Sentences with phrase «board positions because»

Fiona Harris has returned to the board of Oil Search about one year after stepping down from two major board positions because of health issues.

Not exact matches

Pay consultants and recruiters say banks need such flexibility because heightened regulatory burdens make positions on bank boards less attractive than in other sectors.

Well - qualified northeasterners, for example, have lost board seats and CEO positions because their manners and style did not play well to boards in the Midwest or South.

Canadian and international banks take the position that they won't board bitcoin clients because of concerns that bitcoin entities could be used to facilitate drug money laundering activities.

It was only after Mr. Kalanick took a leave to deal with his family's personal tragedies that Benchmark for the first time took the position that Mr. Kalanick should be forced to resign and to give up his right to appoint additional Board members — supposedly because he had withheld information that Benchmark in fact knew all about.

The interviews with family firms revealed that, this is because they believe that a family member, as a representative of the controlling entity, is best positioned to guide the board in its strategic decision making.

I am on board with who they take because I trust their scouting at that position....

My gut tells me that this is a lot like cornerback last year, where we picked a BPA in the 1st round and waited on corner because of the depth of position, but we just don't know the Cowboys board.

There are not even any rumours as to any enquiries being made for someone to fill any of these positions, so you know that the board are hoping for Wenger to carry on, because it's the easiest option.

Arizona and New Orleans have a QB, but their need to draft one could supersede other positions strictly because economics pushes those players up the board.

At the end of day we're in this ridiculous position because of the incompetence of Wenger, and the board, and # 50 million is probably the best we can make of it.

Win or lose today, we are deluding ourselves if we think that Wenger and the board even want to win the league.To me it is clear that Wenger is still employed by the board because he is brilliant at calculating what he needs to do to keep the team in one of the top four positions that he holds so dear.

i do nt understand how the board of arsenal can not see the damage that arsene wenger has done and is doing to this club.even a blind man can see it.i guess they are blinded by greed and their own selfish interest because im sure they are quite intelligent people to have gotten to that position.

And I know lot of you want to blame the board, I'm simply going to point out Steve Bruce quit is position because the board intervened in his transfer affairs, whilst our «caring manager» claims his # 8 million pounds a year salary and the Arsenal fans gladly fund that through astronomical ticket prices, whilst we reminisce about that time «we won something» and celebrate the fact we finish fourth!

there is another tought now i realize why wenger forcing player to play not in his natural position, because the board did nt want splash cash for buying, wenger using this method to criticize the board indirectly.

The sad thing is that if you are in Aaron's position and Barcelona come knocking for you, would you stay a club that can not win the league title or the CL until a deluded manager leaves, which will of course never happen, because the board has no ambition to win trophies, or do you go to the Barcelona machine, where success is the foundation of everything.

No, we lost the game before it even started with another yet guessing pick of the team; player must be really tired and confused, lost, out of position, some benched but score and some on the pitch mocking us all because wenger is lost himself, slave of the board... Awful management in and out the filed...

Because if Arsenal lose again, it would give Arsenal board more justification to fire Wenger or move him to a directorial position.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Geoff - firstly did you copy Wenger in on that letter?The stupid decrepit old fool would not understand it anyway.Also do you believe Stephan Lefore has seen it?He is the idiot who believes we are in this position NOT BECAUSE OF THE BOARD OR OWNER and NOT BECAUSE OF THE MANAGER.Oh no.Its the FAULT OF THE SUPPORTERS.Another mindless idiot to grace this sacred site.

The Cowboys last year, took taco in the 1st because the run on defensive linemen, and said that while he wasn't necessarily the best on their board at the time, they took him because the D - line position was being depleted in the draft, and the secondary position was really deep that year.

When Peter Hillwood is endorsing you you know somethings not right, maybe Hillwoods pocket is in goodshape but how can anybody in a position of influence on the Arsenal Board be excepting this unless it was because of the personel, not even company, financial gains?

I believe the board don't give a *** about the fans because if they does Arsene wenger should have been sacked long time ago it's obvious the french man has seen it all and have nothing new to offer the club he has passed his prime and need to resign and go take a rest the players in arsenal are just average imagine the wacott Ramsey chamberlain all is championship materials and not premiership for arsenal to revitalise they need to buy players great players at such except that I'm afraid we wl keep having the same result and be content with 4th position year in year out.

well i am worried on arsenal future.arsenal board should take some step for the future of appointing new player.but it seem it is becoming to late.one late decision could cause you disastrous.mr chairman and all the directors should please keep their argument aside and think about buying new players because arsenal should become the number one position

Jann, a Marilla town supervisor, chose not to remain on the board because he's seeking the position of executive director of the water authority.

Members of the Buffalo School Board are expected tonight to consider a second resolution seeking the removal of Paladino from his elected position, saying he should be ousted because he violated district policy by discussing sharing information that was discussed in executive session.

«I think he's taking that position because we didn't vote supporting his plan,» said Dolores Orr, chairwoman of Queens Community Board 14.

However, because the position is appointed, not elected, the deputy supervisor can not vote on board resolutions.

A town Ethics Commission has urged the Town Board to remove the following people from their town positions because they are not in compliance with the law.

