Sentences with phrase «board majorities on»

His Republican counterpart, Nicholas A. Langworthy, notes that voters in several key towns will determine town board majorities on Nov. 7.

Not exact matches

About 100 Boardlist candidates (some of whom already sit on not - for - profit, for - profit, or advisory boards, and the vast majority of whom live in the U.S.) were asked a number of questions about their experiences in business, and also about the fact that so few women serve on corporate boards.

Proposals to declassify the board and require majority voting are almost always popular with shareholders, so it's not like these companies are going out on a limb.

Nabors» board is not legally compelled to abide by the majority vote against Sheinfeld's election, and it has decided to keep him on the board.

Kalanick had good reason to think he could count on the support of Uber's shareholders: He owns the biggest individual stake and controls a majority of the super-voting shares, making his grip on the board of directors difficult to loosen.

EBay announced on Nov. 19 that it had finally completed the sale of a majority stake in Skype Technologies to a group of investors, including the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board.

Even if they don't have a majority vote on the company's board of directors, investors are still part owners and have legal rights.

2) This new tactic pays lip service to groups of stakeholders, while guaranteeing that the majority of the current board will stay on and be able to choose the replacements for those who have resigned.

The majority of companies still rely on email, physical bulletin boards, or paper - based scorecards to communicate goals, and 7 percent of companies have no organized method for making company goals visible at all.

Elliott wants to keep Genish, appointed by Vivendi, but he told Britain's Sunday Telegraph that his position would be untenable if Elliott and its allies secured a majority of board seats at a shareholder vote on Friday.

On April 17, 2018, I wrote to the board, seeking to restore the Company's reputation by reforming its corporate governance and reconstituting a majority of the board of directors.

But Trump's tax reform hopes have begun to encounter resistance in the Senate, where the Republicans» narrow majority means they have to keep almost everyone in the party on board.

The company's outgoing CEO Michael Pearson will be testifying before the Senate Special Committee on Aging late Wednesday afternoon, along with activist investor William Ackman, a majority shareholder and board member, and Howard Schiller, a director and former chief financial officer.

Though 25 percent of viewers agreed that Markle's outfit was inappropriate for a royal - to - be, the majority thought she should wear whatever she wants — an opinion we're on board with.

Also, if a majority of the Board is comprised of persons other than (i) persons for whose election proxies were solicited by the Board; or (ii) persons who were appointed by the Board to fill vacancies caused by death or resignation or to fill newly - created directorships («Board Change»), unless the Committee or Board determines otherwise prior to such Board Change, then participants immediately prior to the Board Change who cease to be employees or non-employee directors within six months after such Board Change for any reason other than death or permanent disability generally have their (i) options and stock appreciation rights become immediately exercisable and to the extent not canceled or cashed out, generally have at least six months to exercise such awards; (ii) restrictions with respect to restricted stock and RSRs lapse and generally shares are delivered; and (iii) performance shares and performance units pay out pro rata based on performance through the end of the last calendar quarter before the time the participant ceased to be an employee.

New rules will require CBCA companies — about 40 % of companies listed on the TSX — to hold an election for their entire board of directors annually, vote for each director individually and, most importantly, use uniquely crafted majority - voting rules that only let shareholders vote «no» or «yes» for a director, eliminating the use of «withhold» votes which is standard practice under existing TSX rules.

L. (Sept. 1, 2014), http://us.practicallaw.com/4-578-4485 [http://perma.cc/8XRK-A4YL](«It appears that ISS negative vote recommendations based on the perceived lack of board responsiveness to shareholder concerns (as evidenced by the failure to implement a successful shareholder proposal) was the leading factor associated with directors who failed to receive a majority of votes cast in an uncontested election in 2014.»)

On the monetary policy front the big event of the quarter was the adoption of negative rates by the BOJ Policy Board on 29 January on a narrow majority of five to fouOn the monetary policy front the big event of the quarter was the adoption of negative rates by the BOJ Policy Board on 29 January on a narrow majority of five to fouon 29 January on a narrow majority of five to fouon a narrow majority of five to four.

