacrificed as a blood atonment for all our sins, which he is directly responsible for so that we can all go and live in a cloud theme park.

And then Jesus came upon his disciples and said, «What's this shit I've been hearing about me being a human sacrifice for your sins!!? Who in the goddamned hell came up with that Neanderthal bullshit!!!? What are we, living in the fucking Stone Age!!!!? Blood sacrifice!!!!!!!!!!!?? Are you fucking kidding me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!??? Listen, brethren, thou can takest that pathetic, immoral, sadistic, evil, sickening, disgusting pile of Cro - Magnon donkey shit and shove it straight up thy fucking asses!!!»

Even before that, there is evidence of the necessity of blood sacrifice (Cain and Abel) for forgiveness of sin.

The Blood atoned for our sins and God sees all humanity through the Blood Sacrifice of Jesus.

What God is looking for is repentence and a turning to him rather than a turning away from him.God instituted the animal sacrifices to show just how bad sin was so we would be sorry that we greived him.For us to be made right there has to be a choice to turn from sin and follow him and out of that decision there should be a desire to walk in his ways.Under the old law part of that obedience was to make offerings however it was by faith in God that made the person righteous and not the blood of animals.

Under the law (Old Testament), the consequences for sin or payment for sin required a blood sacrifice.

This is unmistakably blood sacrifice language - the Messiah would be the lamb who who pay the price for our sin.

The blood sacrifices God instructed Moses to institute as part of Israel's worship of Him were meant to pave the way for the only and ultimate blood sacrifice that could save humanity from our sin.

The writer believes that blood can wash away sins and hence sacrifice is essential for the forgiveness of sins.

Most specifically, we need to rid ourselves of this idea that God is angry at us for our sin and needs to be appeased through blood and sacrifice.

For there is no distinction, since all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God; they are now justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, whom God put forward as a sacrifice of atonement by his blood, effective through faith.

Jesus went willingly to the cross, not because a blood sacrifice was necessary to pay the penalty for sin, but because going to the cross unmasked the scapegoat mechanism, revealed the violence inherent within the heart of men, exposed the myth of redemptive violence, and brought an end to the war that men had waged on God for centuries.

But, the point is, all 3 Persons of the Trinity, The Father, The Son, and the Holy Spirit, all agreed that the Sacrifice of Jesus's blood was the only way for sin to be forgiven, and for the debt to be paid for, so we didn't have to face the judgment that our sins deserve, an eternity in a lake of fire.

Sorry to tell ya, but the Jews succeded in the death of Jesus... what I don't understand is your use of that as a basis for hating Jews... You reveal your complete ignorance fo salvation... such as without the death and resurrection of Jesus -LCB- which ceretainly did happen as I am this day a witness of his resurrection -RCB-, there woudl be no asis for the gentiles for salvation... you see his blood was shed for the atoning sacrifice for the sins of all the world not just gentile but Jew as well..

The blood represents the sacrifice for sins showing the serious nature of mankind's rebellion from God and the proof of God's love for us.

The rationale of sacrifice in general may of course throw some light on the theory of the atonement, but even so, what a primitive mythology it is, that a divine Being should become incarnate, and atone for the sins of men through his own blood!

-- not missing from the New Testament explicitly and not missing from today's Old Testament in the thread of blood sacrifice needed for atonement of sin in the form of a perfect «Lamb of God»

Jesus, was born as a savior, without sin, as a sacrifice, to shed His Blood, for me... And to take away the sin of the world.

He sent his son to be a sacrifice (because the only way to pay for sin is by blood... your blood, or his), so that whosever believes in him shall not be destroyed, but have everlasting life.

I am saying that God has always loved and always forgiven all people for all sins, and that God did not need blood sacrifice or the death of Jesus in order to love us or forgive us.

i do believe that the death of Jesus was a big deal though and through his death God the Father was satisfied with the sacrifice and our salvation is complete thank you Jesus for going to the cross and shedding your blood for my sins

Of the two goats, one is sacrificed as a sin - offering for the people and its blood, its life - essence, symbolically sprinkled on and before the mercy - seat (vv.