«We need really competent leadership now because we are in a terrible, terrible position and we know we have an incompetent board that has no curiosity at all, at least public curiosity, and we have an incompetent, lying supervisor,» he said.

Over the last 10 years, the change has been dramatic because a new generation of environmental advocates now hold positions of power in the legislature, on the ports commission and on the air resources board.»

The school board was not in a position to know right or wrong about any matter of policy — we were then arguing about whether the board should have a curriculum committee — because the board didn't have the facts, which it didn't have because it was the superintendent's job to have them (and keep them).

Mr. Bernardo, 44 years old, has been an educational consultant and a real - estate investor and salesman since he was forced to resign from the Montgomery County superintendency position in 1979 because of conflicts with the school board and teachers.

Francisco Negrón, general counsel for the National School Boards Association, said OCR was now positioned «to dictate to a school district» on pretty much anything, because it could always declare a school's plan to be more discriminatory than a hypothetical alternative.

«California Federation of Teachers President Marty Hittleman — the same man who called the parent trigger the «lynch mob provision» — confidently predicted to the media that Gov. Brown would immediately remove me (Ben Austin) from the state board because I had used my position to advocate for radical kids - first change,» said Austin.

However, board meeting minutes showed that they were also the most likely group to have their position reconsidered by governors after two years, usually because exam results were not improving early enough.

For example, in Young - Gibson v. Board of Education (2011), an Illinois appellate court upheld the district's removal of a principal from her position because of her lack of progress in correcting the probationary status of her school, including the students» low test scores.

Because Members of the Utah State Board of Education believe this to be a key position — if not the key position — in the state public education system, we are anxious to have someone on board sooner rather than later in order to have the new superintendent receive some mentoring from Superintendent Shumway and to have the new person up to speed in the job when the Legislature begins to meet in late JanBoard of Education believe this to be a key position — if not the key position — in the state public education system, we are anxious to have someone on board sooner rather than later in order to have the new superintendent receive some mentoring from Superintendent Shumway and to have the new person up to speed in the job when the Legislature begins to meet in late Janboard sooner rather than later in order to have the new superintendent receive some mentoring from Superintendent Shumway and to have the new person up to speed in the job when the Legislature begins to meet in late January.

«Just one month ago, California Federation of Teachers President Marty Hittleman - the same man who called the Parent Trigger the «lynch mob provision» - confidently predicted to the media that Governor Brown would immediately remove me from the State Board because I had used my position to advocate for radical kids - first change, ominously stating that I would not be serving on the State Board «in a month or so.»

Woodard's comments made the newspapers because she is still not in her principal position and told the board that she is reporting to work every day but not being given duties at the Region 3 office.

At 1:00 p.m. today the Citizen's Ethics Advisory Board will hold a meeting in which they will approve a staff recommendation that although Commissioner Pryor helped create Achievement First and served as one of its Directors until he recently resigned to take the Education Commissioner's position, he does not have a conflict of interest under state law because he does not have a financial relationship with Achievement First.

When those who serve in critical positions such as Board Chair, Executive Director or Principal begin to change the vision because they are unable to drive it, schools are left in an unstable condition.

The Cabell County Board of Education in WV is planning on eliminating all elementary librarian positions beginning with the 2018 - 2019 school year because of budget cuts.

We are waging this effort because (a) we feel a sense of responsibility to do so on behalf of all stockholders given our unique position as the largest stockholder and (b) we believe it is the right thing to do, especially in the context of the current economic environment caused, in part, by similar self - serving managements and Boards.

Despite BVF's failure to remove the board, we continued to maintain our position in AVGN because BVF won a number of important concessions from the board that made AVGN a much more attractive stock than it was when we started following it.

Nonetheless, the Registrant takes the position that it is not under common control with such other trusts because the power residing in the respective trusts» boards and officers arises as a result of an official position with each such trust.

Such plans, because they will make big money, have powerful backers: When Heather Zichal left her post as the Obama administration's climate czar, she accepted a $ 180,000 - a-year position on the board of the country's biggest gas exporter.

Because in this case both statutory decision makers (ie the Standards Board and the Adjudication Panel) comprise persons identified by Parliament «because of their experience knowledge and position to apply the relevant Code», therefore «absent an error of law the court is to pay considerable respect to the decision of what is an informed domestic tribunal&Because in this case both statutory decision makers (ie the Standards Board and the Adjudication Panel) comprise persons identified by Parliament «because of their experience knowledge and position to apply the relevant Code», therefore «absent an error of law the court is to pay considerable respect to the decision of what is an informed domestic tribunal&because of their experience knowledge and position to apply the relevant Code», therefore «absent an error of law the court is to pay considerable respect to the decision of what is an informed domestic tribunal».

The Applicant was employed by the Board from 1988 until 2004 when her employment was terminated because the school board did not have a position in which the Applicant could be accommodated as a result of her disabiBoard from 1988 until 2004 when her employment was terminated because the school board did not have a position in which the Applicant could be accommodated as a result of her disabiboard did not have a position in which the Applicant could be accommodated as a result of her disability.

Actually, «progressive» might be a better label for this position than for the current mainstream one I describe above, because deference - across - the - board is probably closer to the views of the original progressives of a century ago, but I suppose that using it in this way now might be confusing.