SHARE director of law and policy Laura O'Neill said the only other directors she knows of who failed to win majority support this year were on the board of Quebecor Inc., where holders of class B subordinate shares voted just 43 per cent in favour of electing the entire board as a slate.

New York Stock Exchange rules require that listed companies have a majority of independent directors on the Board.

that Dorfman, who bought a majority stake in The Office Group when he joined the company, will remain on the executive board after the Blackstone purchase has completed alongside Green and Olsen.

And many corporations that have adopted some sort of majority voting have adopted policies that nevertheless allow incumbent directors to remain on corporate boards even if their reelection was opposed by a majority of shareholders.

For the majority of companies we'll be an active participant on the board but often the real value add comes from the hundreds of interactions that occur outside the board room as you use us as a sounding board and partner whilst going through the roller coaster ride of scaling a business.

Most Mergers and Acquisitions are friendly, but a hostile takeover occurs when the acquirer bypasses the board of the targeted company and purchases a majority of the company's stock on the open market.

On four key questions — Are you in favour of replacing the CEO; Are you in favour of revamping strategy; Are you in favour of a senior management upgrade; and Are you in favour of replacing board majority — more than 80 per cent of shareholders were either very positive or positive.

I have a theory that SBNRs are so because one or more or a combination of the following: (1) they can't justify their spiritual texts - and so they try to remove themselves from gory genocidal tales, misogyny and anecdotal professions of a man / god, (2) can't defend and are turned off by organized religious history (which encompasses the overwhelming majority of spiritual experiences)- which is simply rife with cruelty, criminal behavior and even modern day cruel - ignorant ostracization, (3) are unable to separate ethics from their respective religious moral code - they, like many theists on this board, wouldn't know how to think ethically because they think the genesis of morality resides in their respective spiritual guides / traditions and (4) are unable to separate from the communal (social) benefits of their respective religion (many atheists aren't either).

The majority of the centers are related to existing institutions which already have a board of directors, some of which, of course, have clergymen on the board.

But the clause, on page 140 of the MG Unit Trust product disclosure statement, shows the board has the right to prop up the milk price — if recommended by an independent expert and approved by a majority of the board — at the expense of investors, breaking the «profit - sharing mechanism».

But mostly because if my SO were trying to cut out the majority of animal products from their diet but only ate eggs, I would find that a lot easier to get on board with than a bevvy of steaks and fillets (read: dead animal carcasses) being grilled in the same kitchen I prepare my own food in.

RiceBran Technologies (NASDAQ: RIBT and RIBTW)(the «Company»), a global leader in the production and marketing of value added products derived from rice bran, today announced that, based on preliminary noncumulative voting results reported by the independent inspector of elections (the «Inspector») following the Company's 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the «Annual Meeting»), a large majority of shareholders have voted on the WHITE proxy card for the Company's incumbent Board of Directors (the «Board»).

Kroenke is the majority shareholder and on the board of directors, he won't put any money into the club.

It sadly is Sue, we have a divided fan base, an majority shareholder who is (in my opinion) using our clubs assets to secure lending on his other sporting investments, a board who quite frankly see us fans as customers rather than supporters as shown by the chairman's AGMs performance, players who aren't signing new contracts, if you cut Ian Wright and others open you'd see cannons in their blood with some of our players now you'd find image rights and pound signs.

For this debacle I place the blame squarely on the board, the AKBs and our current majority owner.

Absolutely right there He won't go anywhere because he does what the board wants him to He delivers profit and very low risk and sets expectations at virtually zero so that's the fans don't expect too m7ch and he doesn't have to deliver and the board don't need to spend Its a farce and more importantly a blatant con Every single fan who puts even a penny into the club either through season tickets right the way down to buying a mug or a pen or a shirt is being robbed by a board who care NOTHING for sporting glory and even less for the fans who finance the club There SHOULD be mass walkouts on home games and protests at every turn but, there won't be because the demographic of fans now is of a majority who are not true supporters but millennial who only want to say they attend the ground every other week.

The majority of the fans don't realise that the Board have responded to their protests by cancelling / freezing Wenger's renewal, until the end of season... If you took a peace from all the rumour puzzles in the last month or so and put them together, you would get a clearer picture of what's going on at the club.

I do like that you see value in going after OBJ, unlike the board majority you do value impact talent, we agree on that much.

At a very minimum, there would have been 3 owners, all with seats on the board and the club would have been run by a majority vote by the owners on all fronts.

Sadly the hopeless majority on this board remain a united front in proclaiming that Sissoko isnt Arsenal quality and blindly beat there chests extolling the greatness of Ox and Theo

According to the Baltimore Sun's Maryland beat writer, Jeff Barker, it's unclear if the Terps even need a majority vote on the board to approve the transfer or if the University System of Maryland Chancellor William E. Kirwan can simply approve the move on his own.

It is totally beyond me how the board did no due diligence on Kroenke before recommending other board members to sell him their shares, after Arsenal has been so careful in the past to not allow any one person a majority share holding.

You are more or less spot on mate, But, I am not of those that point any of the blame on the board or the majority share holder, if anything, Wenger has been given more control of the club since Kroenke took over!

Savings to prepare for the stadium move and making sure we have enough in the bank incase we slip up... Our old board (excluding Dein) made that pact to never sell to a majority shareholder who was foreign, we had the «British pride» on our side.

Going on past evidence and noting that the «proposed war chest» is 75 million (ironically the same as it was last summer) I would say that we'll likely get a striker but it wont be a top class one it'll be a lasser known player who Wenger will want to be lauded for if he turns into a 25 goal a season striker a la Henry Do nt expect any earth shattering buys cos the majority of that huge cash boost from BT sports will make its way to the boards private accounts.

You must have seen Dein arrive at AFC and the improvements, the ambition... the loss of Dein, the old board make a pact not to sell their shares, seen Gazidis hired before Silent Stan bought majority share position, the old board sell for a nice payday and going against their words, AFC asset value increase year after year while Silent Stan is happy to let that continue and media focuses on Wenger.

The fact of the matter is it seems that if wenger was offered another 2 years the majority would be on board with that and I personally cant see how, if some of the fans are this delusional and would rather see us slowly decline then maybe arsenal deserves what it gets in the long term.

If an arsenal fan can say that why can't Adrian Durham on talksport, time to face reality, with Wenger, the current board and majority shareholder we are a million miles off where we were told we would be when we left Highbury and no matter how many times we as fans are told to get behind the team and manager that won't change the table come May.

I, unlike the majority on this board completely agree with your observations on Theo and the necessity for Arsenal to aggressively reshape there squad this summer.

As such, they'll need to bring on board one of the other parties to reach that magic, majority number.

On a tangent Jon my son (he's 4) asked me why he should support Arsenal, I said «well because I do, you're granddad does and your great granddad did» I was going to say its because of the values and principles that our club has but then I stopped myself because I have no idea what they are anymore other than paying a has been manager and over hyped players a fortune for non achievement while being owned by a majority shareholder that has no interest in the club other than as a business and having a board that view the fans as the gift that keeps on givinOn a tangent Jon my son (he's 4) asked me why he should support Arsenal, I said «well because I do, you're granddad does and your great granddad did» I was going to say its because of the values and principles that our club has but then I stopped myself because I have no idea what they are anymore other than paying a has been manager and over hyped players a fortune for non achievement while being owned by a majority shareholder that has no interest in the club other than as a business and having a board that view the fans as the gift that keeps on givinon giving.

You would need a good few thousand to overthrow Wenger (or get him to change his philosophy) if ever possible with constant banners and match day demonstrations... This ain't guna happen with the corporate majority attending and Wenger / board officials keeping their big bro eye on trouble makers..